Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Discuss all things Cardinals Baseball
Post Reply
jagtrader
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12656
Joined: June 5 06, 10:01 am

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by jagtrader »

Keeping Hicks would be malpractice and further evidence the front office needs a complete overhaul.

cardsfantx
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12204
Joined: November 6 10, 10:58 am

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by cardsfantx »

jagtrader wrote: ↑
July 25 23, 1:05 pm
Keeping Hicks would be malpractice and further evidence the front office needs a complete overhaul.
no kidding. he's a FA to be...if you like him, great! tell him you're trading to make the cardinals better, and we want re-sign you in the offseason

User avatar
sighyoung
Mayor of GRB
Posts: 38626
Joined: April 17 06, 7:42 pm
Location: Louisville

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by sighyoung »

MrCrowesGarden wrote: ↑
July 25 23, 10:12 am
G. Keenan wrote: ↑
July 25 23, 10:04 am
I'll bet 10 GRB coin we don't trade anyone.
In today's live chat about the Cardinals, Derrick Goold is writing that the team IS open to trading O'Neill:
OK. Not sure what this means or where that info is coming from. Cardinals have had conversations with teams about trading O'Neill. They were open to doing so, according to a source with one team looking for outfielders. There are questions about O'Neill's health, and the Cardinals are out to answer that -- for themselves, for other teams, too. I'll happily stand by how I described the situation based on reporting in this morning's coverage.

User avatar
booger71
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 5773
Joined: June 19 18, 5:36 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by booger71 »

TON"s back would be fine if he would spend less time in the weight room and take up Yoga to learn to properly stretch.

jagtrader
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12656
Joined: June 5 06, 10:01 am

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by jagtrader »

O’Neill or Edman to the Mariners.

Online
dmarx114
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 25480
Joined: December 20 07, 2:45 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by dmarx114 »

I would keep O'Neill. Will be motivated next year.

cardsfantx
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12204
Joined: November 6 10, 10:58 am

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by cardsfantx »

jagtrader wrote: ↑
July 25 23, 2:27 pm
O’Neill or Edman to the Mariners.
Both

Magneto2.0
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 18098
Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by Magneto2.0 »

The two-year, $38MM extension that Lance Lynn signed with the White Sox in July 2021 also contained some partial no-trade protection, allowing Lynn to block deals to 10 teams per year. According to The Athletic’s Ken Rosenthal, the 10 clubs on Lynn’s no-trade list are the Padres, Dodgers, Giants, Cardinals, Mets, Angels, Mariners, Yankees, Rays, and Blue Jays. Several of those teams are known be looking for pitching as the deadline approaches, though of Lynn’s 10 listed clubs, only Tampa Bay has been linked to the veteran right-hander to date.
https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2023/07/ ... nbull.html

cardsfantx
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12204
Joined: November 6 10, 10:58 am

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by cardsfantx »

Weird that he has mostly teams that are typically contenders

You’d think it’d be a list of the royals and such

Magneto2.0
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 18098
Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm

Re: Mozeliak: "Some Changes" Coming For Cardinals, But Not A Rebuild

Post by Magneto2.0 »

cardsfantx wrote: ↑
July 25 23, 2:45 pm
Weird that he has mostly teams that are typically contenders

You’d think it’d be a list of the royals and such
I assume he list teams that are more likely to trade for him (since they're usually contenders) as a way to say "I don't want to be traded, period" lol.

Probably lack of incentive to put the lesser teams since they're unlikely to have any motivation to trade for him.
Last edited by Magneto2.0 on July 25 23, 2:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply