Count me a mong those who did not find the usually-vapid Jackson's article all that egregious. A couple quick thoughts about some of the posts on this thread:
the Cardinals pitching staff right now is basically Chris Carpenter, Josh Hancock and 10 question marks
Not for nothing, but it would even be fair to think of Hancock as a questionmark. He's 29 and has the equivalent of a season and a half in the majors. He puts a ton of balls in play so there is the possibility of some big time regression (especially if lack of depth in the pen means TLR getting to pick and choose a little less than he likes), and he does not get the ball past many hitters. What he is going to do this year is a pretty open question, frankly.
I heard his velocity was coming back up. He was hitting 91 in his last start. That's where he sat last year.
He was
hitting (not sitting) 91 this week. And yes, that IS like last year, when he worked 88-91 -- and when he gave up rather a lot of homers, had an ERA of 5, pitched well enough to earn an ERA of more like 5 and a half (see: FIP), and admitted he couldn't throw as hard as he used to and didn't know why. So, being where he left off last season is no particular accomplishment so far, in my eyes.
Til he is sitting 92-94, and hitting 95+ at least a couple-few pitches per start, he still is not the same as he was exiting 2005, regardless of whether due to pitch selection, mechanics, injury, fatigue, or the lunar cycles. Mind you, I'm NOT saying he can't be a good pitcher exactly the way he is. But even if only in my eyes, the mystery of where his explosive stuff and late movement and above-average velocity all went is very much still out there.