Big Ten Expansion
- Transmogrified Tiger
- Puppy Murderer
- Posts: 9323
- Joined: April 25 06, 6:07 pm
- Location: Across the River
Re: Big Ten Expansion
He got paid to write that. Real money, that you can buy things with.
Mizzou has been a Top 25 program in recent years in football, basketball, soccer, wrestling, baseball, gymnastics, and softball. But I can see his point, if some guy said 12 years ago that Mizzou is stingy then I guess his case is bulletproof.
Mizzou has been a Top 25 program in recent years in football, basketball, soccer, wrestling, baseball, gymnastics, and softball. But I can see his point, if some guy said 12 years ago that Mizzou is stingy then I guess his case is bulletproof.
- lukethedrifter
- darjeeling sipping elite
- Posts: 37260
- Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
- Location: Huis Clos
Re: Big Ten Expansion
Besides, I don't think anyone is trying to say that MU has the athletic legacy of OU, UT or Nebraska.
- JL21
- NPR & THT Contributor
- Posts: 36109
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
- Location: Chocolate City
Re: Big Ten Expansion
But... apparently, Baylor's Womens Golf team kicks Mizzou's ass.lukethedrifter wrote:Besides, I don't think anyone is trying to say that MU has the athletic legacy of OU, UT or Nebraska.
http://www.qwizx.com/gssfx/usa/tpirhorns.wav
- vinsanity
- Chili dog truther
- Posts: 8836
- Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
- Location: Indianapolis
Re: Big Ten Expansion
Apparently not of Baylor, OSU or KSU either.lukethedrifter wrote:Besides, I don't think anyone is trying to say that MU has the athletic legacy of OU, UT or Nebraska.
I like to think he gets paid for better journalism than that, and wrote that merely to be inflammatory and as a deadline piece.Transmogrified Tiger wrote:He got paid to write that. Real money, that you can buy things with.
- Popeye_Card
- GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
- Posts: 31085
- Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am
Re: Big Ten Expansion
This may have been discussed earlier, but I read in the paper today that the Big Ten is only interested in adding AAU schools, as all of the current conference are members.
Notable AAU members: Mizzou, Nebraska, Rutgers, Iowa State, Texas, Texas A&M, Syracuse, Vandy, Kansas, Pitt
Notable non-AAU members: Notre Dame
Though perhaps part of the stall is waiting for Notre Dame to be extended AAU membership?
Notable AAU members: Mizzou, Nebraska, Rutgers, Iowa State, Texas, Texas A&M, Syracuse, Vandy, Kansas, Pitt
Notable non-AAU members: Notre Dame
Though perhaps part of the stall is waiting for Notre Dame to be extended AAU membership?
- vinsanity
- Chili dog truther
- Posts: 8836
- Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
- Location: Indianapolis
Re: Big Ten Expansion
I'm sure they make exceptions for ND.Popeye_Card wrote:This may have been discussed earlier, but I read in the paper today that the Big Ten is only interested in adding AAU schools, as all of the current conference are members.
Notable AAU members: Mizzou, Nebraska, Rutgers, Iowa State, Texas, Texas A&M, Syracuse, Vandy, Kansas, Pitt
Notable non-AAU members: Notre Dame
Though perhaps part of the stall is waiting for Notre Dame to be extended AAU membership?
- Radio_Bugtussle
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 3450
- Joined: July 26 06, 9:51 am
- Location: Searching for the perfect microbrew
Re: Big Ten Expansion
Some days ya just gotta fill column inches somehow, some way. This guy simply took the Jason Whitlock approach.vinsanity wrote:Apparently not of Baylor, OSU or KSU either.lukethedrifter wrote:Besides, I don't think anyone is trying to say that MU has the athletic legacy of OU, UT or Nebraska.I like to think he gets paid for better journalism than that, and wrote that merely to be inflammatory and as a deadline piece.Transmogrified Tiger wrote:He got paid to write that. Real money, that you can buy things with.
- Popeye_Card
- GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
- Posts: 31085
- Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am
Re: Big Ten Expansion
I'm not so sure. It was the one thing they claimed was an absolute requirement.
But like I said, they may be waiting for Notre Dame to be invited into that club, and having 11 of the 63 members, the Big Ten probably has some clout as to who gets invited.
But like I said, they may be waiting for Notre Dame to be invited into that club, and having 11 of the 63 members, the Big Ten probably has some clout as to who gets invited.
- StL Dan
- banned
- Posts: 8159
- Joined: June 14 06, 9:40 pm
- Location: St. Louis in spirit
Re: Big Ten Expansion
I suppose this is one tangible reason why MU can say the move for them would be a step up academically.Popeye_Card wrote:This may have been discussed earlier, but I read in the paper today that the Big Ten is only interested in adding AAU schools, as all of the current conference are members.
Notable AAU members: Mizzou, Nebraska, Rutgers, Iowa State, Texas, Texas A&M, Syracuse, Vandy, Kansas, Pitt
Notable non-AAU members: Notre Dame
Though perhaps part of the stall is waiting for Notre Dame to be extended AAU membership?
- lukethedrifter
- darjeeling sipping elite
- Posts: 37260
- Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
- Location: Huis Clos
Re: Big Ten Expansion
I've heard no discussion of bringing Vandy in- because they add very very very few TV sets- but they sure seem a better fit in the B10 than the SEC. Or even the ACC.




