Mizzou football 2010
- JL21
- NPR & THT Contributor
- Posts: 36109
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
- Location: Chocolate City
Mizzou football 2010
We're about a month out from the Arch Rivalry game. It's officially time to get excited for college football.
That four game stretch they have mid-season- aTm, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas Tech- is going to make or break their whole season. I'll be happy with two wins there. Any one of them is winnable but they could legitimately be the underdog in three of those games.
That four game stretch they have mid-season- aTm, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas Tech- is going to make or break their whole season. I'll be happy with two wins there. Any one of them is winnable but they could legitimately be the underdog in three of those games.
- Lesson
- Grandmaster Flashchat
- Posts: 6630
- Joined: February 4 10, 4:35 pm
Re: Mizzou football 2010
I see Mizzou winning the aTm and Texas Tech games, with Oklahoma and Nebraska being a push. If it wasn't for Suh, Mizzou would have beaten Nebraska last year.JL21 wrote:We're about a month out from the Arch Rivalry game. It's officially time to get excited for college football.
That four game stretch they have mid-season- aTm, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas Tech- is going to make or break their whole season. I'll be happy with two wins there. Any one of them is winnable but they could legitimately be the underdog in three of those games.
- BigDCardlvr
- All-Star
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: May 19 06, 11:54 pm
Re: Mizzou football 2010
I'm excited too. I think Blaine is gonna have a good year and I think they are gonna surprise some in the B12 this year. I'm also watchin' Franklin to see how he progresses
-
albertmvpujols
- All-Star
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: April 19 06, 7:03 am
- Location: San Diego
- Contact:
Re: Mizzou football 2010
Probably, but that Nebraska defense is/was stout even disregarding Suh. The problem is their offense is really really bad. If I had to guess right now I'd guess they only win in Lubbock. That's a tough four game stretch, but if they can take two of those the rest of the schedule is light. While I'd be content with 8-4, I think the goal should be 9-3 this year and anything above that is gravy.cardslesson101 wrote:I see Mizzou winning the aTm and Texas Tech games, with Oklahoma and Nebraska being a push. If it wasn't for Suh, Mizzou would have beaten Nebraska last year.JL21 wrote:We're about a month out from the Arch Rivalry game. It's officially time to get excited for college football.
That four game stretch they have mid-season- aTm, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas Tech- is going to make or break their whole season. I'll be happy with two wins there. Any one of them is winnable but they could legitimately be the underdog in three of those games.
- ThatGuy
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 5114
- Joined: October 15 06, 4:40 pm
- Location: Knoxville, TN
Re: Mizzou football 2010
I won't be going this year, as far as I can tell. Very disappointed about that.JL21 wrote:We're about a month out from the Arch Rivalry game. It's officially time to get excited for college football.
- cardsfansince82
- is shooing asian children away from his fridge.
- Posts: 27776
- Joined: May 17 06, 10:23 pm
- Location: at the gettin' place
Re: Mizzou football 2010
Can't wait.
The offense should be very good. Gabbert is going to make the leap and he'll have a lot of options around him. I don't see any big time go to guys, but a lot of decent depth at WR and RB. The O-line should be a strength against all but the best defensive teams. They have some depth and versatility to move guys around there. We really need someone to step up at TE as a possession guy who can move the chains. And for [expletive] sake put in a pro set for short yardage situations and practice the hell out of it. I'm sick of seeing them have to pass on 3rd and 2 or run that same read option every time out of shotgun that never works. Washington is supposed to be in great shape and has some good backups so lets run the ball some more.
Defensively, I'm excited to see if Aldon Smith can continue to develop. He'll draw a lot more attention so his numbers may fall off a bit, but the whole defense will benefit. Sure would be nice to have Sheldon Richardson too. The linebackers should be solid but not spectacular. They should be fine against the run overall. As always, what will the secondary do? They are all a year older, but did they have enough talent to begin with? Hopefully some of the younger guys step up and pressure last year's group for PT. Just cut down on the big plays is all I'm asking.
The offense should be good with Gabbert healthy. Maybe not outscore last year's team with Alexander's ridiculous production but more consistent at sustaining drives. The defense can't be any worse, so if they improve a bit I think the team is better overall. And the schedule is very manageable even with that one tough stretch. I think winning the Big XII North is very reasonable, with 9-3 the target and 10-2 a decent possibility.
The offense should be very good. Gabbert is going to make the leap and he'll have a lot of options around him. I don't see any big time go to guys, but a lot of decent depth at WR and RB. The O-line should be a strength against all but the best defensive teams. They have some depth and versatility to move guys around there. We really need someone to step up at TE as a possession guy who can move the chains. And for [expletive] sake put in a pro set for short yardage situations and practice the hell out of it. I'm sick of seeing them have to pass on 3rd and 2 or run that same read option every time out of shotgun that never works. Washington is supposed to be in great shape and has some good backups so lets run the ball some more.
Defensively, I'm excited to see if Aldon Smith can continue to develop. He'll draw a lot more attention so his numbers may fall off a bit, but the whole defense will benefit. Sure would be nice to have Sheldon Richardson too. The linebackers should be solid but not spectacular. They should be fine against the run overall. As always, what will the secondary do? They are all a year older, but did they have enough talent to begin with? Hopefully some of the younger guys step up and pressure last year's group for PT. Just cut down on the big plays is all I'm asking.
The offense should be good with Gabbert healthy. Maybe not outscore last year's team with Alexander's ridiculous production but more consistent at sustaining drives. The defense can't be any worse, so if they improve a bit I think the team is better overall. And the schedule is very manageable even with that one tough stretch. I think winning the Big XII North is very reasonable, with 9-3 the target and 10-2 a decent possibility.
- StL Dan
- banned
- Posts: 8159
- Joined: June 14 06, 9:40 pm
- Location: St. Louis in spirit
Re: Mizzou football 2010
I'm taking the family to Fan Day in CoMO this coming weekend. Can't wait!
-
Vidor
- You've just been hit by...VidorSmarm™
- Posts: 22956
- Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm
Re: Mizzou football 2010
When is a good time to start general college football threads? And do you go weekly or monthly?
- JL21
- NPR & THT Contributor
- Posts: 36109
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
- Location: Chocolate City
Re: Mizzou football 2010
Go ahead and fire one up now, if you'd like.Vidor wrote:When is a good time to start general college football threads? And do you go weekly or monthly?
- cardsfansince82
- is shooing asian children away from his fridge.
- Posts: 27776
- Joined: May 17 06, 10:23 pm
- Location: at the gettin' place
Re: Mizzou football 2010
We usually have a general thread plus a Mizzou thread for the whole season. I've usually started a weekly thread to give people the heads up on all the televised games and discuss specific matchups, or someone will have a weekly picks thread. Basically do whatever.Vidor wrote:When is a good time to start general college football threads? And do you go weekly or monthly?


