AWvsCBsteeeerike3 wrote:I guess this is as good of a place to post this as any since we're all talking about it.
Are the super long warranties worth it? It seems like a lot of cars come with 100K mile powertrain warranties, BUT the car has to be serviced and be checked at the dealership where the prices are outrageous. If you're paying $75 for an oil change every 3K miles and $700 for a checkup every 15-30K miles, is that long warranty really a 'deal'? The cost is going to be what $4K. The odds of a transmission, driveshaft and/or engine needing replaced/repaired in the first 100K miles has to be pretty low in this day and age, no? And if you do get a lemon, it should be apparent in the first 10K miles, I'd think. So, the warranty extension isn't really necessary, in my mind.
Thus, the maintenance costs at the dealership give the owner little other than peace of mind that in the unlikely event their new car's engine blows up, they won't have to pay to replace it....
Whoa ... I just read something. The change oil/3K thing is not necessary, most cars it's at least 5K if not more. I use a synthetic and go 10K or about 1 time per year. When those manufacturers say all maintenance free for the first x miles like BMW does - that's basically two oil changes.
Don't change your oil every 3k. It's just not necessary with the majority of cars. And I do recommend running with a synthetic. It will pay for itself easily.
As far as stuff going bad, it's still going to happen. Lots of moving parts in a car. We had a 2004 Volvo s60 blow a transmission at 70k. That was expensive because you pretty much have to do those through the dealer. I hate those cars. One of the many reasons I prefer the old fashioned manual transmission (my Mustang is a straight manual - no paddle shifters or anything). Way more fun to drive and way cheaper to buy and way cheaper to maintain. Knock on wood I have driven almost nothing but manual's for my adult life and I have never once burned through a clutch.