Corporate Speak

The forum for ranting, raving, complaining and praising
Post Reply
User avatar
TAZ
Veteran Player
Posts: 714
Joined: November 8 06, 6:35 pm
Location: O'Fallon, Missouri

Re: Corporate Speak

Post by TAZ »

From The Daily Show's Earth, the (audio)Book, here's a segment...

"The Memo"
(Spoken by Samantha Bee)
"It is my understanding that some team members are experiencing a non-satisfactory level of disconnect, vis-à-vis our interpersonel messaging. To ensure we're all on the same page with our ducks in a row, we're opening the kimono to initiate a global refresh on FTF and e-munication standards, therefore, FYI, FFR, interface, dialogue, touchbase, face-to-face, connect, and advise indicate interpersonal communication. Execute, implement, leverage, facilitate, synergize, deliver, and exploit pertain to the performance of work. Robust, value-rich, seamless, best of read and user-centric denote merititorious quality. Further to enhighten our task simplicity quotient, the revealing of which could result in significant new awareness of human capital redundancy and attendant downsizing, all comms should going forward be both redundant and repetitive, with the occasional word-vention utilized in place of vocables of greater brevity, clarity, and bra verity. Augment with "occasional impenetrable acronyms" (OIAs), these syntactical enhancements add perceived value to each employee's personal brand. Exemplifications are under posted:
1. I want to circle back and interface about how to right-size our head count while still keeping workers incentivized.
2. Due to unforeseen life events, I'll be offline tomorrow, so can we push our interlock until post all-hands?
3. At the end of the day, net net, if we have a joint brown bag to come to agreeance on how to grow mind-share among targeted thought leaders by implementing best practices across the board, we can marketeer our wage ward synergizing a frictionless sales environment."

Translation of "The Memo"
(Spoken by Wyatt Cynak)
"Hey dumb [expletive], 90% of the stuff we say basically means either "talk", "make" or "good". But nobody pays fat salaries for talking about making good things. So to keep our scam going only use ungainly words and always 3 times as many of them as a normal person. Like you just heard:
1. Let’s discuss how we can fire people without making the ones we keep cry.
2. My uncle died, can we meet later?
3. Lunch?"

User avatar
G. Keenan
Sucking on the Rally Nipple
Posts: 23718
Joined: April 16 06, 6:03 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Corporate Speak

Post by G. Keenan »

Just came across this gem in an article about the onerous burdens the city of Chicago has started putting on festival organizers.
The meeting was one of several “cultural focus groups” the city is convening as the next step in the much-ballyhooed process of compiling the Emanuel administration’s Cultural Plan, the first since Mayor Harold Washington in 1986. Then, there was “a major emphasis on public engagement,” with more than 200 community meetings seeking input before the old plan was written. This time, there will be about 30 as part of the “ground-truthing” effort—that’s consultant-speak for fact-finding—including the public community meetings that already have been held and a half-dozen smaller invite-only “sector sessions” such as Monday’s on festivals.
How does whoever came up with that look themselves in the mirror?

Arthur Dent
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12536
Joined: April 25 06, 6:43 pm
Location: Austin

Re: Corporate Speak

Post by Arthur Dent »

G. Keenan wrote:"High-energy team players to work in a fast-paced, deadline-driven environment"

That description appears in 99.9% of job listings.
Is that line intended to attract job seekers or to warm them that the workplace is going to suck?

User avatar
G. Keenan
Sucking on the Rally Nipple
Posts: 23718
Joined: April 16 06, 6:03 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Corporate Speak

Post by G. Keenan »

Arthur Dent wrote:
G. Keenan wrote:"High-energy team players to work in a fast-paced, deadline-driven environment"

That description appears in 99.9% of job listings.
Is that line intended to attract job seekers or to warm them that the workplace is going to suck?
It's got to be the latter, right? I swear, I've seen that exact phrasing in listings for everything from coffee shops to the American Bar Association.

jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: Corporate Speak

Post by jim »

Onerous? What the [expletive] is that?

User avatar
G. Keenan
Sucking on the Rally Nipple
Posts: 23718
Joined: April 16 06, 6:03 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Corporate Speak

Post by G. Keenan »

jim wrote:Onerous? What the [expletive] is that?
You know what it is.

User avatar
wart57
just can't quit you.
Posts: 25075
Joined: April 18 06, 4:33 pm
Location: Lost

Re: Corporate Speak

Post by wart57 »

G. Keenan wrote:Just came across this gem in an article about the onerous burdens the city of Chicago has started putting on festival organizers.
The meeting was one of several “cultural focus groups” the city is convening as the next step in the much-ballyhooed process of compiling the Emanuel administration’s Cultural Plan, the first since Mayor Harold Washington in 1986. Then, there was “a major emphasis on public engagement,” with more than 200 community meetings seeking input before the old plan was written. This time, there will be about 30 as part of the “ground-truthing” effort—that’s consultant-speak for fact-finding—including the public community meetings that already have been held and a half-dozen smaller invite-only “sector sessions” such as Monday’s on festivals.
How does whoever came up with that look themselves in the mirror?
With a common vision....

jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: Corporate Speak

Post by jim »

G. Keenan wrote:
jim wrote:Onerous? What the [expletive] is that?
You know what it is.
I do now .. it's my word of the day.
on·er·ous   [on-er-uhs, oh-ner-]
adjective
1.burdensome, oppressive, or troublesome; causing hardship: onerous duties.
2.having or involving obligations or responsibilities, especially legal ones, that outweigh the advantages: an onerous agreement.

I'm going to use that word today at work .... Your requirements are onerous so [expletive] off. Onerous.

User avatar
Radbird
There's someone in my head but it's not me
Posts: 62022
Joined: April 18 06, 5:08 pm
Location: LF Bleachers @ Busch II

Re: Corporate Speak

Post by Radbird »

If I had to choose one word to describe my current job, it would be onerous.

User avatar
Radbird
There's someone in my head but it's not me
Posts: 62022
Joined: April 18 06, 5:08 pm
Location: LF Bleachers @ Busch II

Re: Corporate Speak

Post by Radbird »

On a conference call right now. In response to someone asking if an issue was being worked, this guy said "Yes, it's being efforted."

:-k

Post Reply