Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread

A forum for non-baseball sports
Post Reply
User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37260
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread

Post by lukethedrifter »

Tonight I learned how much I dislike Jon Gruden.

Betcha the Rams will be spending most of the next 16 or whatever hours on the phone.

Socnorb11
The Last Word
Posts: 21909
Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am

Re: Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread

Post by Socnorb11 »

InvincibleCakeEater wrote:The Vikings have to take Claussen, but the Chiefs and Claussen could be interesting. Weiss as the OC.
Cassel isn't the guy?

TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20007
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Re: Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread

Post by TimeForGuinness »

Hindsight being 20/20...Suh + Clausen > Bradford + 2nd round pick for the Rams

User avatar
InvincibleCakeEater
GRB's obsessive compulsive baseball poster
Posts: 28275
Joined: October 12 07, 12:28 pm
Location: Raptured

Re: Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread

Post by InvincibleCakeEater »

Socnorb11 wrote:
InvincibleCakeEater wrote:The Vikings have to take Claussen, but the Chiefs and Claussen could be interesting. Weiss as the OC.
Cassel isn't the guy?
He's the guy signed to a ridiculous contract, but I don't see him as "the guy."

User avatar
docellis
America's Most Beloved Twitter Joke Thief
Posts: 24741
Joined: April 18 06, 6:54 pm

Re: Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread

Post by docellis »

TimeForGuinness wrote:Hindsight being 20/20...Suh + Clausen > Bradford + 2nd round pick for the Rams
that would have been interesting. I wonder if they "could have" done that....

User avatar
Lesson
Grandmaster Flashchat
Posts: 6630
Joined: February 4 10, 4:35 pm

Re: Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread

Post by Lesson »

TimeForGuinness wrote:Hindsight being 20/20...Suh + Clausen > Bradford + 2nd round pick for the Rams
I know that would have given the Rams a QB and Suh but I think if the Rams can block for Bradford and get him a shiny new WR, you could see why they didn't pick Suh, sure, Suh could be a great DT but Bradford could be a great QB. The Rams will get plenty of offer for the 33rd pick, if they don't like what they are offered, they'll either draft a DT, RB or WR. The Lions look like they had a good draft, though.

Socnorb11
The Last Word
Posts: 21909
Joined: June 21 06, 8:45 am

Re: Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread

Post by Socnorb11 »

I think Clausen is going to disappoint. I think the Rams got the best QB in the draft.... by far. I'm just not entirely sure that Suh wouldn't have been the better pick.

User avatar
docellis
America's Most Beloved Twitter Joke Thief
Posts: 24741
Joined: April 18 06, 6:54 pm

Re: Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread

Post by docellis »

So we released Bulger...and we have 2 back ups right now, right? So who starts the first game of the season?

User avatar
Lesson
Grandmaster Flashchat
Posts: 6630
Joined: February 4 10, 4:35 pm

Re: Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread

Post by Lesson »

docellis wrote:So we released Bulger...and we have 2 back ups right now, right? So who starts the first game of the season?
Well, the Rams actually have 3 backups, you're forgetting Reilly. Anyways, I think Bradford will start Week 1. The situation may be similar to the Ravens' situation in 2008, when Flacco beat out Troy Smith in the preseason against the Rams because Smith was sick. Expect a training camp battle for the starting job.

User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 31085
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: Official 2010 NFL Draft Thread

Post by Popeye_Card »

If Cleveland really did offer "most of their picks" to trade up to the #1 spot as was rumored, IMO the Rams whiffed BIG time. With that, the Rams probably could have come away with a good OT, Claussen or McCoy, and two good receivers just in the first two rounds, vs. ending up with Bradford and one good receiver. Considering the holes on the Rams roster, that is a real head shaker.

Post Reply