NBA 10-11

[MrSaigon]

Those are some extremely weak arguments from the Miami Herald writer.

It's pretty stupid, especially the player of the week. Who gives a [expletive]? But seeing Rose's stats next to Westbrook's is interesting.

[MrSaigon]

Cavs over Heat in Cleveland. Awesome.

[InvincibleCakeEater]

Cavs over Heat in Cleveland. Awesome.

REDEMPTION

15-58

[lukethedrifter]

Cavs over Heat in Cleveland. Awesome.

REDEMPTION

15-58

What, the Cavs should have lost?

[InvincibleCakeEater]

Cavs over Heat in Cleveland. Awesome.

REDEMPTION

15-58

What, the Cavs should have lost?

yes

[Socnorb11]

Those are some extremely weak arguments from the Miami Herald writer.

It's pretty stupid, especially the player of the week. Who gives a [expletive]? But seeing Rose's stats next to Westbrook's is interesting.

Yeah, other than the Player of the Week thing (which is irrelevant), I think he makes a pretty good case.

[thrill]

The Westbrook v Rose argument is exhibit a in the case against using only stats to analyze the NBA. Watch a stretch of Bulls and Thunder games and you will see two completely different players when it comes to game management and closing.

Westbrook is a fabulous player though. Just not even the most valuable player on his team.

[stlouie_lipp]

LeBron is such a little [expletive].

http://www.cleveland.com/cavs/index.ssf ... re-ga.html

[InvincibleCakeEater]

LeBron is such a little [expletive].

http://www.cleveland.com/cavs/index.ssf ... re-ga.html

Yeah. Going to the bathroom is for losers.

[Socnorb11]

LeBron is such a little [expletive].

http://www.cleveland.com/cavs/index.ssf ... re-ga.html

Sooner or later he'll learn that he's better off saying nothing, as opposed to making an ignorant statement. Using the bathroom? Seriously? That's the best he could do?