Mizzou football 2010

A forum for non-baseball sports
Post Reply
User avatar
cardsfansince82
is shooing asian children away from his fridge.
Posts: 27776
Joined: May 17 06, 10:23 pm
Location: at the gettin' place

Re: Mizzou football 2010

Post by cardsfansince82 »

Random stuff I've come across:

Illinois WR Jarred Fayson 6-0, 215, Sr., Tampa, Fla.
Bench-presses 405 pounds, squats 500 pounds, power cleans 352 pounds
Runs the 40-yard dash in 4.4 seconds
Has just four percent body fat

Mizzou's Chris Freeman has a 28 inch vertical jump. Big [expletive] deal right? Except he's an offensive tackle listed at 6' 8" 350 pounds. This kid could have NFL talent with that body.

User avatar
StL Dan
banned
Posts: 8159
Joined: June 14 06, 9:40 pm
Location: St. Louis in spirit

Re: Mizzou football 2010

Post by StL Dan »

Fan Day was incredible....will post some pix later this week.

User avatar
StL Dan
banned
Posts: 8159
Joined: June 14 06, 9:40 pm
Location: St. Louis in spirit

Re: Mizzou football 2010

Post by StL Dan »

Old news....WR Jarrell Jackson breaks bone in wrist yesterday....will miss rest of camp and first two games of season...TJ Moe is expected to win the starting slot position vacated by JJ.

User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: Mizzou football 2010

Post by JL21 »

I'm sure TT already knows about it, but the rest of you might not. Rock M Nation is doing a series of "Wisdom of the Crowds" polls for each week of the season to get a general projection of where Rock M followers feel Big XII teams will finish in 2010.

http://www.rockmnation.com/2010/8/18/16 ... -week-four

They're only on week four so there's still plenty of time to get involved.

User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37260
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: Mizzou football 2010

Post by lukethedrifter »

I'm a little concerned by this year's receiving corps.

User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: Mizzou football 2010

Post by JL21 »

lukethedrifter wrote:I'm a little concerned by this year's receiving corps.
I'm conflicted by the WR's. There's no beast like they've had with Maclin/Coffman and then Alexander. But they seem awfully deep at the position, even with the injury to Jackson. I think they're even deeper there than they've been in years past. Most of the accounts I'm reading of the practices so far indicate that some of the freshman are looking like contributors and that TJ Moe has taken some steps forward. That's in addition to Jackson (who's supposed to only miss the first game or two) and Kemp and Rolandis Woodland. The TE's or whatever they're called in the Mizzou offense- Egnew and Andrew Jones- should be rock solid.

User avatar
Transmogrified Tiger
Puppy Murderer
Posts: 9323
Joined: April 25 06, 6:07 pm
Location: Across the River

Re: Mizzou football 2010

Post by Transmogrified Tiger »

There is an insane amount of depth in the WR corps. Jackson's injury may be a blessing in disguise because it'll give some more in-game snaps to help determine which of the 8 guys fighting for 1.5 spots are worthy of playing time, and in a lower stress environment since Mizzou is favored in it's first 4 games at least.

User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37260
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: Mizzou football 2010

Post by lukethedrifter »

Transmogrified Tiger wrote:There is an insane amount of depth in the WR corps. Jackson's injury may be a blessing in disguise because it'll give some more in-game snaps to help determine which of the 8 guys fighting for 1.5 spots are worthy of playing time, and in a lower stress environment since Mizzou is favored in it's first 4 games at least.
Isn't TJ Moe expected to start? And he's basically an "athlete" as far as position goes. Anyway, I'm a Mizzou fan not a Texas or OU fan so I should expect problems.

User avatar
Transmogrified Tiger
Puppy Murderer
Posts: 9323
Joined: April 25 06, 6:07 pm
Location: Across the River

Re: Mizzou football 2010

Post by Transmogrified Tiger »

lukethedrifter wrote:
Transmogrified Tiger wrote:There is an insane amount of depth in the WR corps. Jackson's injury may be a blessing in disguise because it'll give some more in-game snaps to help determine which of the 8 guys fighting for 1.5 spots are worthy of playing time, and in a lower stress environment since Mizzou is favored in it's first 4 games at least.
Isn't TJ Moe expected to start? And he's basically an "athlete" as far as position goes. Anyway, I'm a Mizzou fan not a Texas or OU fan so I should expect problems.
Yeah, Moe looks like he's starting in the slot. Dave Matter insinuated that Moe could lead the Big 12 in receptions with as much as Gabbert has been targeting him in camp.

User avatar
cardsfansince82
is shooing asian children away from his fridge.
Posts: 27776
Joined: May 17 06, 10:23 pm
Location: at the gettin' place

Re: Mizzou football 2010

Post by cardsfansince82 »

The receivers will be fine. They don't have big time talent but they do have quality depth and there won't be much drop off when there are substitutions or injuries. Jackson is the best candidate to be a big play guy so they need him back at some point. JL: I still think TE will be the weakest link on offense. Jones has never really impressed me, but I suppose he could have taken some steps forward this offseason. I've read some good things about Egnew, but I always take camp stories in any sport with a grain of salt. After all, I just read several quotes about how the secondary will have zero problems with confidence this year.

Sounds like Kemp is on his way down the depth chart. He didn't catch a single ball in the scrimmage and I think the water boy caught 3 for 25 yards.

Post Reply