Page 1 of 2

Glad Hand for Randy K

Posted: April 11 07, 7:53 am
by valley_card22
Not superstar stuff by any imagination, but he did his job. Hopefully he can hold the fort down while Carp gets better.

The teams he faces will get tougher, but anything in the 6-7 inning 3-4 run range is very good.


Nice job Randy

=D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

Posted: April 11 07, 7:54 am
by heyzeus
how about jazz hands for randy?

Image

Posted: April 11 07, 8:05 am
by Cronos
Image

Posted: April 11 07, 8:06 am
by JL21
He did fine..... but I have the lowest of hopes for his future starts. I'm thoroughly unimpressed.

Posted: April 11 07, 8:23 am
by StL Dan
RC21 wrote:He did fine..... but I have the lowest of hopes for his future starts. I'm thoroughly unimpressed.
I really enjoyed that post, Mr. Sunshine. :evil:

Posted: April 11 07, 8:28 am
by JL21
Yeah, sorry. On the other hand, I think there are legit reasons for hope with Wells, Wainwright, and Looper. Just not Keisler.

Posted: April 11 07, 8:32 am
by Cronos
RC21 wrote:Yeah, sorry. On the other hand, I think there are legit reasons for hope with Wells, Wainwright, and Looper. Just not Keisler.
There's a name missing from that list, and I don't mean Carpenter. If it was on purpose, I think I agree with you.

Posted: April 11 07, 8:37 am
by BW23
I agree with him, too. But I've felt that way for a while.

Posted: April 11 07, 8:38 am
by JL21
Cronos69 wrote:
RC21 wrote:Yeah, sorry. On the other hand, I think there are legit reasons for hope with Wells, Wainwright, and Looper. Just not Keisler.
There's a name missing from that list, and I don't mean Carpenter. If it was on purpose, I think I agree with you.
It was on purpose. But even then, I have a hell of a lot more hope for him than I do for Keisler.

Posted: April 11 07, 8:45 am
by jim
Not taking away from what Keisler did last night, you could say it was a game Carp was supposed to pitch and we win - no harm no foul. But put me in the unimpressed category as well. If that were the Mets we'd be having a different conversation.