TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery
- ghostrunner
- GOAT
- Posts: 30868
- Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm
Re: TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery
Twin Peaks is coming back.
- stlouie_lipp
- Hallelujah Brother
- Posts: 13380
- Joined: April 17 06, 7:36 pm
Re: TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery
I was just coming here to post that. Looks like I'll be getting Showtime in 2016.
-
MrSaigon
Re: TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery
AV Club gave Mulaney a B- for the four episodes they saw. Either it gets MUCH better, or this feels like some 'we love his standup' generosity to me, because it's a full two letter grades too high for the pilot, at the very least.
I love his standup myself. But the pilot was terrible, terrible television--even conceding pilot pitfalls. I knew from the previews and Greenwald that it was going to be rough. But it was still worse than I had hoped, and more importantly lacked any threads of hope as far as I could see. Felt way too familiar for anyone that's seen the standup. Also, why were the actors standing so close to each other? I swear there were three different scenes where I thought Mulaney was going to kiss one of his costars.
I love his standup myself. But the pilot was terrible, terrible television--even conceding pilot pitfalls. I knew from the previews and Greenwald that it was going to be rough. But it was still worse than I had hoped, and more importantly lacked any threads of hope as far as I could see. Felt way too familiar for anyone that's seen the standup. Also, why were the actors standing so close to each other? I swear there were three different scenes where I thought Mulaney was going to kiss one of his costars.
-
Vidor
- You've just been hit by...VidorSmarm™
- Posts: 22956
- Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm
Re: TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery
It was OK, but NBC is not doing it any favors by showing the Not Ready For Prime Time Players in the 10 pm slot. Steve Martin doing "King Tut" and Aykroyd & Curtin doiing that Point/Counterpoint about abortion is a pretty dramatic contrast to the modern show.MrCrowesGarden wrote:I thought this weekend's SNL was excellent. Sarah Silverman's monologue was the best I've seen in a long time (and I'm glad to see something other than singing a song). I really like Michael Che on Weekend Update. Jost is better, but still pretty bad.
- MrCrowesGarden
- 'Burb Boy
- Posts: 24841
- Joined: July 9 06, 11:33 am
- Location: Out of the Loop
Re: TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery
I wonder how many younger people stumbled into the old episodes just because they have SNL set as a series recording on the DVR.Vidor wrote:It was OK, but NBC is not doing it any favors by showing the Not Ready For Prime Time Players in the 10 pm slot. Steve Martin doing "King Tut" and Aykroyd & Curtin doiing that Point/Counterpoint about abortion is a pretty dramatic contrast to the modern show.MrCrowesGarden wrote:I thought this weekend's SNL was excellent. Sarah Silverman's monologue was the best I've seen in a long time (and I'm glad to see something other than singing a song). I really like Michael Che on Weekend Update. Jost is better, but still pretty bad.
- thrill
- bronoun enthusiast
- Posts: 30539
- Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
- Location: barely online
Re: TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery
Which means I'll give Twin Peaks it's third chance to grab me. I've tried to watch the first episode twice and haven't gotten through it, let alone interested. Feel like it's something I'm supposed to like.ghostrunner wrote:Twin Peaks is coming back.
-
Jocephus
- 99% conan clips
- Posts: 64992
- Joined: April 18 06, 5:14 pm
Re: TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery
i really got into twin peaks until about 3/4's thru the season ,then it just lost me
whats her name...audrey horne...woowee
whats her name...audrey horne...woowee
- ghostrunner
- GOAT
- Posts: 30868
- Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm
Re: TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery
Thinking about a rewatch and it may not hold up. The main appeal at the time was that there was just nothing else like it on TV. Or even in film. This was pre-basic cable drama, pre-prestigious HBO programming. HBO had some good movies and miniseries, maybe "Dream On"? But that was about ittrill wrote:Which means I'll give Twin Peaks it's third chance to grab me. I've tried to watch the first episode twice and haven't gotten through it, let alone interested. Feel like it's something I'm supposed to like.ghostrunner wrote:Twin Peaks is coming back.
-
Vidor
- You've just been hit by...VidorSmarm™
- Posts: 22956
- Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm
Re: TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery
I hope some of them are. That Chevy Chase/Richard Pryor "word association" sketch was extraordinary.MrCrowesGarden wrote:I wonder how many younger people stumbled into the old episodes just because they have SNL set as a series recording on the DVR.Vidor wrote:It was OK, but NBC is not doing it any favors by showing the Not Ready For Prime Time Players in the 10 pm slot. Steve Martin doing "King Tut" and Aykroyd & Curtin doiing that Point/Counterpoint about abortion is a pretty dramatic contrast to the modern show.MrCrowesGarden wrote:I thought this weekend's SNL was excellent. Sarah Silverman's monologue was the best I've seen in a long time (and I'm glad to see something other than singing a song). I really like Michael Che on Weekend Update. Jost is better, but still pretty bad.
-
Vidor
- You've just been hit by...VidorSmarm™
- Posts: 22956
- Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm
Re: TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery
Sherilyn Fenn. I was 17 when "Twin Peaks" aired. Goddamn, Sherilyn Fenn. Then she made that "Boxing Helena" movie and her career never recovered.Jocephus wrote:i really got into twin peaks until about 3/4's thru the season ,then it just lost me
whats her name...audrey horne...woowee
