UPDATE: Cards Acquire Holliday, page 26
- Swingingbunt
- All-Star
- Posts: 2904
- Joined: April 4 08, 9:49 am
- Location: Indianapolis
Re: UPDATE: Cards Close to Acquiring Holliday, page 18
I really hope you guys are right about Mortenson. I'm not one of the loons who'll cry myself to sleep if he turns out, but this still seems like a very steep price unless we are extending him.
-
AWvsCBsteeeerike3
- "I could totally eat a pig butt, if smoked correctly!"
- Posts: 27567
- Joined: August 5 08, 11:24 am
- Location: Thinking of the Children
Re: UPDATE: Cards Close to Acquiring Holliday, page 18
That sums up my thoughts exactly. Plus...I know this won't be a popular opinion, but the lineup needs way, way way more help than the rotation....skmsw wrote:Mortenson and Peterson are bodies. I have no problem tossing them into a deal for any impact player.
In a way, I am happier trading Wallace for Holliday than I would be for Halladay . . . not entirely happier, but in a way. A 29-year old everyday player, impact bat, good on bases, with bat, and in field, a guy you can re-sign to be part of your core for five years or more (or else get two premium draft picks) . . . verses a soon-to-be 33 year old pitcher who is probably the best in baseball right now but is a pitcher not an everyday player, and is 32 not 29, and is a much more dubious re-sign when his contract is up.
- Ace
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: April 18 06, 9:36 pm
- Location: St. Louis
Re: Matt Holliday & Willingham Thread (new: Holliday rumor 7/23)
Mortensen has never been projected as more than a back of the rotation guy even when he was drafted. He has been old at every level he has pitched, and has a 1.39 WHIP in the minor leagues and hasn't made a whole lot of progress. I personally consider him organizational filler.cards2468 wrote:Unlike Thompson, he actually has some nasty stuff, he potentially can be a #3 starter.AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:Mortenson will never be a #3 pitcher. He is Thompson Jr.cards2468 wrote:I'm not a fan either. Walrus for Holliday+cash is still a tad excessive... throwing in a MLB ready SP that could be a #3 starter within a few years is definitely over-doing itSwingingbunt wrote:I know Morty is no Haren...but I don't like giving pitchers to Oakland. It makes my skin crawl.
- Swingingbunt
- All-Star
- Posts: 2904
- Joined: April 4 08, 9:49 am
- Location: Indianapolis
Re: UPDATE: Cards Close to Acquiring Holliday, page 18
Yes. A 2-5 of Rasmus, Pujols, Holliday, and Ludwick is very solid. IMO, Ludwick will really thrive without the pressure of being "The Protector" for Pujols.AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:the lineup needs way, way way more help than the rotation....
Last edited by Swingingbunt on July 24 09, 9:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
- JL21
- NPR & THT Contributor
- Posts: 36109
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
- Location: Chocolate City
Re: UPDATE: Cards Close to Acquiring Holliday, page 18
That's the other scary thing... what if his asking price is huge, nobody signs him, and the Cardinals have to take him to an arbitration judge? His price will be unwieldy and you don't get draft picks.Michael wrote:I'm not doing backflips over this one.
It's worth noting we'll get draft picks if he declines arbitration in the off-season.
EDIT: However, y'all are right about the Mortensen thing. I'm coming down off of that a little bit. I still think it was unnecessary to include him. You're already giving them six cost-controlled years of Brett Wallace for two months of a "superstar" with warts
- cards2468
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 14745
- Joined: October 28 06, 11:10 pm
- Location: LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT
Re: UPDATE: Cards Close to Acquiring Holliday, page 18
I'm in favor of bringing in Holliday, but I still think Willingham could have been had for cheaper, plus he's financially cheaper and is having a better year than Holliday.
- Centreville
- Sunshine, lollipops and rainbows
- Posts: 1449
- Joined: February 25 07, 7:26 pm
- Location: VA
Re: UPDATE: Cards Close to Acquiring Holliday, page 18
surely you jest. i hope..Holliday may be our best chance at a playoff run and World Series this year
- Radbird
- There's someone in my head but it's not me
- Posts: 62389
- Joined: April 18 06, 5:08 pm
- Location: LF Bleachers @ Busch II
Re: UPDATE: Cards Close to Acquiring Holliday, page 18
Jon Heyman from SI weighs in.
Holliday talks progressing between A's, Cardinals
Holliday talks progressing between A's, Cardinals
One baseball official, speaking of the potential trade, said, "It's getting closer.'' However, there's no sign it's been finalized as of yet.
The Tigers are another serious pursuer of Holliday. The Giants are believed to have some interest.
The A's have been targeting top Cardinals hitting prospect Brett Wallace. The Cardinals may want the A's to pay the $1.8 million bonus Wallace received in 2008 in any deal involving him.
The Cardinals will try to sign Holliday to a contract extension if they can complete the trade.
- cards2468
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 14745
- Joined: October 28 06, 11:10 pm
- Location: LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT
Re: UPDATE: Cards Close to Acquiring Holliday, page 18
If he accepts arbitration, we'll get him for a year at probably $16 mil, which isn't the end of the world.JL21 wrote:That's the other scary thing... what if his asking price is huge, nobody signs him, and the Cardinals have to take him to an arbitration judge? His price will be unwieldy and you don't get draft picks.Michael wrote:I'm not doing backflips over this one.
It's worth noting we'll get draft picks if he declines arbitration in the off-season.
-
Michael
- GRB Founder
- Posts: 35303
- Joined: December 31 69, 6:00 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: UPDATE: Cards Close to Acquiring Holliday, page 18
JL21 wrote:That's the other scary thing... what if his asking price is huge, nobody signs him, and the Cardinals have to take him to an arbitration judge? His price will be unwieldy and you don't get draft picks.Michael wrote:I'm not doing backflips over this one.
It's worth noting we'll get draft picks if he declines arbitration in the off-season.
On the other hand, you have an excellent player with the low risk one year contact before an AP extension. My guess he'll get around 16-18m? Not ideal, but it could be worse.
I'm warming up to this too. If nothing else, it's exciting.



