St. Louis Blues 2010 Offseason Thread

A forum for non-baseball sports
Post Reply
User avatar
Lesson
Grandmaster Flashchat
Posts: 6630
Joined: February 4 10, 4:35 pm

Re: St. Louis Blues 2010 Offseason Thread

Post by Lesson »

The Blues have finally answered the debate about which enforcer they will keep.

The club, which re-signed Cam Janssen earlier this offseason, has re-signed D.J. King and now has a trade pending to send him to the Washington Capitals.

The deal is expected to be announced soon. The player(s) the Blues are getting in return is not yet known.

King, who was a restricted free agent, apparently signed a two-year contract extension with the Blues in order for the trade to happen. Terms weren't immediately available.

King, 26, was a sixth-round draft pick (190th overall) of the Blues in 2002. He's played in 101 NHL games, posting four goals, nine points and 185 penalty minutes.

King has played in only 13 games the past two seasons. In 2008-09, he suffered a shoulder injury in his first game of the season and required season-ending surgery. Last season, in his first game of the year, he broke his hand in a fight with Dallas' Krys Barch. He returned to play 11 more games down the stretch.

King's departure means the Blues will employ Janssen as their top enforcer. The Eureka native recently signed a one-year, $600,000 contract extension.
http://www.stltoday.com/sports/hockey/p ... 2bc8b.html

User avatar
MrCrowesGarden
'Burb Boy
Posts: 24841
Joined: July 9 06, 11:33 am
Location: Out of the Loop

Re: St. Louis Blues 2010 Offseason Thread

Post by MrCrowesGarden »

The Blues are getting back Stefan Della Rovere, rated as the Caps 11th best prospect from Hockey's Future. Looks like he's a good agitator with at least a little scoring touch.

User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 31084
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: St. Louis Blues 2010 Offseason Thread

Post by Popeye_Card »

IMO, the Blues chose...poorly.

User avatar
Lesson
Grandmaster Flashchat
Posts: 6630
Joined: February 4 10, 4:35 pm

Re: St. Louis Blues 2010 Offseason Thread

Post by Lesson »

Popeye_Card wrote:IMO, the Blues chose...poorly.
So, you wish they would have traded Cam instead of D.J?

User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 31084
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: St. Louis Blues 2010 Offseason Thread

Post by Popeye_Card »

Yes. Though it has been pretty clear all along that they'd keep the local kid, which is probably what made King a little ticked.

King is a difference maker as an enforcer. A guy teams are actually afraid to fight. He also hits better than Cam, while both of their games outside of that are poor.

If you are going to skate an enforcer, then have a real enforcer. Cam is little more than an agitator, but that is of little value if he provides 0 offensively or defensively. Sure, Cam fights, but he isn't in DJ's class.

User avatar
thrill
bronoun enthusiast
Posts: 30539
Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
Location: barely online

Re: St. Louis Blues 2010 Offseason Thread

Post by thrill »

How about just not wasting a roster spot on someone who can't skate, shoot or pass.

User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 31084
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: St. Louis Blues 2010 Offseason Thread

Post by Popeye_Card »

I'm good with that too.

But if you're going to carry an enforcer, then my choice would have been King.

I will freely admit that while it didn't make much hockey sense, I loved when King was in the lineup. Always a chance of seeing a classic ass-whooping.

User avatar
MrCrowesGarden
'Burb Boy
Posts: 24841
Joined: July 9 06, 11:33 am
Location: Out of the Loop

Re: St. Louis Blues 2010 Offseason Thread

Post by MrCrowesGarden »

They might have kept the wrong guy, but they did get a good return at least.

User avatar
TheoSqua
Next Gen Wart
Posts: 8951
Joined: April 22 06, 6:53 pm
Location: St. Louis
Contact:

Re: St. Louis Blues 2010 Offseason Thread

Post by TheoSqua »

Popeye_Card wrote:I'm good with that too.

But if you're going to carry an enforcer, then my choice would have been King.

I will freely admit that while it didn't make much hockey sense, I loved when King was in the lineup. Always a chance of seeing a classic ass-whooping.
I'd rather have Janssen + this new guy. Especially considering that King was being difficult about signing a contract and Janssen was pretty easy to sign. I bet if King had been OK with a 1 year 600k deal a month ago like Cam this deal would look a bit different.

User avatar
st.lewis11
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 15773
Joined: June 14 06, 10:17 pm
Location: Small southern IL town, 40 min from STL

Re: St. Louis Blues 2010 Offseason Thread

Post by st.lewis11 »

TheoSqua wrote:
Popeye_Card wrote:I'm good with that too.

But if you're going to carry an enforcer, then my choice would have been King.

I will freely admit that while it didn't make much hockey sense, I loved when King was in the lineup. Always a chance of seeing a classic ass-whooping.
I'd rather have Janssen + this new guy. Especially considering that King was being difficult about signing a contract and Janssen was pretty easy to sign. I bet if King had been OK with a 1 year 600k deal a month ago like Cam this deal would look a bit different.
If we could've pulled it off, I would've preferred King + the new guy. I agree with Popeye about King as an enforcer. Janseen is not an enforcer, he's an agitator. Players aren't afraid of him, at least not as much as King.
But Theo was also right in his points over the situation of the contract issues.

Post Reply