Rant, Stl Metro

The forum for ranting, raving, complaining and praising
User avatar
JCShutout
MacGyver of Underwear
Posts: 13368
Joined: April 18 06, 7:53 am
Location: South City

Re: Rant, Stl Metro

Post by JCShutout »

MrCrowesGarden wrote:When my family lived in St. Charles, we voted FOR the Metro to extend out there (well, my mom and dad did, I wasn't old enough).

We weren't really pressed for time ever, so the Metro was convenient. I know my dad loved being able to drive to Hanley, take a leisurely ride, and then walk the couple blocks to his workplace.
Part of what I loved about DC. Going anywhere involved reading a book, then walking a few blocks instead of driving. No looking for a parking spot or sitting in traffic or trying to drive while having a phone conversation.

I think comprehensive bus lines compliment subway/rail. I'd use both.

Thing about DC was the subways (etc) had more fake cop partol. You actually felt safe, "even stumbling home drunk at 3am" as one of my female friends living in DC said. They also enforced the "no food or drink" policy, so the trains were very clean.

User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: Rant, Stl Metro

Post by JL21 »

cardinalkarp wrote:
No offense to those of you that have griped, but this would be akin to going Xmas shopping on Christmas Eve at 11:55 pm and complaining that they don't have any of the stuff that you wanted to buy.
This was worse than cramped, it was illegal I'm sure for the metro to allow that many people on a train car. If someone would've fell (which was quite possible w/ the amount of people that KEPT piling on at each stop) they would've been trampled and not been able to get back up.

It completely ruined Mardi Gras that year. We didn't even get downtown, we had to force our way out of the train at some random stop and catch a cab home (which was about $40).

edit : I've ridden it after Rams and Cards games and this was NO comparison. I actually felt unsafe w/ the amount of people they were allowing to get on.
Ok... but you're still judging it/avoiding it because of one instance when you could take it any other time, 364 days a year for 18 hours a day... and not have the same problem.

User avatar
JCShutout
MacGyver of Underwear
Posts: 13368
Joined: April 18 06, 7:53 am
Location: South City

Re: Rant, Stl Metro

Post by JCShutout »

JL21 wrote:Ok... but you're still judging it/avoiding it because of one instance when you could take it any other time, 364 days a year for 18 hours a day... and not have the same problem.
++ Also, if more trains were running (in the heavy areas of DC they doubled up lines so the trains would not be as crowded), less people would crowd on the metro on peak hours/days.

Image

See how the blue and orange, as well as the yellow and green, and the blue and yellow double up in certain areas? That way you can get on any line running through the station to get to your destination, and the trains don't get too crowded.

User avatar
cardinalkarp
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 18744
Joined: May 4 06, 8:44 am

Re: Rant, Stl Metro

Post by cardinalkarp »

Ok... but you're still judging it/avoiding it because of one instance when you could take it any other time, 364 days a year for 18 hours a day... and not have the same problem.
None of the pick up spots are all that convienent for me so I just choose not to use it.

User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: Rant, Stl Metro

Post by JL21 »

cardinalkarp wrote:None of the pick up spots are all that convienent for me so I just choose not to use it.
Understandable. That's where I'm coming from right now. My options are to either:

1) Drive 5 to 10 minutes to the Metro stop, and then take it for another 15 minutes to work

2) Drive 10 to 15 minutes work

If it made sense for me, right now, I'd be all over it. But in that scenario, it really doesn't make sense.

User avatar
lukethedrifter
darjeeling sipping elite
Posts: 37260
Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
Location: Huis Clos

Re: Rant, Stl Metro

Post by lukethedrifter »

JL21 wrote:
cardinalkarp wrote:None of the pick up spots are all that convienent for me so I just choose not to use it.
Understandable. That's where I'm coming from right now. My options are to either:

1) Drive 5 to 10 minutes to the Metro stop, and then take it for another 15 minutes to work

2) Drive 10 to 15 minutes work

If it made sense for me, right now, I'd be all over it. But in that scenario, it really doesn't make sense.
I bet you'd take the Metro Link if they had garlic cream cheese.

User avatar
cardinalkarp
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 18744
Joined: May 4 06, 8:44 am

Re: Rant, Stl Metro

Post by cardinalkarp »

JL21 wrote:
cardinalkarp wrote:None of the pick up spots are all that convienent for me so I just choose not to use it.
Understandable. That's where I'm coming from right now. My options are to either:

1) Drive 5 to 10 minutes to the Metro stop, and then take it for another 15 minutes to work

2) Drive 10 to 15 minutes work

If it made sense for me, right now, I'd be all over it. But in that scenario, it really doesn't make sense.
Mine is more like a 30 min drive (minimum) to a metro stop. At that point if I'm already driving that far I'm going the whole way w/ it.

Post Reply