2025 Trade Deadline Sepculation Thread ALL ABOARD
-
Magneto2.0
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 18100
- Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm
Re: 2025 Trade Deadline Sepculation Thread ALL ABOARD
Keith Law's reaction was "Cardinals got a f'n heist"
So he seems to like the return a lot.
So he seems to like the return a lot.
- CardsofSTL
- All Hail the GDT Master
- Posts: 70076
- Joined: April 26 11, 6:06 am
- Location: Columbus, OH
Re: 2025 Trade Deadline Sepculation Thread ALL ABOARD
Or is low on Helsley.Magneto2.0 wrote: ↑July 30 25, 7:28 pmKeith Law's reaction was "Cardinals got a f'n heist"
So he seems to like the return a lot.
It is hard to say with A pitchers...this will be a fun trade to revisit in a few years if the asteroids miss us.
-
jagtrader
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 12658
- Joined: June 5 06, 10:01 am
Re: 2025 Trade Deadline Sepculation Thread ALL ABOARD
To me, this is the first indication they’re punting 2026. We’ll know more tomorrow.
- Popeye_Card
- GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
- Posts: 31079
- Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am
Re: 2025 Trade Deadline Sepculation Thread ALL ABOARD
Tyler Rogers has also been quite a bit better than Helsley this season. Helsley carries the Proven Closer tag (that he'll lose in NY), and gets more K's. But Rogers' stingy walk rate as the primary setup man in SF makes him a more attractive target.cardsfantx wrote: ↑July 30 25, 5:37 pmGiants got a better return for Tyler rogers than we got for got for helsey
Way to go Mo
-
phins
- Sobbing quietly during Fox programming
- Posts: 12085
- Joined: June 9 06, 3:51 pm
Re: 2025 Trade Deadline Sepculation Thread ALL ABOARD
Interesting. I'll have to take a look. Perhaps I'm missing something on Baez, but I don't see a starting player.Magneto2.0 wrote: ↑July 30 25, 7:28 pmKeith Law's reaction was "Cardinals got a f'n heist"
So he seems to like the return a lot.
I also own the fact that I just don't like chase prone hitters. That's the one area that I rarely see marked improvement in a hitter. I'd much rather find high contact, good swing decision hitters who have upside in rotational acceleration.
Dohm is a nice pickup, he was a 2nd round talent to me and I'd have taken him over Holliday. I don't know much about the other pitcher, honestly, but his pitch data says he has a real shot to make a major league debut.
-
cardsfantx
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 12217
- Joined: November 6 10, 10:58 am
Re: 2025 Trade Deadline Sepculation Thread ALL ABOARD
You can say the same thing about maton but no way he should command a better return than helsleyPopeye_Card wrote: ↑July 30 25, 8:14 pmTyler Rogers has also been quite a bit better than Helsley this season. Helsley carries the Proven Closer tag (that he'll lose in NY), and gets more K's. But Rogers' stingy walk rate as the primary setup man in SF makes him a more attractive target.cardsfantx wrote: ↑July 30 25, 5:37 pmGiants got a better return for Tyler rogers than we got for got for helsey
Way to go Mo
Mo botched this one as usual
-
cardsfantx
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 12217
- Joined: November 6 10, 10:58 am
Re: 2025 Trade Deadline Sepculation Thread ALL ABOARD
Not according to his article?Magneto2.0 wrote: ↑July 30 25, 7:28 pmKeith Law's reaction was "Cardinals got a f'n heist"
So he seems to like the return a lot.
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/652635 ... ed_articleI don’t like this for the St. Louis Cardinals, to put it mildly. Yes, Helsley’s a rental, so it won’t be hard for them to end up “winning” the deal in terms of value returned — if any of these guys gets to the majors, which is not a guarantee, they’ll probably come out ahead by WAR or your metric of choice. Helsley was one of the best relievers on the market, though, and this can’t have been the best possible return.
Infielder Jesus Baez is the most talented of the three prospects the Cardinals received, easily top five in the Mets’ system just on raw tools, but he’s not a very good baseball player. His approach at the plate is just bad, he doesn’t play hard on either side of the ball, and he showed up out of shape this season. He has great bat speed and projects to plus power, although he gets ready so late at the plate, I’m surprised he can get to better velocity. He’s hit .244/.334/.406 this year in High A as a 20-year-old after spending the first week in Low A, with just a 16.7 percent strikeout rate.
-
cardsfantx
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 12217
- Joined: November 6 10, 10:58 am
Re: 2025 Trade Deadline Sepculation Thread ALL ABOARD
Apparently people were posting law’s quote incorrectly; he called it a f’n heist for the Metsphins wrote: ↑July 30 25, 8:54 pmInteresting. I'll have to take a look. Perhaps I'm missing something on Baez, but I don't see a starting player.Magneto2.0 wrote: ↑July 30 25, 7:28 pmKeith Law's reaction was "Cardinals got a f'n heist"
So he seems to like the return a lot.
I also own the fact that I just don't like chase prone hitters. That's the one area that I rarely see marked improvement in a hitter. I'd much rather find high contact, good swing decision hitters who have upside in rotational acceleration.
Dohm is a nice pickup, he was a 2nd round talent to me and I'd have taken him over Holliday. I don't know much about the other pitcher, honestly, but his pitch data says he has a real shot to make a major league debut.
He hates the deal from our perspective from his article
- pioneer98
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 22007
- Joined: July 15 08, 8:24 pm
- Location: High A Minors
Re: 2025 Trade Deadline Sepculation Thread ALL ABOARD
For as bad as Helsley has been this year, I feel like the return is about right
-
phins
- Sobbing quietly during Fox programming
- Posts: 12085
- Joined: June 9 06, 3:51 pm
Re: 2025 Trade Deadline Sepculation Thread ALL ABOARD
Keith Law is really good (probably unpopular), but he doesn't BS about players and I like that.cardsfantx wrote: ↑July 30 25, 9:39 pmNot according to his article?Magneto2.0 wrote: ↑July 30 25, 7:28 pmKeith Law's reaction was "Cardinals got a f'n heist"
So he seems to like the return a lot.
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/652635 ... ed_articleI don’t like this for the St. Louis Cardinals, to put it mildly. Yes, Helsley’s a rental, so it won’t be hard for them to end up “winning” the deal in terms of value returned — if any of these guys gets to the majors, which is not a guarantee, they’ll probably come out ahead by WAR or your metric of choice. Helsley was one of the best relievers on the market, though, and this can’t have been the best possible return.
Infielder Jesus Baez is the most talented of the three prospects the Cardinals received, easily top five in the Mets’ system just on raw tools, but he’s not a very good baseball player. His approach at the plate is just bad, he doesn’t play hard on either side of the ball, and he showed up out of shape this season. He has great bat speed and projects to plus power, although he gets ready so late at the plate, I’m surprised he can get to better velocity. He’s hit .244/.334/.406 this year in High A as a 20-year-old after spending the first week in Low A, with just a 16.7 percent strikeout rate.
FanGraphs guy is good because he is tepid on everyone (as I believe you should be).
Those are the two that are the best evaluators in my opinion. Any of the top guys you should listen to, because they are reporting what team sources are telling them.
Baez is a lazy tools bet. That's generally not great percentage.