collective board rant: IZZY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The forum for ranting, raving, complaining and praising
User avatar
clevername
Bringer of FRBG
Posts: 10380
Joined: April 16 06, 7:13 pm
Location: Alabama

collective board rant: IZZY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by clevername »

:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:

maddash
is eerily well-versed on Project Runway and irony
Posts: 8508
Joined: June 26 06, 3:07 pm

Re: collective board rant: IZZY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by maddash »

It's easy to blame Izzy, and that cutter to Soriano was about as fat and juicy as I've ever seen, but...

Fan Graphs (at press time) show only 2 out of 11 Cardinals hitters with a WPA that isn't in the negative numbers. Our offense let us down in a major way tonight considering we got to the Cubs' pen in the 1st.

User avatar
ThatGuy
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 5114
Joined: October 15 06, 4:40 pm
Location: Knoxville, TN

Re: collective board rant: IZZY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by ThatGuy »

Yeah. At this point, you've just gotta expect some kind of frustrating/stressful ending. He's good when he's good, but most of the time he makes it WAY too interesting.

I can remember when he surrendered a grand slam to the Expos in the 12th inning in 2004, so at some point you just get used to it.

User avatar
clevername
Bringer of FRBG
Posts: 10380
Joined: April 16 06, 7:13 pm
Location: Alabama

Re: collective board rant: IZZY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by clevername »

it should be noted that this rant isn't only for tonight.

Izzy's last 5 appearances have netted 2 blown saves and 2 losses along with 2 saves.

planet planet
http://tinyurl.com/2e4x5hy
Posts: 24904
Joined: April 15 06, 6:25 pm
Location: St. Louis

Re: collective board rant: IZZY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by planet planet »

Yes, for once this isn't a misguided rant! He has shown nothing, stuff wise and he's sporting a 7.11 ERA. We're in worse shape, performance wise than any closer in the MLB.

jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: collective board rant: IZZY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by jim »

Yeah but he's been successful more often then he hasn't. Can't say that about Pujols.

User avatar
haltz
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 22630
Joined: November 9 06, 6:45 am
Location: a proud midwestern metropolis

Re: collective board rant: IZZY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by haltz »

jim wrote:Yeah but he's been successful more often then he hasn't. Can't say that about Pujols.
This is pretty funny.

However, Pujols is channeling Bonds right now so it's not actually true.

jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: collective board rant: IZZY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by jim »

haltz wrote:
jim wrote:Yeah but he's been successful more often then he hasn't. Can't say that about Pujols.
This is pretty funny.

However, Pujols is channeling Bonds right now so it's not actually true.
I wondered if/how long it would take for someone to point out that little flaw in my logic. Yes, and 5 minutes were the answers.

I keep forgetting the sophisticated crowd I am dealing with.

User avatar
Hungary Jack
Mother Earth
Posts: 19536
Joined: July 24 06, 6:03 am
Location: In Cognito

Re: collective board rant: IZZY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by Hungary Jack »

haltz wrote:
jim wrote:Yeah but he's been successful more often then he hasn't. Can't say that about Pujols.
This is pretty funny.
I think he's saying that Izzy has converted a higher percentage of save opportunities than AP has gotten hits or walks in his PA's.

But it's hard to argue who the more successful player is. Hint: he doesn't pitch.

User avatar
haltz
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 22630
Joined: November 9 06, 6:45 am
Location: a proud midwestern metropolis

Re: collective board rant: IZZY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post by haltz »

I wondered if/how long it would take for someone to point out that little flaw in my logic. Yes, and 5 minutes were the answers.

I keep forgetting the sophisticated crowd I am dealing with.
LOL - I guess I feel the need to point out a .526 OBP even if it means telling someone something they already know.

Post Reply