mikechamp wrote:Holy goodness, SJ!lukethedrifter wrote:
That might be Exhibit A for: "Blowing a guy up".

Zac Stacy > Stephen Jackson
mikechamp wrote:Holy goodness, SJ!lukethedrifter wrote:
That might be Exhibit A for: "Blowing a guy up".

A group of 49ers fans who raised money for a billboard in Seattle, to brag about their team’s five Super Bowl trophies, have gotten their sign.
49ers fans billboard
The digital billboard in question, pictured here at center-left, is just north of Fife, about 27 miles from downtown Seattle.
Twenty-seven miles south of Seattle. In Fife, near Tacoma.
On a digital billboard.
So much for erecting a sign next to CenturyLink Field just south of downtown Seattle. The digital billboard along the side of Interstate-5 is 26.8 miles away from the Seahawks’ home field via the freeway.
For context, that would be as if Seahawks fans got a billboard in Palo Alto, Calif. Sure, that’s 49ers country, but it ain’t exactly right next to Candlestick Park (28 miles away, in fact).
San Francisco fans paid $7,000 for that?
The organizer of the billboard effort confirmed the location to seattlepi.com on Sunday. According to the group’s online fundraising page, 49ers fans raised more than $11,400 for the billboard, which depicts five Super Bowl trophies with the text, “Got Lombardis?”
As we previously reported, the excess money is slated for donation to Seattle Children’s hospital.

Won't happen. Fisher's said as much in a presser months ago.cardsfansince82 wrote:They have to cut Bradford, right? He makes way too much money to be mediocre or hurt all the time.
I like the concept. Is a trade still possible?Secret Weapon wrote:Bradford is due 17.5 million next year. If they cut him, he would only cost 3.5 million against the cap. Draft a QB and you would save quite a bit of money for a team that doesn't have a lot of cap space.
You can't afford to spend that much money on a mediocre QB and still build a decent team around that. Hell, Tom Brady only makes 15 million.
BTW it would be hilarious if the Redskins ended up with the #1 overall pick
No they aren't because of the new rookie contract limits. Andrew Luck was drafted #1 and only counted 4 million against the cap the first year. They would save about 10 million by cutting Bradford and drafting the top rookie QB.Freed Roger wrote:I like the concept. Is a trade still possible?Secret Weapon wrote:Bradford is due 17.5 million next year. If they cut him, he would only cost 3.5 million against the cap. Draft a QB and you would save quite a bit of money for a team that doesn't have a lot of cap space.
You can't afford to spend that much money on a mediocre QB and still build a decent team around that. Hell, Tom Brady only makes 15 million.
BTW it would be hilarious if the Redskins ended up with the #1 overall pick
If they draft a QB high, then they are in the same salary situation (or worse).