The staginess of the nature in The Night of the Hunter is one of its best aspects to me, it gives it that surreal, freaky edge. Same with the bizarre architecture of the house they live in. That movie is amazing and I'm still waiting on a DVD with the proper aspect ratio (1.66:1). It was supposed to be released late last year and randomly got upheld for unknown reasons.
It's a shame Charles Laughton never did another film.
Freed Roger wrote:I recently watched "Night of the Hunter" . Really a good movie. Mitchum is, dare I say, "freakin awesome". One of the best performances of a villian/badmen of any era. the kids were central to the plot and they were pretty good, only one part or two where they looked too phony.
My one criticism of the movie, the technical elements seemed a bit dated. Movie was 1955 - so they frequently seem to switch from realistic/natural settings to the more stagey type settings.
Night of the Hunter is one of the greatest films of all time and the absolute best film by a director (Charles Laughton) who only directed one movie.
Watch it again sometime, Roger. For whatever reason, the first time I watched it I couldn't quite enjoy it as much as I do now. I think I was uncomfortable because it's a pretty intense story. In subsequent viewing I was more relaxed and have grown to just love everything about it. The scenes that you mention as a complaint are actually some of my favorite because their surreal feel just adds to this completely surreal film.
The Third Man wrote:The staginess of the nature in The Night of the Hunter is one of its best aspects to me, it gives it that surreal, freaky edge. Same with the bizarre architecture of the house they live in. That movie is amazing and I'm still waiting on a DVD with the proper aspect ratio (1.66:1). It was supposed to be released late last year and randomly got upheld for unknown reasons.
It's a shame Charles Laughton never did another film.
You posted the perfect picture to exemplify what I meant - that looks somewhat like a set you'd see for a play. You're right, after mulling it over, I now realize this was purposely done for effect -switching from realism to surrealism - and I was a little too dense to pick up on that. In modern era, they'd seque to a blood and gore scene to get you off kilter, in the old days they used artistic touches.
also -now that you mention it -that house was pretty funky. the loft/bedroom was a classic setting. And what a sense of doom you felt when Mitchum is going back in that house after doing away with the mom.
Richie, I'm a fan of this movie, in spite of my small critique. An under-rated classic.
Freed Roger wrote:Richie, I'm a fan of this movie, in spite of my small critique. An under-rated classic.
I could tell you were. I was simply suggesting another viewing at some point to see if it elevates to one of your all time favorites, like it did the second time I watched it.