Offical 2010 NFL Season Thread

A forum for non-baseball sports
Post Reply
User avatar
TheoSqua
Next Gen Wart
Posts: 8951
Joined: April 22 06, 6:53 pm
Location: St. Louis
Contact:

Re: Offical 2010 NFL Season Thread

Post by TheoSqua »

Popeye_Card wrote:Well, he didn't really lose it. If he doesn't hold, Romo doesn't have all that time to finally find an open receiver. I guess he could have blocked better to give Romo that same time.
Don't forget he had a penalty that negated a first down and gave them 3rd and 20 in the drive before that, as well. He had 3 penalties in the second half and all three negated key plays.

And yes, if he wasn't out of position in the first two penalties he likely blocks legally, and in the third one if he had even tried to block the guy instead of just put him in a bearhug then a headlock he may have still bought some time.

And the kicker, to me, was immediately after the penalty and the game's over he's walking around the field all smiles and happy talking to a few Redskins players.....yeah, good to see that.

User avatar
TGantz
R-E-S-P-E-C-T...What Dr Pepper Means to Me
Posts: 6698
Joined: July 27 06, 11:59 pm
Location: The Lou

Re: Offical 2010 NFL Season Thread

Post by TGantz »

vinsanity wrote:
TheoSqua wrote:Seeing Alex Barron basically lose the game for Dallas made me happy for some reason.
Likely cost me my week one in fantasy.
Same here.

User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 31084
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: Offical 2010 NFL Season Thread

Post by Popeye_Card »

I only caught the last series, so I don't know anything of the earlier penalties.

My point was just that the hold gave Romo an extra couple of seconds to make the throw that he did, after the play was already running a bit long (IIRC). No hold, no play. And to be fair, Barron's was just the most outrageous of the 4 or so holds being conducted simultaneously.

User avatar
vinsanity
Chili dog truther
Posts: 8836
Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
Location: Indianapolis

Re: Offical 2010 NFL Season Thread

Post by vinsanity »

Is there a QB Controversy in Philly?

Do you guys go with Vick who looked pretty sharp yesterday or Kolb?

Jocephus
99% conan clips
Posts: 64992
Joined: April 18 06, 5:14 pm

Re: Offical 2010 NFL Season Thread

Post by Jocephus »

vick

User avatar
Radio_Bugtussle
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 3450
Joined: July 26 06, 9:51 am
Location: Searching for the perfect microbrew

Re: Offical 2010 NFL Season Thread

Post by Radio_Bugtussle »

Socnorb11 wrote:
stlouie_lipp wrote:My Steelers survive to win in OT! And, I had Mendenhall going!

That Megatron non-touchdown call was bull, but I guess it was according to the rules. This guy didn't like the call (NSFW language)

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGX2q_ee ... r_embedded][/youtube]

Saying "it's the rule" is fine, but if they're never going to call it that way, and then suddenly pull it out of their a** on a critical play at the end of the game, it's a bogus call.
If the WR catches the ball and puts it away like it's taught from day 1 of peewee football, he's got a touchdown. Instead, this goof felt compelled to wave the ball around and ham it up for the various highlight shows. Bad fundamentals.

User avatar
InvincibleCakeEater
GRB's obsessive compulsive baseball poster
Posts: 28275
Joined: October 12 07, 12:28 pm
Location: Raptured

Re: Offical 2010 NFL Season Thread

Post by InvincibleCakeEater »

As long as the Chiefs don't get absolutely embarrassed I'll be happy.

User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: Offical 2010 NFL Season Thread

Post by JL21 »

Radio_Bugtussle wrote:Instead, this goof felt compelled to wave the ball around and ham it up for the various highlight shows. Bad fundamentals.
I'm having a hard time buying this. He made the catch as he was getting drilled and had fractions of a second to decide what he was going to do next. He could either:

a) Put his hand down to brace his fall. It just so happens that there was a ball in it.

b) Start celebrating by waving the ball around/slamming it down/etc.

Given that he had fractions of a second, which do you think was more instinctual?

User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37260
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: Offical 2010 NFL Season Thread

Post by lukethedrifter »

Popeye_Card wrote:I only caught the last series, so I don't know anything of the earlier penalties.

My point was just that the hold gave Romo an extra couple of seconds to make the throw that he did, after the play was already running a bit long (IIRC). No hold, no play. And to be fair, Barron's was just the most outrageous of the 4 or so holds being conducted simultaneously.

Barron was in the position of needing to hold to give Romo the few extra seconds because he is a bad tackle and the DE blew by him. Thus he gets no slack.

User avatar
stlouie_lipp
Hallelujah Brother
Posts: 13380
Joined: April 17 06, 7:36 pm

Re: Offical 2010 NFL Season Thread

Post by stlouie_lipp »

JL21 wrote:
Radio_Bugtussle wrote:Instead, this goof felt compelled to wave the ball around and ham it up for the various highlight shows. Bad fundamentals.
I'm having a hard time buying this. He made the catch as he was getting drilled and had fractions of a second to decide what he was going to do next. He could either:

a) Put his hand down to brace his fall. It just so happens that there was a ball in it.

b) Start celebrating by waving the ball around/slamming it down/etc.

Given that he had fractions of a second, which do you think was more instinctual?
correct.

where exactly did he ham it up?

Post Reply