movies

Chat about non-baseball topics. No political discussions!
Post Reply
jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: movies

Post by jim »

go birds wrote:I wonder what the age range is for people who either disliked it or even hated it

Im in my early 30's so i liked it, in part, because of the sense of nostalgia induced
I was basically chasing his ass off of my lawn, and therefore it was not my favorite movie.

Jocephus
99% conan clips
Posts: 64992
Joined: April 18 06, 5:14 pm

Re: movies

Post by Jocephus »

harrison ford returning for blade runner 2

User avatar
ghostrunner
GOAT
Posts: 30870
Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm

Re: movies

Post by ghostrunner »

Jocephus wrote:harrison ford returning for blade runner 2
(And Sigourney Weaver back for the new Alien movie that ignores 3 and 4. Its' the 80's y'all. Crank up that music JL and Saigon hate.)

Wonder how this fits in with the whole "Deckard is a replicant" thing.

Jocephus
99% conan clips
Posts: 64992
Joined: April 18 06, 5:14 pm

Re: movies

Post by Jocephus »

i have to admit *some* interest in a new alien, if it picks up after 2

never was much into blade runner.

but it's still just more regurgitated crap...but at least its crap i would be interested in

User avatar
go birds
-go birds
Posts: 32057
Joined: February 5 10, 9:54 am

Re: movies

Post by go birds »

ghostrunner wrote:
Jocephus wrote:harrison ford returning for blade runner 2
(And Sigourney Weaver back for the new Alien movie that ignores 3 and 4. Its' the 80's y'all. Crank up that music JL and Saigon hate.)

Wonder how this fits in with the whole "Deckard is a replicant" thing.
Also, Neil Blomkamp is directing the new aliens so it should in the least be decent.



I watched Dumb and Dumber To last night and it was.........well terrible. I barely could muster a forced laugh

User avatar
go birds
-go birds
Posts: 32057
Joined: February 5 10, 9:54 am

Re: movies

Post by go birds »

Whiplash owned

User avatar
JoeMcKim
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 9248
Joined: September 8 09, 10:56 pm
Location: South County, St. Louis

Re: movies

Post by JoeMcKim »

Every time I tried to give Blade Runner a chance I never made it through the movie, always so boring.

User avatar
thrill
bronoun enthusiast
Posts: 30539
Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
Location: barely online

Re: movies

Post by thrill »

What We Do In the Shadows was hilarious.

Vidor
You've just been hit by...VidorSmarm™
Posts: 22956
Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm

Re: movies

Post by Vidor »

Recent Films Watched Off Of TCM

* "Oliver!" won the Oscar the year that "2001", "Bullitt", and "Rosemary's Baby" came out. I made it through about 45 minutes before I gave up.

* "From Here to Eternity", on the other hand, was pretty good. I didn't care for the tearjerker ending, but otherwise it holds up well. And both Donna Reed and Deborah Kerr were sexy as hell, which helped.

* "Disraeli" is a pretty good example of how bad early talking films were. The end of silent movies really was a massive step backwards, artistically.

Currently watching "Kings Row", which is one of about three or four films in Ronald Reagan's career that weren't terrible.

User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: movies

Post by JL21 »

thrill wrote:What We Do In the Shadows was hilarious.
I'm kind of annoyed at that movie. I gave money to it on Kickstarter, and I was supposed to get a free digital viewing of it. I assumed that meant I'd get to see it before it hit theaters, but I still haven't gotten it yet.

Post Reply