St. Louis would have seen some of the work...and the 767 line will be shut down most likely.Popeye_Card wrote:I'm just going by what little bit I've heard on the radio. I'll admit to not paying very good attention to it.G. Keenan wrote:Would it? I thought it would primarily have benefited Washington State and Kansas. In any event, it isn't hurting the factory in Washington that builds 767s because they have a big backlog of commercial orders for the 767.Popeye_Card wrote:Since it would have brought a decent amount of money and jobs to the St. Louis area, it would have been nice if Boeing got the contract. But that's me being selfish for St. Louis.Hungary Jack wrote:In this age of global capitalism where a company domiciled in one nation is like owned by individual and institutional investors from everywhere else, the nationality of the company winning the contract matters a lot less to me than the quality of the product and where the work is done.
And Airbus is building a new factory in Alabama to build these tankers and future commercial A330s. I'm sure Alabama can dearly use such job creation.
The US Air Force
-
TimeForGuinness
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 20007
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm
Re: The US Air Force
- G. Keenan
- Sucking on the Rally Nipple
- Posts: 23718
- Joined: April 16 06, 6:03 pm
- Location: Chicago
Re: The US Air Force
Not until at least 2012 which is how long it will take to get through it's current backlog of 767 orders.TimeForGuinness wrote:St. Louis would have seen some of the work...and the 767 line will be shut down most likely.Popeye_Card wrote:I'm just going by what little bit I've heard on the radio. I'll admit to not paying very good attention to it.G. Keenan wrote:Would it? I thought it would primarily have benefited Washington State and Kansas. In any event, it isn't hurting the factory in Washington that builds 767s because they have a big backlog of commercial orders for the 767.Popeye_Card wrote:Since it would have brought a decent amount of money and jobs to the St. Louis area, it would have been nice if Boeing got the contract. But that's me being selfish for St. Louis.Hungary Jack wrote:In this age of global capitalism where a company domiciled in one nation is like owned by individual and institutional investors from everywhere else, the nationality of the company winning the contract matters a lot less to me than the quality of the product and where the work is done.
And Airbus is building a new factory in Alabama to build these tankers and future commercial A330s. I'm sure Alabama can dearly use such job creation.
-
TimeForGuinness
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 20007
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm
Re: The US Air Force
2012 isn't a long way away...career-wise. Granted many will be shifted to the 787 line...but this contract probably would have kept that line open for another 20 years.G. Keenan wrote:Not until at least 2012 which is how long it will take to get through it's current backlog of 767 orders.TimeForGuinness wrote:St. Louis would have seen some of the work...and the 767 line will be shut down most likely.Popeye_Card wrote:I'm just going by what little bit I've heard on the radio. I'll admit to not paying very good attention to it.G. Keenan wrote:Would it? I thought it would primarily have benefited Washington State and Kansas. In any event, it isn't hurting the factory in Washington that builds 767s because they have a big backlog of commercial orders for the 767.Popeye_Card wrote:Since it would have brought a decent amount of money and jobs to the St. Louis area, it would have been nice if Boeing got the contract. But that's me being selfish for St. Louis.Hungary Jack wrote:In this age of global capitalism where a company domiciled in one nation is like owned by individual and institutional investors from everywhere else, the nationality of the company winning the contract matters a lot less to me than the quality of the product and where the work is done.
And Airbus is building a new factory in Alabama to build these tankers and future commercial A330s. I'm sure Alabama can dearly use such job creation.
- New Pagodi
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 4219
- Joined: April 18 06, 11:30 pm
- Location: St. Louis
- Contact:
Re: The US Air Force
It looks like they're going to redo the bidding process.
- Leroy
- a bad penny always turns up
- Posts: 25228
- Joined: April 17 06, 12:27 pm
- Location: Hanging out with my redneck, white socks and Blue Ribbon beer.
- Contact:
Re: The US Air Force
Are any of you in the Air Force?
- sighyoung
- Mayor of GRB
- Posts: 38643
- Joined: April 17 06, 7:42 pm
- Location: Louisville
Re: The US Air Force
I'm not in the Air Force, but I can force air.
- jimedmondsfan
- Veteran Player
- Posts: 782
- Joined: August 24 06, 11:38 am
- Location: Out of my mind
- Contact:
Re: The US Air Force
Frankly, I am more upset about the Chrysler Building being 75% owned by Saudi Arabia.....
- sighyoung
- Mayor of GRB
- Posts: 38643
- Joined: April 17 06, 7:42 pm
- Location: Louisville
Re: The US Air Force
I don't know. Japanese investors lost their shirts buying Rockefeller Center several years ago.jimedmondsfan wrote:Frankly, I am more upset about the Chrysler Building being 75% owned by Saudi Arabia.....



