If, as former 49ers G.M. Scot McCloughan has said with tongue supposedly planted in cheek, his current team in Seattle “beat[s] the hell out of” his former team from San Fran later today, the Packers will nail down the No. 1 seed in the NFC playoff field. With the quest for perfection gone up in smoke (signals) six days ago at Arrowhead Stadium, the Packers would have nothing for which to play on Sunday night.
So the Packers would be facing a potential dilemma, especially if Saturday’s other results give the 7-7 Bears more than a glimmer of hope for a wild-card berth. Should Green Bay rest starters for all or part of the Christmas night contest? Or should the Packers try to knock their arch-rivals out of playoff contention, like the Bears tried (unsuccessfully) to do in Week 17 a year ago?
The Packers' dilemma
- Mary1966
- President of the Ponson Fan Club
- Posts: 11171
- Joined: April 18 06, 10:56 pm
- Location: Tacoma, WA
The Packers' dilemma
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... e/related/
- AdmiralKird
- MBA, CPA, CFA, CFP, JD, PE, MD
- Posts: 10170
- Joined: March 7 07, 4:50 pm
- Location: Tycho Crater, Luna
Re: The Packers' dilemma
You always play to win. People are paying millions to watch the game in person, millions of people are watching around the world, and its the only game on Christmas Day. You play to win.
- doe_boy
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 10738
- Joined: April 25 06, 9:48 am
- Location: Appleton, WI
Re: The Packers' dilemma
Pile up a big lead early and then sit Rodgers, Matthews, Woodson and anyone else you want to keep out of harm's way.
But, play to win the whole game if it's close.
But, play to win the whole game if it's close.
- slide_into_first
- is unaware that dangerous is the real Tyler Durden
- Posts: 14433
- Joined: June 10 09, 11:31 pm
- Location: In Chula Vista hanging with the Surenos
Re: The Packers' dilemma
Definitely should not risk injuries against Detroit- take 2 weeks to get ready for playoffs.
- cpebbles
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 8829
- Joined: August 30 07, 12:28 pm
Re: The Packers' dilemma
Rest Rodgers and make sure you take away the record for single-season QB rating away from that cleft-chinned turd in New England.
- Schlich
- Don't tone police me bro!
- Posts: 10841
- Joined: July 1 06, 7:24 pm
- Location: Lost in the Cloud
Re: The Packers' dilemma
I think Manning owns that record.cpebbles wrote:Rest Rodgers and make sure you take away the record for single-season QB rating away from that cleft-chinned turd in New England.
- Mary1966
- President of the Ponson Fan Club
- Posts: 11171
- Joined: April 18 06, 10:56 pm
- Location: Tacoma, WA
Re: The Packers' dilemma
The Packers did sit Rodgers for the Lions' game--and backup Matt Flynn went on to throw six TD passes. So now people are saying that the Packers could put in a yellow dog as their QB, it's the system that makes Rodgers great.
-
Freed Roger
- Seeking a Zubaz seamstress
- Posts: 26073
- Joined: September 4 07, 1:48 pm
- Location: St. Louis
Re: The Packers' dilemma
Even Tebow?Mary1966 wrote:The Packers did sit Rodgers for the Lions' game--and backup Matt Flynn went on to throw six TD passes. So now people are saying that the Packers could put in a yellow dog as their QB, it's the system that makes Rodgers great.
/ducks away from Socnorb
- Richie Allen
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 7458
- Joined: December 22 06, 1:06 am
Re: The Packers' dilemma
And people are idiots. I've heard the same arguments. We've known for awhile now that Matt Flynn might be one of the best reserve QBs in the league. And how can a system, other than perhaps nothing but screen passes, explain Rodgers' small handful of interceptions. He's the MVP and has had one of the best seasons of all time for a QB. Flynn will probably be starting somewhere in the NFL next year. And people will still be idiots.Mary1966 wrote:The Packers did sit Rodgers for the Lions' game--and backup Matt Flynn went on to throw six TD passes. So now people are saying that the Packers could put in a yellow dog as their QB, it's the system that makes Rodgers great.
- vinsanity
- Chili dog truther
- Posts: 8836
- Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
- Location: Indianapolis
Re: The Packers' dilemma
I don't think the suggestion was that he's only good because of the system, just that the system does a good job of hiding his flaws and emphasizing his strengths. He wouldn't necessarily have had the same success in STL or NE or Indy or NY but he'd still be a franchise QB.Richie Allen wrote:And people are idiots. I've heard the same arguments. We've known for awhile now that Matt Flynn might be one of the best reserve QBs in the league. And how can a system, other than perhaps nothing but screen passes, explain Rodgers' small handful of interceptions. He's the MVP and has had one of the best seasons of all time for a QB. Flynn will probably be starting somewhere in the NFL next year. And people will still be idiots.Mary1966 wrote:The Packers did sit Rodgers for the Lions' game--and backup Matt Flynn went on to throw six TD passes. So now people are saying that the Packers could put in a yellow dog as their QB, it's the system that makes Rodgers great.


.jpg)


