World Cup 2010

A forum for non-baseball sports
Post Reply
User avatar
fanforever
Retired
Posts: 67125
Joined: April 17 06, 5:03 pm
Location: Northern NJ-The Twilight Zone

Re: World Cup 2010

Post by fanforever »

Germany always had great soccer teams. Franz Beckenbauer is one of my favorites soccer players of all time.

User avatar
Tambourine Man
accepts no jimitators
Posts: 11413
Joined: April 21 06, 3:31 pm
Location: I Read the News Today Oh, boy

Re: World Cup 2010

Post by Tambourine Man »

PujolJunkie wrote:Australia has looked horrible. Are they this bad of a team or is Germany just a beast?
I barely know these teams but Germany looks like they could play with and beat anyone in the world. Australia's severely outclassed here.

Fat Strat
Official GRB Sponsor of Larry Bigbie
Posts: 28010
Joined: April 17 06, 9:16 pm
Location: No. 16 on the Cards Top 15 Prospect List

Re: World Cup 2010

Post by Fat Strat »

I thought the US should have been Australia 3 or 4 to 0 last week. Germany is better than us. They just finish so well and have such great awareness of where they are going to be on the pitch. Amazing stuff.

Fat Strat
Official GRB Sponsor of Larry Bigbie
Posts: 28010
Joined: April 17 06, 9:16 pm
Location: No. 16 on the Cards Top 15 Prospect List

Re: World Cup 2010

Post by Fat Strat »

They're starting to blame the ball again. Even alluding to the idea that it was the ball that caused the misplay by Green in the US/Eng game.

http://g.sports.yahoo.com/soccer/world- ... 1310W.html

I've watched and played a lot of soccer and I don't care if they were playing with a golf ball, a tennis ball, a billiards ball... Dempsey's shot should have been saved.

And in watching the highlights of the game they reference, I'm not seeing it there either. At no point did the keeper get in front of that ball or get in line with it's path. Maybe he was anticipating it spinning back into him, but a bouncer hit like that one with that force isn't going to spin back to the keeper's arms.

MrSaigon

Re: World Cup 2010

Post by MrSaigon »

I actually saw a ball at the department store today, and it seems kind of weird. Like, not entirely round. But don't they hate the ball every four years? and why don't the just standardize it?

Who could we get from the British for Howard?

jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: World Cup 2010

Post by jim »

Fat Strat wrote:They're starting to blame the ball again. Even alluding to the idea that it was the ball that caused the misplay by Green in the US/Eng game.

http://g.sports.yahoo.com/soccer/world- ... 1310W.html
I think it was the Home Depot garden gloves he was wearing. What the hell is with that by the way? Was he planting tomatoes while the ball was at the other end?

Fat Strat
Official GRB Sponsor of Larry Bigbie
Posts: 28010
Joined: April 17 06, 9:16 pm
Location: No. 16 on the Cards Top 15 Prospect List

Re: World Cup 2010

Post by Fat Strat »

They're padded and "sticky". Soccer balls are generally pretty slick. They're a smooth feel, unlike a basketball or football. It's very difficult to catch anything shot hard with just your bare hands. The rubber pads on the gloves give you a much better grip and give a keeper a chance on even the hardest hit balls.

And they're useful for trimming rose bushes, garden work, and lawn mowing.


Edit: Here's a close up.

Image

jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: World Cup 2010

Post by jim »

Why all the padding? I understand the grippy part.

User avatar
robbotis
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 4791
Joined: April 18 06, 7:05 am
Location: Minneapolis

Re: World Cup 2010

Post by robbotis »

jim wrote:
Fat Strat wrote:
jim wrote:How much "luck" (I hate that word, but I think you know what I mean) is there in soccer. When a 31 plays a 14 in baseball, nobody would be surprised in the least if the 31 ranked team beat the 14th. In soccer I assume it's less likely for "luck" to come into play?
Far less luck, I would think. After all, it wasn't "luck" that scored the US's goal. It was a serious error. You can get a lucky bounce in or touch on a corner every now and then, or a defender could slip and allow an inferior forward to score. A ball can hit a cross bar (see Altidore) or a goalie can guess right on a shot. Luck plays a part, no doubt, but you can usually only keep a good club down for so long.

It would be a real surprise, imo, if either Algeria or Slovenia beat us. A tie is possible with either team, just as it was with England. I think it was obvious that England was the better club today. Well, theoretically, it should be just as obvious or more obvious that America is better than Slovenia and Algeria.
I mean how often do the equivalent of the Pirates beat the equivalent of the Yankees? The Pirates would probably do it 1/3+ of the time. That often in soccer?
The top teams rarley lose in Soccer. I believe Spain, the #1 rated team, hasn't lost but once(to the US), in their last 49 games.

User avatar
thrill
bronoun enthusiast
Posts: 30539
Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
Location: barely online

Re: World Cup 2010

Post by thrill »

jim wrote:Why all the padding? I understand the grippy part.
Because you're catching something that's coming at you around an average of 60 mph.

Post Reply