The [expletive] Giants
Posted: October 30 14, 10:44 am
For the record, I don't have anything specifically against any Giants players on an individual basis.
I'm just pissed that they're such a mediocre team that somehow has a dynasty. Bumgarner and Posey are legit, and then you've got this second level of guys who are good-not-great (Pence, Sandoval). Then somehow, Bruce Bochy slaps all of this [expletive] together with mediocre players, Peruvian goat piss, the tears of Dodger fans, and some voodoo magic to create a World Series winner. It happening once was fine. Twice was annoying. Three times is completely ridiculous and an affront to the baseball Gods.
This year's team was a [expletive] play-in team, for chrissakes. 2012 was fine, but the 2010 team was 2 games away from losing the division to the Padres. 88 wins, 92 wins, and 94 wins for a "dynasty". Throw in the fact that they've beaten two Cardinal teams in the LCS along the way and it gives me so much red ass.
It'd be like if Crash won the Best Picture, and then there was a sequel to Crash and it won the Best Picture also, and then it became a trilogy and the third one won, too.
And before anyone throws the two Cardinals' WS win totals around, keep in mind that they've had 100, 105, two 97s, and a 95-win team that didn't win the WS since 2000.
I'm just pissed that they're such a mediocre team that somehow has a dynasty. Bumgarner and Posey are legit, and then you've got this second level of guys who are good-not-great (Pence, Sandoval). Then somehow, Bruce Bochy slaps all of this [expletive] together with mediocre players, Peruvian goat piss, the tears of Dodger fans, and some voodoo magic to create a World Series winner. It happening once was fine. Twice was annoying. Three times is completely ridiculous and an affront to the baseball Gods.
This year's team was a [expletive] play-in team, for chrissakes. 2012 was fine, but the 2010 team was 2 games away from losing the division to the Padres. 88 wins, 92 wins, and 94 wins for a "dynasty". Throw in the fact that they've beaten two Cardinal teams in the LCS along the way and it gives me so much red ass.
It'd be like if Crash won the Best Picture, and then there was a sequel to Crash and it won the Best Picture also, and then it became a trilogy and the third one won, too.
And before anyone throws the two Cardinals' WS win totals around, keep in mind that they've had 100, 105, two 97s, and a 95-win team that didn't win the WS since 2000.