The Beer Thread

Chat about non-baseball topics. No political discussions!
Post Reply
User avatar
Radbird
There's someone in my head but it's not me
Posts: 62389
Joined: April 18 06, 5:08 pm
Location: LF Bleachers @ Busch II

Re: The Beer Thread

Post by Radbird »


jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: The Beer Thread

Post by jim »

I was in a training class this week and we touched on substance abuse in the workforce. Some study said that 3 out of 4 people that meet the definition of alcohol abuse never have negative consequences job-wise/relationship-wise etc.. with it. That's good news fella's ... we got the numbers working for us.

User avatar
G. Keenan
Sucking on the Rally Nipple
Posts: 23718
Joined: April 16 06, 6:03 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: The Beer Thread

Post by G. Keenan »

jim wrote:I was in a training class this week and we touched on substance abuse in the workforce. Some study said that 3 out of 4 people that meet the definition of alcohol abuse never have negative consequences job-wise/relationship-wise etc.. with it. That's good news fella's ... we got the numbers working for us.
Probably because according to doctors and their "science" if you have like 5 beers a week that's alcohol abuse.

User avatar
vinsanity
Chili dog truther
Posts: 8836
Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
Location: Indianapolis

Re: The Beer Thread

Post by vinsanity »

G. Keenan wrote:
jim wrote:I was in a training class this week and we touched on substance abuse in the workforce. Some study said that 3 out of 4 people that meet the definition of alcohol abuse never have negative consequences job-wise/relationship-wise etc.. with it. That's good news fella's ... we got the numbers working for us.
Probably because according to doctors and their "science" if you have like 5 beers a week that's alcohol abuse.
Losers. I mean 5 beers a day is cool...right?

Anyways, I know the numbers are ridiculously, but if my current acquaintances - work or other are any indication - there's a lot more 20-30 drink-a-weekers than I had previously thought.

User avatar
haltz
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 22630
Joined: November 9 06, 6:45 am
Location: a proud midwestern metropolis

Re: The Beer Thread

Post by haltz »

vinsanity wrote:Anyways, I know the numbers are ridiculously, but if my current acquaintances - work or other are any indication - there's a lot more 20-30 drink-a-weekers than I had previously thought.
We've gotten to the point on GRB where you can omit the phrase "small sample size" entirely, and everyone knows what you mean.

I like the definition that makes an alcoholic someone who continues in spite of or experiences negative consequences, not some arbitrary threshold of drinks. I'm probably one according to both, but the former makes more sense.

User avatar
G. Keenan
Sucking on the Rally Nipple
Posts: 23718
Joined: April 16 06, 6:03 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: The Beer Thread

Post by G. Keenan »

haltz wrote:
vinsanity wrote:Anyways, I know the numbers are ridiculously, but if my current acquaintances - work or other are any indication - there's a lot more 20-30 drink-a-weekers than I had previously thought.
We've gotten to the point on GRB where you can omit the phrase "small sample size" entirely, and everyone knows what you mean.

I like the definition that makes an alcoholic someone who continues in spite of or experiences negative consequences, not some arbitrary threshold of drinks. I'm probably one according to both, but the former makes more sense.
How does that define negative consequences? If it means some pretty epic hangovers or one or two bouts with what may have been alcohol poisoning then I'll cop to that. But from an "experience" standpoint I've never had one I'd call negative. Even the painful or embarrassing ones have been worth it.

User avatar
haltz
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 22630
Joined: November 9 06, 6:45 am
Location: a proud midwestern metropolis

Re: The Beer Thread

Post by haltz »

Financial, legal, relationships etc.

User avatar
Swirls
gone fission
Posts: 8299
Joined: December 11 07, 4:15 pm
Location: South Korea

Re: The Beer Thread

Post by Swirls »

vinsanity wrote:
G. Keenan wrote:
jim wrote:I was in a training class this week and we touched on substance abuse in the workforce. Some study said that 3 out of 4 people that meet the definition of alcohol abuse never have negative consequences job-wise/relationship-wise etc.. with it. That's good news fella's ... we got the numbers working for us.
Probably because according to doctors and their "science" if you have like 5 beers a week that's alcohol abuse.
Losers. I mean 5 beers a day is cool...right?

Anyways, I know the numbers are ridiculously, but if my current acquaintances - work or other are any indication - there's a lot more 20-30 drink-a-weekers than I had previously thought.
I always knew I was an over-achiever at life.

Freed Roger
Seeking a Zubaz seamstress
Posts: 26073
Joined: September 4 07, 1:48 pm
Location: St. Louis

Re: The Beer Thread

Post by Freed Roger »

Image

Enjoying this Deschutes Red Chair Northwest Pale Ale. Their Black Butte Porter is good as well. Found it at Trader Joes -who have taken heed of our complaints, and now have a decent beer offerings.

jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: The Beer Thread

Post by jim »

vinsanity wrote:
G. Keenan wrote:
jim wrote:I was in a training class this week and we touched on substance abuse in the workforce. Some study said that 3 out of 4 people that meet the definition of alcohol abuse never have negative consequences job-wise/relationship-wise etc.. with it. That's good news fella's ... we got the numbers working for us.
Probably because according to doctors and their "science" if you have like 5 beers a week that's alcohol abuse.
Losers. I mean 5 beers a day is cool...right?
Beer doesn't count. Would you worry if you drank 5 glasses of water a day?

Post Reply