Rave: St. Louis

The forum for ranting, raving, complaining and praising
Post Reply
Online
User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 31084
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: Rave: St. Louis

Post by Popeye_Card »

Fat_Bulldog wrote:
jim wrote:
lukethedrifter wrote:
Fat_Bulldog wrote:Yeah, "The Social Club" should be called the "Tool Douchebag Club."

Guys like Luke frequent those places.
I'm way too highbrow for that place. Morgan St for me.
Almost positive I was at a place called Morgan St. When to a place called Mc something too. Basically it was :

1.Mc something or another with some cool people.
2.Can't remember what happened here.
3.Place where the bartenders wore thongs
4.Outdoor place with the fire pit with cool Cardinal fans.

before the Social Club. I liked all 4, the last being my favorite just because we met some cool people.
1. McGurk's
2. ?
3. Johnny's
4. Nadine's Gin Joint?
4. Molly's/Norton's

jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: Rave: St. Louis

Post by jim »

You guys are good .. I'm texting friends and some of your stuff is matching bits and pieces I am getting from them.

1. McGurks.
2. Shanty's?
3. Johnny's.
4. Molly's.

Online
User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 31084
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: Rave: St. Louis

Post by Popeye_Card »

jim wrote:You guys are good .. I'm texting friends and some of your stuff is matching bits and pieces I am getting from them.

1. McGurks.
2. Shanty's?
3. Johnny's.
4. Molly's.
2. Shanti - was it kind-of a hippie bar?

User avatar
The Third Man
It rubs the lotion on its skin.
Posts: 8935
Joined: July 17 06, 1:00 pm

Re: Rave: St. Louis

Post by The Third Man »

I didn't realize there were multiple skeevy "bartenders wearing underwear" bars in STL. I should visit soon.

Online
User avatar
Popeye_Card
GRB's most intelligent & humble poster
Posts: 31084
Joined: April 17 06, 11:25 am

Re: Rave: St. Louis

Post by Popeye_Card »

The Third Man wrote:I didn't realize there were multiple skeevy "bartenders wearing underwear" bars in STL. I should visit soon.
I wouldn't go too far out of your way. Most of them fall into three categories:

1.) Retired from stripping. 15 years ago.
2.) Too chubby to strip.
3.) Currently a stripper working a day job. But looks way worse with the lights on.

M1IRONMIKE
Well hello, pilgrim
Posts: 4129
Joined: October 7 06, 7:23 am
Location: springfield illinois

Re: Rave: St. Louis

Post by M1IRONMIKE »

In one of those places the douchebag bouncer got all bent out of shape when i was using my camera on my phone....wtf....it wasn't a strip joint nor was i taking video of the waitresses....he looked like this guy only quite a bit bigger....i should have blasted him

Image

jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: Rave: St. Louis

Post by jim »

Popeye_Card wrote:
The Third Man wrote:I didn't realize there were multiple skeevy "bartenders wearing underwear" bars in STL. I should visit soon.
I wouldn't go too far out of your way. Most of them fall into three categories:

1.) Retired from stripping. 15 years ago.
2.) Too chubby to strip.
3.) Currently a stripper working a day job. But looks way worse with the lights on.
Or ugly [expletive]. Literally. I didn't know the deal there, so I figured it was a costume. Maybe she overheard me talking about ugly her face was with one of my friends ... which is very possible given how loud and drunk I was ... but when I complimented her on her costume she just looked annoyed. I was thinking ... ok, you are wearing a thong for tips ... a guy compliments you ... and you are upset at me? Really?

This was girl #3 in popeye's chart, and I would also not goo too far out of your way.

jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: Rave: St. Louis

Post by jim »

M1IRONMIKE wrote:In one of those places the douchebag bouncer got all bent out of shape when i was using my camera on my phone....wtf....it wasn't a strip joint nor was i taking video of the waitresses....he looked like this guy only quite a bit bigger....i should have blasted him

Image
What is great about that was you were too drunk to use the phone properly and actually have video footage of this guy charging you.

M1IRONMIKE
Well hello, pilgrim
Posts: 4129
Joined: October 7 06, 7:23 am
Location: springfield illinois

Re: Rave: St. Louis

Post by M1IRONMIKE »

jim wrote:
M1IRONMIKE wrote:In one of those places the douchebag bouncer got all bent out of shape when i was using my camera on my phone....wtf....it wasn't a strip joint nor was i taking video of the waitresses....he looked like this guy only quite a bit bigger....i should have blasted him

Image
What is great about that was you were too drunk to use the phone properly and actually have video footage of this guy charging you.

[expletive] him i'm going back to light his ass up

jim
Red Lobster for the seafood lover in you
Posts: 50393
Joined: May 1 06, 2:41 pm

Re: Rave: St. Louis

Post by jim »

M1IRONMIKE wrote:
jim wrote:
M1IRONMIKE wrote:In one of those places the douchebag bouncer got all bent out of shape when i was using my camera on my phone....wtf....it wasn't a strip joint nor was i taking video of the waitresses....he looked like this guy only quite a bit bigger....i should have blasted him

Image
What is great about that was you were too drunk to use the phone properly and actually have video footage of this guy charging you.

[expletive] him i'm going back to light his ass up
Let's go. I'm there. Life is too short to pass on a drunken weekend in St. Louis I have decided.

Post Reply