movies
- robbotis
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 4791
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:05 am
- Location: Minneapolis
Re: movies
Anybody see Splice?
Freaky and disturbing. Particularly when it got sexual.
Those blobs were eery. Don't mess w/ human chromosones.
Freaky and disturbing. Particularly when it got sexual.
Those blobs were eery. Don't mess w/ human chromosones.
- cardinalkarp
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 18743
- Joined: May 4 06, 8:44 am
Re: movies
Going to the Sky-View Drive-In theatre on sat night to see "Abduction" & "Warrior" so hopefully one of the two will be decent.
I think I'm more excited about going to a drive-in movie than the movies themselves.
I think I'm more excited about going to a drive-in movie than the movies themselves.
- JackofDiamonds
- Bringer of Boston Baked Blue Balls
- Posts: 15010
- Joined: April 16 06, 9:15 pm
Re: movies
Planning on doing some necking?cardinalkarp wrote:Going to the Sky-View Drive-In theatre on sat night to see "Abduction" & "Warrior" so hopefully one of the two will be decent.
I think I'm more excited about going to a drive-in movie than the movies themselves.
- vinsanity
- Chili dog truther
- Posts: 8836
- Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
- Location: Indianapolis
Re: movies
YOu can do some serious 'tail gating' at a good drive in. Coolers of beer and snacks. I saw a guy with a mattress in the back of his pickup at the last one.JackofDiamonds wrote:Planning on doing some necking?cardinalkarp wrote:Going to the Sky-View Drive-In theatre on sat night to see "Abduction" & "Warrior" so hopefully one of the two will be decent.
I think I'm more excited about going to a drive-in movie than the movies themselves.
Granted, it started raining.
- ghostrunner
- GOAT
- Posts: 30869
- Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm
Re: movies
Yes, it was decent up until the sex. Maybe David Cronenberg could've pulled that off, but they didn't.robbotis wrote:Anybody see Splice?
Freaky and disturbing. Particularly when it got sexual.
Those blobs were eery. Don't mess w/ human chromosones.
Those blobs looked like a penis crossed with a chicken breast.
- cardinalkarp
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 18743
- Joined: May 4 06, 8:44 am
Re: movies
YesJackofDiamonds wrote:Planning on doing some [expletive]?cardinalkarp wrote:Going to the Sky-View Drive-In theatre on sat night to see "Abduction" & "Warrior" so hopefully one of the two will be decent.
I think I'm more excited about going to a drive-in movie than the movies themselves.
-
Freed Roger
- Seeking a Zubaz seamstress
- Posts: 26073
- Joined: September 4 07, 1:48 pm
- Location: St. Louis
Re: movies
The drive-in across the river from my hometown (been gone for decades) showed disney-esque flicks (Herbie the Love Bug etc) on one screen and often had R-rated to porn on the screen behind it (Eager Beavers. )
I never had the cajones (actually and figuratively -was probably less than 8 years old-and a good guilt-ridden Catholic to boot) to turn back to sneak a peak at the good stuff. But oh the stories my buddy would tell about what he saw on the other screen...
I never had the cajones (actually and figuratively -was probably less than 8 years old-and a good guilt-ridden Catholic to boot) to turn back to sneak a peak at the good stuff. But oh the stories my buddy would tell about what he saw on the other screen...
- JL21
- NPR & THT Contributor
- Posts: 36109
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
- Location: Chocolate City
Re: movies
Nearly every single fear I had of why Moneyball might suck was confirmed last night. Jonah Hill is [expletive] horrible (as usual) and the fact that he's supposed to be Paul DePodesta is absurd. The baseball stuff is riddled with inaccuracies and the non-baseball stuff is sloppily put together, sort of spackled in as an afterthought.
Pitt was very good in it. I've been around baseball people and he looked and acted the part really well. Did I mention that Jonah Hill was [expletive] awful?
Pitt was very good in it. I've been around baseball people and he looked and acted the part really well. Did I mention that Jonah Hill was [expletive] awful?
-
TimeForGuinness
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 20007
- Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm
Re: movies
This.JL21 wrote:Nearly every single fear I had of why Moneyball might suck was confirmed last night. Jonah Hill is [expletive] horrible (as usual) and the fact that he's supposed to be Paul DePodesta is absurd. The baseball stuff is riddled with inaccuracies and the non-baseball stuff is sloppily put together, sort of spackled in as an afterthought.
Pitt was very good in it. I've been around baseball people and he looked and acted the part really well. Did I mention that Jonah Hill was [expletive] awful?
- thrill
- bronoun enthusiast
- Posts: 30539
- Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
- Location: barely online
Re: movies
Do you guys think people who aren't as knowledgeable about the source material will like it? I know I'll hate it just because I know too much about baseball, the early 2000's A's and the book itself, but I suspect people who just view it as a movie will like it.TimeForGuinness wrote:This.JL21 wrote:Nearly every single fear I had of why Moneyball might suck was confirmed last night. Jonah Hill is [expletive] horrible (as usual) and the fact that he's supposed to be Paul DePodesta is absurd. The baseball stuff is riddled with inaccuracies and the non-baseball stuff is sloppily put together, sort of spackled in as an afterthought.
Pitt was very good in it. I've been around baseball people and he looked and acted the part really well. Did I mention that Jonah Hill was [expletive] awful?



