NBA Offseason Thread.
- thrill
- bronoun enthusiast
- Posts: 30539
- Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
- Location: barely online
Re: NBA Offseason Thread.
Two max slots now, [expletive]!
- vinsanity
- Chili dog truther
- Posts: 8836
- Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
- Location: Indianapolis
Re: NBA Offseason Thread.
I'm just glad Heyward was gone before 10. That woulda been interesting to say the least.
- stlouie_lipp
- Hallelujah Brother
- Posts: 13380
- Joined: April 17 06, 7:36 pm
Re: NBA Offseason Thread.
I feel like a Yankee fan.thrill wrote:Two max slots now, [expletive]!
-
Socnorb11
- The Last Word
- Posts: 21908
- Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am
Re: NBA Offseason Thread.
If you're the Bulls, I don't understand not using the first round pick. Put another elite young player next to Rose, and add an elite free agent, and that's a pretty exciting team.
- stlouie_lipp
- Hallelujah Brother
- Posts: 13380
- Joined: April 17 06, 7:36 pm
Re: NBA Offseason Thread.
The added cap room for another max contract is a million times more valuable than the 17th pick in a mediocre draft. I think James + Bosh/Johnson is a more exciting team.Socnorb11 wrote:If you're the Bulls, I don't understand not using the first round pick. Put another elite young player next to Rose, and add an elite free agent, and that's a pretty exciting team.
-
Socnorb11
- The Last Word
- Posts: 21908
- Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am
Re: NBA Offseason Thread.
The problem is that there are at least a few teams with cap space to lure a Bosh, or a Johnson, or a Lebron (in Miami's case, they could probably lure a couple of those guys. Assuming that Chicago is going to have the pick of the litter is a little risky. It's not just a matter of "clear cap space, sign who we want, win a championship".stlouie_lipp wrote:The added cap room for another max contract is a million times more valuable than the 17th pick in a mediocre draft. I think James + Bosh/Johnson is a more exciting team.Socnorb11 wrote:If you're the Bulls, I don't understand not using the first round pick. Put another elite young player next to Rose, and add an elite free agent, and that's a pretty exciting team.
- vinsanity
- Chili dog truther
- Posts: 8836
- Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
- Location: Indianapolis
Re: NBA Offseason Thread.
Carmello is a FA next year isn't he? If you can't land two max contract guys this year, could you sign a 1 year deal withs omeone, and go after Mello next year?Socnorb11 wrote:The problem is that there are at least a few teams with cap space to lure a Bosh, or a Johnson, or a Lebron (in Miami's case, they could probably lure a couple of those guys. Assuming that Chicago is going to have the pick of the litter is a little risky. It's not just a matter of "clear cap space, sign who we want, win a championship".stlouie_lipp wrote:The added cap room for another max contract is a million times more valuable than the 17th pick in a mediocre draft. I think James + Bosh/Johnson is a more exciting team.Socnorb11 wrote:If you're the Bulls, I don't understand not using the first round pick. Put another elite young player next to Rose, and add an elite free agent, and that's a pretty exciting team.
-
Socnorb11
- The Last Word
- Posts: 21908
- Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am
Re: NBA Offseason Thread.
The Nuggets are reportedly working on an extension with Carmelo right now, so I wouldn't count on that.vinsanity wrote:Carmello is a FA next year isn't he? If you can't land two max contract guys this year, could you sign a 1 year deal withs omeone, and go after Mello next year?Socnorb11 wrote:The problem is that there are at least a few teams with cap space to lure a Bosh, or a Johnson, or a Lebron (in Miami's case, they could probably lure a couple of those guys. Assuming that Chicago is going to have the pick of the litter is a little risky. It's not just a matter of "clear cap space, sign who we want, win a championship".stlouie_lipp wrote:The added cap room for another max contract is a million times more valuable than the 17th pick in a mediocre draft. I think James + Bosh/Johnson is a more exciting team.Socnorb11 wrote:If you're the Bulls, I don't understand not using the first round pick. Put another elite young player next to Rose, and add an elite free agent, and that's a pretty exciting team.
I believe Durant is a free agent next year though, so that may be something to consider.
I don't know. I guess my philosophy is to draft well, sign one of the elite free agents available, and see what happens.
- vinsanity
- Chili dog truther
- Posts: 8836
- Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
- Location: Indianapolis
Re: NBA Offseason Thread.
Gotcha. There's definitely something to be said for drafting well...Rondo comes to mind.Socnorb11 wrote:The Nuggets are reportedly working on an extension with Carmelo right now, so I wouldn't count on that.
I believe Durant is a free agent next year though, so that may be something to consider.
I don't know. I guess my philosophy is to draft well, sign one of the elite free agents available, and see what happens.
Sometimes I think you gotta swing for the fences. I don't know much about Henrich (just recently dabbling in NBA stuff). Some said they were going to move him to the pacers - and he's listed as a G on ESPN. So is he PG or SG? I know the Pacers are desperate for a C and a PG (from my understanding on local radio).
So color me surprised when they drafted a Forward.
- TabascoElvis
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 5728
- Joined: June 15 06, 8:29 am
- Location: Library of Congress? Detroit? Beyond the sun?
Re: NBA Offseason Thread.
Hinrich can play both pretty much equally well.vinsanity wrote:Gotcha. There's definitely something to be said for drafting well...Rondo comes to mind.Socnorb11 wrote:The Nuggets are reportedly working on an extension with Carmelo right now, so I wouldn't count on that.
I believe Durant is a free agent next year though, so that may be something to consider.
I don't know. I guess my philosophy is to draft well, sign one of the elite free agents available, and see what happens.
Sometimes I think you gotta swing for the fences. I don't know much about Henrich (just recently dabbling in NBA stuff). Some said they were going to move him to the pacers - and he's listed as a G on ESPN. So is he PG or SG? I know the Pacers are desperate for a C and a PG (from my understanding on local radio).
So color me surprised when they drafted a Forward.


