movies

Chat about non-baseball topics. No political discussions!
Post Reply
User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: movies

Post by JL21 »

thrill wrote:Do you guys think people who aren't as knowledgeable about the source material will like it? I know I'll hate it just because I know too much about baseball, the early 2000's A's and the book itself, but I suspect people who just view it as a movie will like it.
Well, the screener audience clapped at the end. So... yeah, I think they will.

Even going deeper beyond the baseball stuff, it's a pretty clunky movie. But I suspect the average audience will enjoy the baseball stuff.

I'm trying hard to take off my baseball nerd hat and gauge it on its merits as a movie. Doing that, it seemed mostly mediocre, with some surprising humor.

User avatar
Leroy
a bad penny always turns up
Posts: 25228
Joined: April 17 06, 12:27 pm
Location: Hanging out with my redneck, white socks and Blue Ribbon beer.
Contact:

Re: movies

Post by Leroy »

I don't know squat about baseball and I'm pretty sure I'd hate it.

User avatar
thrill
bronoun enthusiast
Posts: 30539
Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
Location: barely online

Re: movies

Post by thrill »

Will Leitch: Loves baseball, doesn't like Moneyball: http://movies.yahoo.com/blogs/the-proje ... 27728.html
Roger Ebert: Does not love baseball, loves Moneyball: http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbc ... /110929999

Boom. Scientific poll. Sample size, schmample size.

User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: movies

Post by JL21 »

It's fresh on RT right now- a whopping 94%. I just read a glowing review on Pajiba that left me rolling my eyes.

If this movie gets any sort of Oscar buzz (aside from maybe Pitt), I'm going to be seriously pissed.

maddash
is eerily well-versed on Project Runway and irony
Posts: 8508
Joined: June 26 06, 3:07 pm

Re: movies

Post by maddash »

Apparently Soderbergh's idea for Moneyball was much more wonkish (heavy on the analytics and insider baseball knowledge).

User avatar
Maclowery
Child Pot Activist
Posts: 7742
Joined: June 15 06, 7:27 am
Location: NYC

Re: movies

Post by Maclowery »

I don't think there's a way they could have made a movie appeal to the masses and sabermetrics guys at the same time.

I feel it'd be like scenes involving poker in movies. Hardly realistic, but it sort of looks and sounds like the real thing on a superficial level. Case in point: Just re-watched Casino Royale the other day, and whoof was that poker scene insultingly dumb. Luckily I got to spend much of it lusting after Eva Green's superb gazongas.

User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: movies

Post by JL21 »

Yeah, but it's a lot more than that. I understand they can't show a bunch of Ivy League dudes sitting around a room beating off over WAR. There's just a lot of dumb stuff that would never happen.

-Billy Beane flies to Cleveland to meet with the Indians' GM for trade talks. Who [expletive] does that?

-Said GM- Mark Shapiro- turns him down for one player after another because the A's can't afford them. Again, how is that even remotely realistic? If I'm a rival GM and you want to give me stuff that I want for a player that I don't, why do I give a [expletive] what your payroll is?

-Beane fixates heavily on Ricardo Rincon. Ricardo. [expletive]. Rincon. A LOOGY.

-The characterization of DePo- aka "Peter Brand"- is reduced to a complete caricature of the standard fat baseball nerd living in his mom's basement. At any moment, I expected Hill to say "Gee willigers, Mister Beane. I sure do hope our calculations work!"

-Carlos Peña is shown as "an all-star" (in 2002) but Beane's angry because Scott Hattieberg isn't being used at 1B. So Beane gets angry one day and during a temper tantrum, calls the Tigers and trades Peña to them in a matter of seconds, all because of Beane's outburst over Hattieberg.

-The movie portrays Hattieberg as a weakling, a total [expletive] who's afraid to play 1B. No, I'm not making this up- he's [expletive] afraid to play 1B. And the evil ol' Art Howe, gosh darnit Mister Beane, won't use Hattie at 1B. Curse those old evil scouty scout types!

-The portrayal of Grady Fuson is just as goofy and wrong as the portrayal of DePo. Fuson is presented as, basically, Snidely Whiplash with a stack of OFP scores.

And on and on and on.

TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20007
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Re: movies

Post by TimeForGuinness »

JL21 wrote:Yeah, but it's a lot more than that. I understand they can't show a bunch of Ivy League dudes sitting around a room beating off over WAR. There's just a lot of dumb stuff that would never happen.

-Billy Beane flies to Cleveland to meet with the Indians' GM for trade talks. Who [expletive] does that?

-Said GM- Mark Shapiro- turns him down for one player after another because the A's can't afford them. Again, how is that even remotely realistic? If I'm a rival GM and you want to give me stuff that I want for a player that I don't, why do I give a [expletive] what your payroll is?

-Beane fixates heavily on Ricardo Rincon. Ricardo. [expletive]. Rincon. A LOOGY.

-The characterization of DePo- aka "Peter Brand"- is reduced to a complete caricature of the standard fat baseball nerd living in his mom's basement. At any moment, I expected Hill to say "Gee willigers, Mister Beane. I sure do hope our calculations work!"

-Carlos Peña is shown as "an all-star" (in 2002) but Beane's angry because Scott Hattieberg isn't being used at 1B. So Beane gets angry one day and during a temper tantrum, calls the Tigers and trades Peña to them in a matter of seconds, all because of Beane's outburst over Hattieberg.

-The movie portrays Hattieberg as a weakling, a total [expletive] who's afraid to play 1B. No, I'm not making this up- he's [expletive] afraid to play 1B. And the evil ol' Art Howe, gosh darnit Mister Beane, won't use Hattie at 1B. Curse those old evil scouty scout types!

-The portrayal of Grady Fuson is just as goofy and wrong as the portrayal of DePo. Fuson is presented as, basically, Snidely Whiplash with a stack of OFP scores.

And on and on and on.
...but you can't deny the awesomeness of Ron Washingtion.

User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: movies

Post by JL21 »

Yeah, Wash was awesome.

User avatar
TGantz
R-E-S-P-E-C-T...What Dr Pepper Means to Me
Posts: 6698
Joined: July 27 06, 11:59 pm
Location: The Lou

Re: movies

Post by TGantz »

Nerds. Watch a documentary if you want realistic behind the scenes action of how a franchise works.

It's a movie meant to entertain the masses, not give sabermetric nerds another thing to distract themselves from finishing while they have sex with their wives.

Post Reply