Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product? (NSFW)
- Hungary Jack
- Mother Earth
- Posts: 19536
- Joined: July 24 06, 6:03 am
- Location: In Cognito
Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product?
I have no problem with this ad.
-
Magneto2.0
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 18100
- Joined: June 16 07, 2:12 pm
Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product?
I'm missing the ugly part of this photo.
- Radbird
- There's someone in my head but it's not me
- Posts: 62390
- Joined: April 18 06, 5:08 pm
- Location: LF Bleachers @ Busch II
Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product?
Exactly.Jocephus wrote:boing
- stlouie_lipp
- Hallelujah Brother
- Posts: 13380
- Joined: April 17 06, 7:36 pm
Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product?
I agree.cardsfansince82 wrote:I think it's just an ugly product. She should take it off immediately.
- thrill
- bronoun enthusiast
- Posts: 30539
- Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
- Location: barely online
Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product? (NSFW)
That chick is hot, but I gotta go ugly product. What is with the midriff cover? That looks weird and hard to take off.
Notice on this one how the panties and bra are separate pieces. It allows you to appreciate the midriff and also with them not being connected, it is much easier to remove them.

Yes, yes, I'd definitely go with something more like this, though I wouldn't necessarily be disappointed with the original photo.
Notice on this one how the panties and bra are separate pieces. It allows you to appreciate the midriff and also with them not being connected, it is much easier to remove them.

Yes, yes, I'd definitely go with something more like this, though I wouldn't necessarily be disappointed with the original photo.
- sighyoung
- Mayor of GRB
- Posts: 38643
- Joined: April 17 06, 7:42 pm
- Location: Louisville
Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product? (NSFW)
I have to disagree. A clear cellophane bra and panties with a red pull cord for easy opening would be preferable.thrill wrote:That chick is hot, but I gotta go ugly product. What is with the midriff cover? That looks weird and hard to take off.
Notice on this one how the panties and bra are separate pieces. It allows you to appreciate the midriff and also with them not being connected, it is much easier to remove them.
Yes, yes, I'd definitely go with something more like this, though I wouldn't necessarily be disappointed with the original photo.
- ghostrunner
- GOAT
- Posts: 30870
- Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm
Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product?
I think I'm a weird guy, but stuff like this does nothing for me. I'd rather see a plain old cotton bra and panties. That or something kinkier. Too cutesy.docellis wrote:
this is the cutest thing they have for sale right now and they didn't even bother putting a model in it.
they are slacking.
The first item - is there some practical reason for having it all one piece? So you don't have lines under a dress?
- sighyoung
- Mayor of GRB
- Posts: 38643
- Joined: April 17 06, 7:42 pm
- Location: Louisville
Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product? (NSFW)
That does have a "tired and trapped in a bad relationship, but given this Victoria's Secret underwear to please my Neanderthal boyfriend" look.docellis wrote:This girl is beautiful in most photos. Why did they do this? I will not buy this product. Maybe the product is the ugly thing. Maybe this is the best the photographer could do with this product.
Maybe something like this would have been better (except open, to show the lingerie):

- InvincibleCakeEater
- GRB's obsessive compulsive baseball poster
- Posts: 28275
- Joined: October 12 07, 12:28 pm
- Location: Raptured
Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product? (NSFW)
I do not understand her appeal. She's good looking and all, but there are way hotter actresses.sighyoung wrote:
- sighyoung
- Mayor of GRB
- Posts: 38643
- Joined: April 17 06, 7:42 pm
- Location: Louisville
Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product? (NSFW)
Oh, I'm not pushing Jennifer Biel, but a new aesthetic in underwear modeling.






