How long would you give Walker as a starter?

Discuss all things Cardinals Baseball
Post Reply

How long would you give Walker this season?

Poll ended at March 29 26, 9:48 am

Send him to AAA again/bench him
6
27%
DFA/Waive him now
2
9%
2 months
3
14%
All Star Break
2
9%
the whole season
2
9%
Depends on what Baez or others are doing in AAA
7
32%
 
Total votes: 22

User avatar
ghostrunner
GOAT
Posts: 30391
Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm

How long would you give Walker as a starter?

Post by ghostrunner »

I think my standard to stick around as a starter would be at least a .750 OPS but others may differ. Whatever you want to see out of him, how long would you give Walker to meet it before you say it's time to take him out of the starting lineup?

User avatar
AdmiralKird
MBA, CPA, CFA, CFP, JD, PE, MD
Posts: 10162
Joined: March 7 07, 4:50 pm
Location: Tycho Crater, Luna

Re: How long would you give Walker as a starter?

Post by AdmiralKird »

Given that this is basically a AAAA team, might as well just use him all year unless he falls apart and/or mentally needs a change of scenery.

User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 30864
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: How long would you give Walker as a starter?

Post by Popeye_Card »

I think it all depends on *how* he is struggling, and if we have any better options.

I don't think we'll have all that better of options, and this is going to be a lost season anyway. I think you keep running him out there to figure it out, unless you think that harming his confidence is going to ruin whatever shred of bust-out potential he may have.

He has close to zero value remaining as a tradable asset. Might as well play him.

User avatar
sighyoung
Mayor of GRB
Posts: 38538
Joined: April 17 06, 7:42 pm
Location: Louisville

Re: How long would you give Walker as a starter?

Post by sighyoung »

Popeye_Card makes a good point about the kind of struggles that we might see from Walker. If he's a slightly-below-league-average player, yeah, they'll run him out until a better option presents itself. If he collapses, I think he'll be in the minors again for an extended stretch.

Clearly, the team wants him to develop and has to think about the best means to that development. It may be in the majors, but he may benefit from extended time in AAA. His performance will decide that for them--especially if he craters mentally.

Based on results so far, I wouldn't be surprised to see him in AAA for an extended stretch this year rather than see him play the whole season in the majors. After that, he becomes a change-of-scenery candidate.

User avatar
Fat_Bulldog
likes to grate his own cheese
Posts: 12822
Joined: May 9 06, 12:41 pm
Location: Drunk

Re: How long would you give Walker as a starter?

Post by Fat_Bulldog »

Is this a Cardinal issue? Thinking of all of the outfielders that came up or into the organization with very high upside and potential and none of them lived up to it.

- Walker
- Carlson
- O'Neill
- Nootbaar

I'm sure I'm forgetting others.

User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 30864
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: How long would you give Walker as a starter?

Post by Popeye_Card »

Fat_Bulldog wrote:
March 19 26, 10:54 am
Is this a Cardinal issue? Thinking of all of the outfielders that came up or into the organization with very high upside and potential and none of them lived up to it.

- Walker
- Carlson
- O'Neill
- Nootbaar

I'm sure I'm forgetting others.
I'd probably take O'Neill and Nootbaar off that list. I'd argue that O'Neill actually developed more in some areas than expected (speed, defense), had known flaws his profile (high K rate), but could never stay healthy enough to be a consistently good player. Nootbaar I think was better at the MLB level than most would have expected - he was never a top-100 caliber prospect.

But yeah Walker and Carlson are definite misses, along with Rasmus from years ago. The Cardinals always seem to struggle with developing top-50 type prospects into good/great MLB regulars.

jagtrader
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12121
Joined: June 5 06, 10:01 am

Re: How long would you give Walker as a starter?

Post by jagtrader »

It’s over.

User avatar
GeddyWrox
Caught you a delicious bass
Posts: 14395
Joined: April 20 06, 8:43 pm
Location: Please use blue font for the sarcasm impaired.

Re: How long would you give Walker as a starter?

Post by GeddyWrox »

I'm firmly in the "it depends on what others like Baez" are doing in the minors. If someone else is tearing the cover off the ball, I give Walker until the all-star break. But if the minor leagues don't have an obvious stud ready to bust out, then just let Walker ride this year and see if he can figure something out.

I do tend to agree with jag though. I think it's over.

jagtrader
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 12121
Joined: June 5 06, 10:01 am

Re: How long would you give Walker as a starter?

Post by jagtrader »

Popeye_Card wrote:
March 19 26, 11:44 am
Fat_Bulldog wrote:
March 19 26, 10:54 am
Is this a Cardinal issue? Thinking of all of the outfielders that came up or into the organization with very high upside and potential and none of them lived up to it.

- Walker
- Carlson
- O'Neill
- Nootbaar

I'm sure I'm forgetting others.
I'd probably take O'Neill and Nootbaar off that list. I'd argue that O'Neill actually developed more in some areas than expected (speed, defense), had known flaws his profile (high K rate), but could never stay healthy enough to be a consistently good player. Nootbaar I think was better at the MLB level than most would have expected - he was never a top-100 caliber prospect.

But yeah Walker and Carlson are definite misses, along with Rasmus from years ago. The Cardinals always seem to struggle with developing top-50 type prospects into good/great MLB regulars.
Rasmus was an above-average hitter who produced 20 WAR in 10 seasons. Walker is the worst player in baseball. There are 50-100 minor leaguers who will never get an at-bat in the big leagues who could outproduce Walker this season if given the chance. The only question is how long the Cardinals drag this out. It's painful at this point.

User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 30864
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: How long would you give Walker as a starter?

Post by Popeye_Card »

Walker was also an above-average MLB hitter as a 21 year old rookie, in a reasonable sample size (465 PA's). He's still younger than when the Cardinals gave up on Rasmus and shipped him out.

I don't know what happened. I think he's toast too. But the Cardinals are going to be threatening 100 losses this year already, so we might as well give the only RH OF we have some PA's even if it is painful to watch.

I only bring up Rasmus because he's another example of a top tier prospect that failed to develop in a Cardinal uniform.

Post Reply