robbotis wrote:
No one has the answer. Some people are inherently bad and some are inherently lazy. Just like some are innately great speakers and others are heroic.
Everyone won't ever be equal or have all the same things. It won't happen. It's the flaw of Marxism/Socialism; people aren't perfect though an ideology could be.
Where does the canard of equal results come from?
And the flaw of other isms has been the frequent temptation to conclude that we have already ferreted out the people who are "inherently bad" and "inherently lazy" by perceiving one or two characteristics. After all, if one person begins on the starting line, and one twenty meters ahead, is it still a fair race? Should we also conclude innate inferiority from this?
No wonder people have felt that they can skip a few steps, and simply legislate that the "inherently bad" or "inherently lazy" cannot vote, cannot interbreed with the "inherently superior," cannot work in fields reserved for the "inherently superior", must receive a third-rate or fourth rate education--and if one is offed by extrajudicial measures, well, what's the harm?
