Soderberg out at SLU
- JL21
- NPR & THT Contributor
- Posts: 36109
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
- Location: Chocolate City
- robbotis
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 4791
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:05 am
- Location: Minneapolis
Agreed. Good thing Bob Huggins has all ready switched his job for the year.RC21 wrote:Dumb.
1. He ran a clean program.
2. His players graduate.
3. His teams aren't terrible. They're at least competitive and play in the post-season, even if it is only the NIT.
4. Which high profile coach will you find to do all those things, and be willing to do it at SLU?
Dumb.
- longhornbaseball
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 5527
- Joined: April 18 06, 10:37 pm
- Transmogrified Tiger
- Puppy Murderer
- Posts: 9323
- Joined: April 25 06, 6:07 pm
- Location: Across the River
I don't think there's anybody that can get Suggs and Griffey to go to SLU.longhornbaseball wrote:We should offer Lowery 30 billion dollars.
Seriously, Soderberg's a good man but he blew it this year. A strong core with Lisch, Liddell, and Voyoukas but no depth behind them. It was time for a change. Hopefully we'll get someone to lure Suggs and Griffey here.
I think the "clean program, graduates people, makes the NIT" deal is selling the program short. There are a lot of good coaches that have the potential to do more.
- longhornbaseball
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 5527
- Joined: April 18 06, 10:37 pm
- Popeye_Card
- GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
- Posts: 31013
- Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am
It's a smallish Catholic school playing in a rather weak conference. You might get lucky finding a great, unknown coach. But I don't think any big names are beating down the doors to get an interview.Transmogrified Tiger wrote:
I think the "clean program, graduates people, makes the NIT" deal is selling the program short. There are a lot of good coaches that have the potential to do more.
I know people want SLU basketball to be better, but I don't know if they should *expect* it. Honestly, running a clean program that graduates players should be priority #1 for SLU, an institution that focuses more on academics than athletics as a whole. Very few schools excel at both.
--P--
- StL Dan
- banned
- Posts: 8159
- Joined: June 14 06, 9:40 pm
- Location: St. Louis in spirit
I agree. Going from the C-USA to the A10 was probably a step down in some regard.Popeye_Card wrote:It's a smallish Catholic school playing in a rather weak conference. You might get lucky finding a great, unknown coach. But I don't think any big names are beating down the doors to get an interview.Transmogrified Tiger wrote:
I think the "clean program, graduates people, makes the NIT" deal is selling the program short. There are a lot of good coaches that have the potential to do more.
I know people want SLU basketball to be better, but I don't know if they should *expect* it. Honestly, running a clean program that graduates players should be priority #1 for SLU, an institution that focuses more on academics than athletics as a whole. Very few schools excel at both.
--P--
Word I'm hearing from local media is saying Soderburg didn't recruit StL kids. Is that true?
If so, who will they hire that will? And, is that the magic bullet to building a top 25 program?
Heck, imo, I'd rather see SLU win another NCAA men's soccer championship than anything.
-
TimeForGuinness
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 20007
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm
- GatewaySnayke
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 11923
- Joined: July 23 06, 11:54 pm
- Location: GatewaySnaykebird





