Big Ten Expansion

A forum for non-baseball sports
Post Reply
User avatar
Transmogrified Tiger
Puppy Murderer
Posts: 9323
Joined: April 25 06, 6:07 pm
Location: Across the River

Re: Big Ten Expansion

Post by Transmogrified Tiger »

He got paid to write that. Real money, that you can buy things with.


Mizzou has been a Top 25 program in recent years in football, basketball, soccer, wrestling, baseball, gymnastics, and softball. But I can see his point, if some guy said 12 years ago that Mizzou is stingy then I guess his case is bulletproof.

User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37260
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: Big Ten Expansion

Post by lukethedrifter »

Besides, I don't think anyone is trying to say that MU has the athletic legacy of OU, UT or Nebraska.

User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: Big Ten Expansion

Post by JL21 »

lukethedrifter wrote:Besides, I don't think anyone is trying to say that MU has the athletic legacy of OU, UT or Nebraska.
But... apparently, Baylor's Womens Golf team kicks Mizzou's ass.

http://www.qwizx.com/gssfx/usa/tpirhorns.wav

User avatar
vinsanity
Chili dog truther
Posts: 8836
Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
Location: Indianapolis

Re: Big Ten Expansion

Post by vinsanity »

lukethedrifter wrote:Besides, I don't think anyone is trying to say that MU has the athletic legacy of OU, UT or Nebraska.
Apparently not of Baylor, OSU or KSU either.
Transmogrified Tiger wrote:He got paid to write that. Real money, that you can buy things with.
I like to think he gets paid for better journalism than that, and wrote that merely to be inflammatory and as a deadline piece.

User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 31085
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: Big Ten Expansion

Post by Popeye_Card »

This may have been discussed earlier, but I read in the paper today that the Big Ten is only interested in adding AAU schools, as all of the current conference are members.

Notable AAU members: Mizzou, Nebraska, Rutgers, Iowa State, Texas, Texas A&M, Syracuse, Vandy, Kansas, Pitt

Notable non-AAU members: Notre Dame

Though perhaps part of the stall is waiting for Notre Dame to be extended AAU membership?

User avatar
vinsanity
Chili dog truther
Posts: 8836
Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
Location: Indianapolis

Re: Big Ten Expansion

Post by vinsanity »

Popeye_Card wrote:This may have been discussed earlier, but I read in the paper today that the Big Ten is only interested in adding AAU schools, as all of the current conference are members.

Notable AAU members: Mizzou, Nebraska, Rutgers, Iowa State, Texas, Texas A&M, Syracuse, Vandy, Kansas, Pitt

Notable non-AAU members: Notre Dame

Though perhaps part of the stall is waiting for Notre Dame to be extended AAU membership?
I'm sure they make exceptions for ND.

User avatar
Radio_Bugtussle
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 3450
Joined: July 26 06, 9:51 am
Location: Searching for the perfect microbrew

Re: Big Ten Expansion

Post by Radio_Bugtussle »

vinsanity wrote:
lukethedrifter wrote:Besides, I don't think anyone is trying to say that MU has the athletic legacy of OU, UT or Nebraska.
Apparently not of Baylor, OSU or KSU either.
Transmogrified Tiger wrote:He got paid to write that. Real money, that you can buy things with.
I like to think he gets paid for better journalism than that, and wrote that merely to be inflammatory and as a deadline piece.
Some days ya just gotta fill column inches somehow, some way. This guy simply took the Jason Whitlock approach.

User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 31085
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: Big Ten Expansion

Post by Popeye_Card »

I'm not so sure. It was the one thing they claimed was an absolute requirement.

But like I said, they may be waiting for Notre Dame to be invited into that club, and having 11 of the 63 members, the Big Ten probably has some clout as to who gets invited.

User avatar
StL Dan
banned
Posts: 8159
Joined: June 14 06, 9:40 pm
Location: St. Louis in spirit

Re: Big Ten Expansion

Post by StL Dan »

Popeye_Card wrote:This may have been discussed earlier, but I read in the paper today that the Big Ten is only interested in adding AAU schools, as all of the current conference are members.

Notable AAU members: Mizzou, Nebraska, Rutgers, Iowa State, Texas, Texas A&M, Syracuse, Vandy, Kansas, Pitt

Notable non-AAU members: Notre Dame

Though perhaps part of the stall is waiting for Notre Dame to be extended AAU membership?
I suppose this is one tangible reason why MU can say the move for them would be a step up academically.

User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37260
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: Big Ten Expansion

Post by lukethedrifter »

I've heard no discussion of bringing Vandy in- because they add very very very few TV sets- but they sure seem a better fit in the B10 than the SEC. Or even the ACC.

Post Reply