Honestly, what you're saying is true for cooking in general. A lot of it is pretty bad and I absolutely agree knowing classic cooking is important. I doubt you'll find any serious modernist restaurant where the chef doesn't have a solid foundation in the classics.haltz wrote:The molecular gastronomy movement isn't all that new, and about 90% bull [expletive]. Kids who think they are Ferran Adria who don't know how to classically cook but own a tank of nitrous or a sous vide machine. Masturbatory whimsy and style over substance. (Alinea is probably really cool and part of the 10%... I'm not familiar.)
Personally, I think the most interesting thing about modernist cooking are the favor combinations, moreso then the high tech cooking and presentations. Although I will admit I prefer modernist style over traditional presentations. It can be a lot of fun.
haha so true. When I was at graham elliot they combined foie gras lollipops with pop rocks. Blah, I said no, I hate foie gras anyway.thrill wrote:HEY LOOK I MADE A FOIE GRAS LOLLIPOP WORSHIP ME




