They should, and quick. Since there's no salary cap this year it would be perfect timing.cardsfansince82 wrote:Ah I wasn't aware of his contract status. I still wouldn't give the Eagles anything more than jack [expletive] for McNabb. Can the Raiders shed JaMarcus Russell yet?
Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread
- letsgocards89
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 3654
- Joined: April 17 06, 7:35 pm
- Location: Too close for missiles, switching to guns
Re: Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread
- Hungary Jack
- Mother Earth
- Posts: 19536
- Joined: July 24 06, 6:03 am
- Location: In Cognito
Re: Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread
I think he's due a $19.9M roster bonus this year, which is actually an advance against his future salaries. That indeed does count against the cap for 2010, so it would be a good time to release him.letsgocards89 wrote:They should, and quick. Since there's no salary cap this year it would be perfect timing.cardsfansince82 wrote:Ah I wasn't aware of his contract status. I still wouldn't give the Eagles anything more than jack [expletive] for McNabb. Can the Raiders shed JaMarcus Russell yet?
-
phins
- Sobbing quietly during Fox programming
- Posts: 12085
- Joined: June 9 06, 3:51 pm
Re: Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread
I've always thought McShay was a hack, but man, if this was really said, this is a giant slap to his (pretty) face:
One veteran NFL scout opined to Profootballtalk.com that the main reason Ole Miss QB Jevan Snead declared for the 2010 NFL Draft is because ESPN's Todd McShay predicted Snead would be a top-five pick.
"The (Snead) family thought McShay knew and everyone else was wrong," the scout said. "(Snead) has problems with game management, accuracy and leadership...but pretty boy Todd thought he was great because of (the Cotton Bowl) a year ago. McShay is a pretty face who comes across like he knows what he is talking about. He does have good presence, but knows nothing."
- cardsfansince82
- is shooing asian children away from his fridge.
- Posts: 27776
- Joined: May 17 06, 10:23 pm
- Location: at the gettin' place
Re: Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread
Hmm. I've never seen McShay with Snead any higher than fourth among QBs, possibly even worse. His top 3 all along has been Bradford, Clausen and McCoy. It might have happened at some point early last season or going into last season before Snead killed a lot of his hype. Either way I'd say the Snead family comes out looking worse than McShay ever would.phinstd wrote:I've always thought McShay was a hack, but man, if this was really said, this is a giant slap to his (pretty) face:
One veteran NFL scout opined to Profootballtalk.com that the main reason Ole Miss QB Jevan Snead declared for the 2010 NFL Draft is because ESPN's Todd McShay predicted Snead would be a top-five pick.
"The (Snead) family thought McShay knew and everyone else was wrong," the scout said. "(Snead) has problems with game management, accuracy and leadership...but pretty boy Todd thought he was great because of (the Cotton Bowl) a year ago. McShay is a pretty face who comes across like he knows what he is talking about. He does have good presence, but knows nothing."
-
phins
- Sobbing quietly during Fox programming
- Posts: 12085
- Joined: June 9 06, 3:51 pm
Re: Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread
McShay is a hack, and before the time to declare, McShay used to love Snead. I repeat, McShay is a hack.cardsfansince82 wrote:Hmm. I've never seen McShay with Snead any higher than fourth among QBs, possibly even worse. His top 3 all along has been Bradford, Clausen and McCoy. It might have happened at some point early last season or going into last season before Snead killed a lot of his hype. Either way I'd say the Snead family comes out looking worse than McShay ever would.phinstd wrote:I've always thought McShay was a hack, but man, if this was really said, this is a giant slap to his (pretty) face:
One veteran NFL scout opined to Profootballtalk.com that the main reason Ole Miss QB Jevan Snead declared for the 2010 NFL Draft is because ESPN's Todd McShay predicted Snead would be a top-five pick.
"The (Snead) family thought McShay knew and everyone else was wrong," the scout said. "(Snead) has problems with game management, accuracy and leadership...but pretty boy Todd thought he was great because of (the Cotton Bowl) a year ago. McShay is a pretty face who comes across like he knows what he is talking about. He does have good presence, but knows nothing."
