JL21 wrote:Ok, ok, ok..... see, when have you ever known me to watch a movie without being stupidly critical about it? I'd hate to lump this thing together with 300. I thought 300 was awful. As entertainment, it was fine- look at all the pretty special effects!- but as a film, it was crap.clement wrote:Well, I just don't think it was *that* good. To be honest, I was really enthralled but it lost me a bit toward the end. I don't they handled the transformation of two-face all that well and the final showdown was a mess. So... good, not great. The rant is because of all the over-hyping of it and the lack of any critical judgment of the movie at all on this board. I mean, this was also the board that went haywire for '300' when it first came out. And this is a rant.TimeForGuinness wrote:In the words of the Joker, "Why...So...Serious" Clement?
But I agree with you guys... a good movie if it's really a good movie, it shouldn't matter what genre it comes from. And I actually agree that this movie is better than Star Wars (but I never thought Star Wars was a great movie to begin with).
Part of me is disappointed because I think this could have been a movie that transcends its genre, but I think ultimately it fell a little bit short of that.
Please read this spoiler, if you've seen the movie.
Dark Knight
-
TimeForGuinness
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 20007
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm
Re: Dark Knight
- JL21
- NPR & THT Contributor
- Posts: 36109
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
- Location: Chocolate City
Re: Dark Knight
Another spoiler...
-
TimeForGuinness
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 20007
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm
- clevername
- Bringer of FRBG
- Posts: 10380
- Joined: April 16 06, 7:13 pm
- Location: Alabama
Re: Dark Knight
I often find it much easier and enjoyable to go to the movies alone. There's no jumbling of schedules or showtimes, no [expletive] about getting there earlier for appropriate seats (I'm particular about that), and I don't want to talk to anyone during the movie anyway. Social norms and perceptions be damned.
- Transmogrified Tiger
- Puppy Murderer
- Posts: 9323
- Joined: April 25 06, 6:07 pm
- Location: Across the River
Re: Dark Knight
Let's make things clear for a second. 300 was total garbage. The Dark Knight was awesome. Maybe if you wait for the DVD you can put on the french subtitles or something and like it more.
But seriously, when's the last time this many good actors were all in a film and put together good to phenomenal performances? Ledger, Eckhart, Bale, Caine, Freeman, Oldman, Gyllenhaal, even Fichtner and Roberts were appropriate in their shady roles.
But seriously, when's the last time this many good actors were all in a film and put together good to phenomenal performances? Ledger, Eckhart, Bale, Caine, Freeman, Oldman, Gyllenhaal, even Fichtner and Roberts were appropriate in their shady roles.
- clement
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 6008
- Joined: April 20 06, 10:26 pm
Re: Dark Knight
Man, I absolutely love watching movies alone. I like watching them with friends too, but sometimes alone is just perfect.
JL: yeah, I think there were a lot of really great scenes in Dark Knight, the one you mentioned being one of them. If you really think the movie is only about a 7.5 out of 10, then we're probably pretty much in agreement. Not to be lost in this rant is the fact that I really enjoyed Dark Knight. And I admittedly don't get excited by action blockbuster type movies. So yeah, Dark Knight is far more memorable than Transformers, and even the Spiderman movies, but it's not more memorable than Chinatown, or even a number of new movies I've seen this year. The distance (for me) between Dark Knight and something like No Country for Old Men or Garage, is very wide.
TG: yeah movie junkie is a pretty accurate description. But I like slow, cerebral movies where there is not a lot of action. Hollywood movies rarely interest me much.
JL: yeah, I think there were a lot of really great scenes in Dark Knight, the one you mentioned being one of them. If you really think the movie is only about a 7.5 out of 10, then we're probably pretty much in agreement. Not to be lost in this rant is the fact that I really enjoyed Dark Knight. And I admittedly don't get excited by action blockbuster type movies. So yeah, Dark Knight is far more memorable than Transformers, and even the Spiderman movies, but it's not more memorable than Chinatown, or even a number of new movies I've seen this year. The distance (for me) between Dark Knight and something like No Country for Old Men or Garage, is very wide.
TG: yeah movie junkie is a pretty accurate description. But I like slow, cerebral movies where there is not a lot of action. Hollywood movies rarely interest me much.
- JL21
- NPR & THT Contributor
- Posts: 36109
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
- Location: Chocolate City
Re: Dark Knight
We have pretty similar tastes. I'm trying to think of what's come out in the last 12 months that I enjoyed more. There Will be Blood, No Country for Old Men, and I'm Not There.... but that's it.
I have a hard time comparing across genres, though. That's just me.
I have a hard time comparing across genres, though. That's just me.
-
maddash
- is eerily well-versed on Project Runway and irony
- Posts: 8508
- Joined: June 26 06, 3:07 pm
Re: Dark Knight
The temptation to masturbate is simply too great for some.thrill wrote:Why on earth can't people just go see a movie alone?
- Popeye_Card
- GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
- Posts: 31085
- Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am
Re: Dark Knight
The popcorn trick is always fun. Even when you have to pull it on yourself.maddash wrote:The temptation to masturbate is simply too great for some.thrill wrote:Why on earth can't people just go see a movie alone?
- Cronos
- In perpetuum
- Posts: 34778
- Joined: June 30 06, 7:49 am
- Location: St. Louis
Re: Dark Knight
Popeye_Card wrote:The popcorn trick is always fun. Even when you have to pull it on yourself.maddash wrote:The temptation to masturbate is simply too great for some.thrill wrote:Why on earth can't people just go see a movie alone?



