movies
Online
- cardinalkarp
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 18743
- Joined: May 4 06, 8:44 am
Re: movies
"Sully" kinda sucked.
- lukethedrifter
- darjeeling sipping elite
- Posts: 37260
- Joined: October 17 06, 11:19 am
- Location: Huis Clos
Re: movies
I haven't seen it yet but one of the complaints I read or heard was that it was Hero Pilot Guy versus Bad Big Government Bureaucrats aka FAA and pretty two dimensional. Still like to check it out.cardinalkarp wrote:"Sully" kinda sucked.
- JoeMcKim
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 9248
- Joined: September 8 09, 10:56 pm
- Location: South County, St. Louis
Re: movies
I wouldn't say that Sully is a bad movie but not really a movie that requires seeing it in the theater. You don't lose that much from the viewing experience watching at home instead of the movie theater.
- ghostrunner
- GOAT
- Posts: 30869
- Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm
Re: movies
I can't for the life of me find a good reason why I'd want to see Sully. Seems like something that 20 years ago would have been a made for TV movie.
- Joe Shlabotnik
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 24290
- Joined: October 12 06, 2:21 pm
- Location: Baseball Ref Bullpen
- Contact:
Re: movies
My wife and I saw this last week via Amazon. I rolled my eyes at that. No way the FAA would have been that confrontational. So I looked it up and, of course, libertarian Eastwood was making his point even though Sullenberger and FAA officials said it wasn't like that. It pissed me off.lukethedrifter wrote:I haven't seen it yet but one of the complaints I read or heard was that it was Hero Pilot Guy versus Bad Big Government Bureaucrats aka FAA and pretty two dimensional. Still like to check it out.cardinalkarp wrote:"Sully" kinda sucked.
But hey - the left has Michael Moore, the right has The Pale Rider.
- Famous Mortimer
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 3961
- Joined: November 14 14, 5:23 am
- Location: Cherokee
Re: movies
As an outsider to the events (I remember the story, but I didn't really know the guy's name until the movie publicity started rolling out) I couldn't agree more.ghostrunner wrote:I can't for the life of me find a good reason why I'd want to see Sully. Seems like something that 20 years ago would have been a made for TV movie.
- haltz
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 22630
- Joined: November 9 06, 6:45 am
- Location: a proud midwestern metropolis
Re: movies
Sully is better than I thought it would be. Basically because like everyone else I find Tom Hanks to be eminently watchable and it held my attention for 2 hours, more than I can say for most movies at this point.
- haltz
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 22630
- Joined: November 9 06, 6:45 am
- Location: a proud midwestern metropolis
Re: movies
My stepdad, a slim commercial airline captain in his sixties with white hair and a mustache, on the other hand, refuses to watch it and despises the name Sully.
- pioneer98
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 22007
- Joined: July 15 08, 8:24 pm
- Location: High A Minors
Re: movies
Throwback: I went back and watched Escape From New York and Escape From L.A. over the holidays. I think I had only seen parts of Escape From New York in the past, and if so, it was a LOOOONG time ago. They both work great as parodies of action movies. They also work as kind of a satire of our country & politics of the last few decades. In that respect they arguably cut pretty close to the bone in some ways. Escape From New York is probably the better movie overall, but I thought Escape From L.A. was funnier and therefore more entertaining. The trailer for Escape From L.A. is just great:
Escape From L.A. is free to stream if you have Amazon Prime.
Escape From L.A. is free to stream if you have Amazon Prime.