I just love to hear scouts saying the same things I've always felt about McShay. When Scoutsinc came into a partnership with ESPN, they needed someone to put on air, and McShay was the face to put on there.
Last edited by phins on March 31 10, 1:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- lukethedrifter
- darjeeling sipping elite
- Posts: 37260
- Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
- Location: Huis Clos
Re: Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread
As are the Sneads apparently.
-
phins
- Sobbing quietly during Fox programming
- Posts: 12085
- Joined: June 9 06, 3:51 pm
Re: Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread
Yes, it sure doesn't help Jevan any to hear they would believe something like that over the advisory board. Sounds a little made up, but any chance I see to make fun of McShay has to be taken.lukethedrifter wrote:As are the Sneads apparently.
-
John Cottingham
- Single A Minor League Player
- Posts: 5
- Joined: April 1 10, 7:38 am
Re: Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread
McNabb is not rated correctly by most fans. He is a Hall of Fame quarterback if he retired right now.
From 2000-2004. Five straight pro bowls, 54-19 as a starter, five straight division titles, 110 TDs against 50 INTs, 16,000 passing yards, and rushed for another 2,000 with 21 TDs. His peak was no doubt HOF.
His inaccuracy is overplayed. He isn't Manning but he sure as hell isn't J-Russ.
Least-intercepted quarterback per pass attempt of all time (4588 attempts-96 interceptions, 2.09%)
His WR corps have been mediocre for much of his career too.
1999 - 5-11
2000 - 11-5
2001 - 11-5
2002 - 12-4
2003 - 12-4
2004 - 13-3
2005 - 6-10
2006 - 10-6
2007 - 8-8
2008 - 9-6
2009 - 11-5
I think McNabb is still a great quarterback. Much less a dual-threat than before but still can get it done through the air. If Spagnolo is concerned about showing improvement and keeping his job, he needs to trade his second round pick for McNabb and select Suh or McCoy with the first overall selection. The Rams can find their quarterback of the future next year.
From 2000-2004. Five straight pro bowls, 54-19 as a starter, five straight division titles, 110 TDs against 50 INTs, 16,000 passing yards, and rushed for another 2,000 with 21 TDs. His peak was no doubt HOF.
His inaccuracy is overplayed. He isn't Manning but he sure as hell isn't J-Russ.
Least-intercepted quarterback per pass attempt of all time (4588 attempts-96 interceptions, 2.09%)
His WR corps have been mediocre for much of his career too.
1999 - 5-11
2000 - 11-5
2001 - 11-5
2002 - 12-4
2003 - 12-4
2004 - 13-3
2005 - 6-10
2006 - 10-6
2007 - 8-8
2008 - 9-6
2009 - 11-5
I think McNabb is still a great quarterback. Much less a dual-threat than before but still can get it done through the air. If Spagnolo is concerned about showing improvement and keeping his job, he needs to trade his second round pick for McNabb and select Suh or McCoy with the first overall selection. The Rams can find their quarterback of the future next year.
-
Faceman
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 4800
- Joined: May 23 06, 11:56 am
- Location: Memphis, TN
Re: Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread
I don't get the McNabb bashing. At all.
- cardsfansince82
- is shooing asian children away from his fridge.
- Posts: 27776
- Joined: May 17 06, 10:23 pm
- Location: at the gettin' place
Re: Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread
At his peak he was a top 5 QB, but he's not anymore. I have nothing against him personally but I think his skills have been overstated all along and he should have at least one Super Bowl ring out of all the good teams he played on. My opinion of him is irrelevant though.
The point is it makes no sense for a mediocre or bad team to go after him. He's on the downside of his career arc. He could take an already good team to the playoffs and lose, but he's not going to magically lift a crappy team to new heights. What is the point of the Rams paying him 12 million to get 4 wins?
The point is it makes no sense for a mediocre or bad team to go after him. He's on the downside of his career arc. He could take an already good team to the playoffs and lose, but he's not going to magically lift a crappy team to new heights. What is the point of the Rams paying him 12 million to get 4 wins?


