Big Ten Expansion

A forum for non-baseball sports
Post Reply
User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: Big Ten Expansion

Post by JL21 »

lukethedrifter wrote:
New Pagodi wrote:Here's Nate Silver's take.

Pretty interesting take on things.
It's all predicated on this:
As strong as the SEC already is, I can't imagine that once they've entered expansion mode, that they wouldn't also want to add a Clemson, a Florida State, a Miami or possibly a Georgia Tech -- nor or that some of these schools, especially Clemson and FSU, wouldn't jump at the chance to join them
Those schools add nothing financially to the SEC, which has strong presence in all those states.

User avatar
cardsfansince82
is shooing asian children away from his fridge.
Posts: 27776
Joined: May 17 06, 10:23 pm
Location: at the gettin' place

Re: Big Ten Expansion

Post by cardsfansince82 »

stlouie_lipp wrote:My sources (yes I do have college football sources) tells me that the entire D-1 college football landscape will be changing dramatically in the next two years. The number of D-1 teams is going to be cut and there will be a playoff system.
Yeah, I think that is the goal of this whole thing. Force a playoff system and keep all the money among the big schools. I wonder what it means for the teams that are left out. Do the "superconferences" become their own subdivision or will the TCUs and Boises still have a chance to participate?

User avatar
cardsfansince82
is shooing asian children away from his fridge.
Posts: 27776
Joined: May 17 06, 10:23 pm
Location: at the gettin' place

Re: Big Ten Expansion

Post by cardsfansince82 »

JL21 wrote: It's all predicated on this:
As strong as the SEC already is, I can't imagine that once they've entered expansion mode, that they wouldn't also want to add a Clemson, a Florida State, a Miami or possibly a Georgia Tech -- nor or that some of these schools, especially Clemson and FSU, wouldn't jump at the chance to join them
Those schools add nothing financially to the SEC, which has strong presence in all those states.
In terms of TV revenue, probably not. Although each super conference could have their own network and those schools have some huge fanbases. Either way, the SEC may not have a choice but to expand to be equal with the other conferences and you could do a lot worse than those schools.

User avatar
stlouie_lipp
Hallelujah Brother
Posts: 13380
Joined: April 17 06, 7:36 pm

Re: Big Ten Expansion

Post by stlouie_lipp »

cardsfansince82 wrote:
stlouie_lipp wrote:My sources (yes I do have college football sources) tells me that the entire D-1 college football landscape will be changing dramatically in the next two years. The number of D-1 teams is going to be cut and there will be a playoff system.
Yeah, I think that is the goal of this whole thing. Force a playoff system and keep all the money among the big schools. I wonder what it means for the teams that are left out. Do the "superconferences" become their own subdivision or will the TCUs and Boises still have a chance to participate?
From what I am hearing, all the D-1 teams left standing will have a chance to participate.

User avatar
JoeMcKim
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 9248
Joined: September 8 09, 10:56 pm
Location: South County, St. Louis

Re: Big Ten Expansion

Post by JoeMcKim »

Notre Dame really should be forced to being part of a conference, in this day and age you shouldn't be able to play major college ball without being in some sort of a conference. You can't have your cake and eat it also. If you don't want to play in a conference then you shouldn't be allowed to automatically get into a BCS bowl game just because you finished 9-2.

User avatar
vinsanity
Chili dog truther
Posts: 8836
Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
Location: Indianapolis

Re: Big Ten Expansion

Post by vinsanity »

Orangebloods.com is reporting Texas will commit to stay with the conference formally known as the Big 12.

http://content.usatoday.com/communities ... nference/1

Should the Big 10/Pac 10/Big 12 change their names? I know The Big Ten kept it with 11...but now it doesn't seem like it works. The Bigger 12 maybe?

Faceman
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 4800
Joined: May 23 06, 11:56 am
Location: Memphis, TN

Re: Big Ten Expansion

Post by Faceman »

wow, I guess nobody really knows what Texas is doing.

I'd have to bet on them saving the Big 12. They don't want that PAC 10 commute.

User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: Big Ten Expansion

Post by JL21 »

Faceman wrote:wow, I guess nobody really knows what Texas is doing.

I'd have to bet on them saving the Big 12. They don't want that PAC 10 commute.
Plus they can boss around the rest of the Big XII even more than they had before. They wouldn't have that in the Pac 10. If the Big XII somehow survives losing Nebraska and Colorado, I still think it's on life support. The remaining institutions in the north surely resent Texas' influence and the grandstanding that's happened in all of this.

And yet, other than joining the B16 Ten, this somehow seems like a best case scenario for Mizzou.

User avatar
vinsanity
Chili dog truther
Posts: 8836
Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
Location: Indianapolis

Re: Big Ten Expansion

Post by vinsanity »

JL21 wrote:And yet, other than joining the B16 Ten, this somehow seems like a best case scenario for Mizzou.
I like that B16 Ten. Cause the 6 looks like a G. Can we start calling the Big XII the Little Ten?

Fat Strat
Official GRB Sponsor of Larry Bigbie
Posts: 28010
Joined: April 17 06, 9:16 pm
Location: No. 16 on the Cards Top 15 Prospect List

Re: Big Ten Expansion

Post by Fat Strat »

If Texas is staying (and OU, etc.) then I don't really see the problem here. You can replace Nebraska and Colorado with two from Utah, TCU, BYU, Cincy, or Air Force and move on like nothing really happened. The conference won't be as good as it used to be, but it will still be a top 4-5 conference year in and year out.

Post Reply