Indians to host Angels in Milwaukee

Discuss all things Cardinals Baseball
TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20007
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Post by TimeForGuinness »

Leroy wrote:So it will be the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim against the Milwaukee Indians of Cleveland? :shock:
lol.

Jocephus
99% conan clips
Posts: 64992
Joined: April 18 06, 5:14 pm

Post by Jocephus »

Wayne Campbell: So, do you come to Milwaukee often?
Alice Cooper: Well, I'm a regular visitor here, but Milwaukee has certainly had its share of visitors. The French missionaries and explorers began visiting here in the late 16th century.
Pete: Hey, isn't "Milwaukee" an Indian name?
Alice Cooper: Yes, Pete, it is. In fact , it's pronounced "mill-e-wah-que" which is Algonquin for "the good land."
Wayne Campbell: I was not aware of that.

User avatar
Transmogrified Tiger
Puppy Murderer
Posts: 9323
Joined: April 25 06, 6:07 pm
Location: Across the River

Post by Transmogrified Tiger »

RC21 wrote:
mcgee51taguchi99 wrote:
RC21 wrote:If I was the Indians, I'd be really angry about that. Do you know how much money the team loses just in gate money alone when they lose a home game?
It's better than playing 53 games in July.
Wouldn't the natural solution be to play these 3 in LA, and then flip-flop the later series in LA to Cleveland? Or maybe they only play each other this one time. Either way, the Tribe is gonna lose a ton of scratch on the deal.
Then you piss off all the fans who bought tickets to the LA series who can't make it there for a series starting tomorrow.

User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Post by JL21 »

Transmogrified Tiger wrote:
RC21 wrote:
mcgee51taguchi99 wrote:
RC21 wrote:If I was the Indians, I'd be really angry about that. Do you know how much money the team loses just in gate money alone when they lose a home game?
It's better than playing 53 games in July.
Wouldn't the natural solution be to play these 3 in LA, and then flip-flop the later series in LA to Cleveland? Or maybe they only play each other this one time. Either way, the Tribe is gonna lose a ton of scratch on the deal.
Then you piss off all the fans who bought tickets to the LA series who can't make it there for a series starting tomorrow.
That's still a TON better than taking away 2% of a team's gameday revenue for a season.

There is no optimal scenario, but I'm quite sure that taking 3 games away from the Indians is not the best.

User avatar
indyredbird
All-Star
Posts: 1336
Joined: September 26 06, 2:35 pm
Location: Whitestown, IN

Post by indyredbird »

Why not play in Cincy? Or Pittsburgh?

User avatar
mikechamp
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 11690
Joined: April 17 06, 5:05 pm
Location: Southwestern Illinois

Post by mikechamp »

Pittsburgh's park is currently occupied.

However, Cincy does have a vacancy.

My guess is they wanted to insure the games actually happened. A roof will help you do that.

Does Buddy the Commissioner still have some kind of ownership stake in the Brewers?

User avatar
indyredbird
All-Star
Posts: 1336
Joined: September 26 06, 2:35 pm
Location: Whitestown, IN

Post by indyredbird »

mikechamp wrote:Pittsburgh's park is currently occupied.

However, Cincy does have a vacancy.

My guess is they wanted to insure the games actually happened. A roof will help you do that.

Does Buddy the Commissioner still have some kind of ownership stake in the Brewers?
I think his daughter is listed as the official owner. Or at least at one point she was.

User avatar
MrCrowesGarden
'Burb Boy
Posts: 24841
Joined: July 9 06, 11:33 am
Location: Out of the Loop

Post by MrCrowesGarden »

RC21 wrote:
Transmogrified Tiger wrote:
RC21 wrote:
mcgee51taguchi99 wrote:
RC21 wrote:If I was the Indians, I'd be really angry about that. Do you know how much money the team loses just in gate money alone when they lose a home game?
It's better than playing 53 games in July.
Wouldn't the natural solution be to play these 3 in LA, and then flip-flop the later series in LA to Cleveland? Or maybe they only play each other this one time. Either way, the Tribe is gonna lose a ton of scratch on the deal.
Then you piss off all the fans who bought tickets to the LA series who can't make it there for a series starting tomorrow.
That's still a TON better than taking away 2% of a team's gameday revenue for a season.

There is no optimal scenario, but I'm quite sure that taking 3 games away from the Indians is not the best.
I've heard the reason they didn't do that is because the Angels would have then have to fly from Los Angeles to Boston to play the Red Sox without an off day.

AJ

Post by AJ »

Some of you are forgetting that the Indians played the entire 1989 season at Milwaukee's county stadium...... They also played a 1 game playoff against the Yankees there to decide the AL East Title.....

User avatar
Jmodene
Still waiting for someone to use a Weird Al song
Posts: 15528
Joined: April 18 06, 5:54 pm
Location: Las Vegas, NV

Post by Jmodene »

I was just about to mention that - as "Major League" was indeed filmed at Milwaukee County Stadium. The TV station advertisement gives it away, and of course they choreographed Willie Mays Hayes' leaping grap at the wall to duplicate Willie McGee's 1982 WS catch (Game 3) as closely as possible - it's the same wall!

Post Reply