Rant: Fangraph's Colors

The forum for ranting, raving, complaining and praising
Post Reply
User avatar
AdmiralKird
MBA, CPA, CFA, CFP, JD, PE, MD
Posts: 10178
Joined: March 7 07, 4:50 pm
Location: Tycho Crater, Luna

Rant: Fangraph's Colors

Post by AdmiralKird »

Mine are much more eye pleasing.

User avatar
ghostrunner
GOAT
Posts: 30870
Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm

Re: Rant: Fangraph's Colors

Post by ghostrunner »

I wish they'd incorporate some more things into the graphs, like WPA and the new Value wins and Runs categories.

User avatar
Bo Hart
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 8770
Joined: April 14 06, 9:50 pm

Re: Rant: Fangraph's Colors

Post by Bo Hart »

At least they have a modern-day layout, unlike Baseball Reference (which, by the way, will soon be changed into something a lot more visually-appealing).

User avatar
ghostrunner
GOAT
Posts: 30870
Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm

Re: Rant: Fangraph's Colors

Post by ghostrunner »

Kyle wrote:At least they have a modern-day layout, unlike Baseball Reference (which, by the way, will soon be changed into something a lot more visually-appealing).
Really? That makes me nervous.

I think it's very readable as it is. It's simple and it loads fast. Certain things could work better, like comparing players, and calling up different splits. Yet overall I'm pretty happy with it.

I have this fear that one day I'm going to read a headline that says "Google decides to add features to it's front page." This gives me the same feeling.

EDIT - Okay, nevermind - it looks pretty decent. Still nice and simple. Found this link:

http://sandbox.baseball-reference.com/leaders/

User avatar
PujolJunkie
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 10370
Joined: March 22 07, 4:54 pm
Location: north county, stl
Contact:

Re: Rant: Fangraph's Colors

Post by PujolJunkie »

ghostrunner wrote:
Kyle wrote:At least they have a modern-day layout, unlike Baseball Reference (which, by the way, will soon be changed into something a lot more visually-appealing).
Really? That makes me nervous.

I think it's very readable as it is. It's simple and it loads fast. Certain things could work better, like comparing players, and calling up different splits. Yet overall I'm pretty happy with it.

I have this fear that one day I'm going to read a headline that says "Google decides to add features to it's front page." This gives me the same feeling.

EDIT - Okay, nevermind - it looks pretty decent. Still nice and simple. Found this link:

http://sandbox.baseball-reference.com/leaders/
I especially like the Teams page. It shows how many players have come through the organization. That's neat.

User avatar
Bo Hart
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 8770
Joined: April 14 06, 9:50 pm

Re: Rant: Fangraph's Colors

Post by Bo Hart »

http://sandbox.baseball-reference.com/p ... vl01.shtml

Check out how much better that is. The stats are finally in tables (the big benefit to that is that they don't have to use an ugly font); you can even sort the tables using any of the column headers.

Post Reply