Page 1 of 4
Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product? (NSFW)
Posted: November 22 08, 1:16 am
by docellis
This girl is beautiful in most photos. Why did they do this? I will not buy this product. Maybe the product is the ugly thing. Maybe this is the best the photographer could do with this product.
Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product?
Posted: November 22 08, 1:20 am
by TimeForGuinness
I agree...but I am confused...she's still gorgeous
Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product?
Posted: November 22 08, 1:21 am
by dangerous
I will start a rave:Victoria's Secret Catalogue thread
Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product?
Posted: November 22 08, 1:21 am
by G. Keenan
I'm gonna need some more examples of questionable lingerie before I can respond to the questions.
Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product?
Posted: November 22 08, 1:21 am
by dangerous
I bet she waxes her moustache
Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product?
Posted: November 22 08, 1:24 am
by docellis
this is the cutest thing they have for sale right now and they didn't even bother putting a model in it.
they are slacking.
Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product?
Posted: November 22 08, 1:34 am
by Jocephus
boing
Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product?
Posted: November 22 08, 3:02 am
by AdmiralKird
Whoever 'chose' the picture had bad taste. This is one of many shots the photographer took from different angles, and probably someone else decided this picture would showcase the product.
Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product?
Posted: November 22 08, 6:15 am
by cardsfansince82
I think it's just an ugly product. She should take it off immediately.
Re: Bad photo editor? Bad photographer? Ugly product?
Posted: November 22 08, 7:42 am
by M1IRONMIKE
docellis wrote:
this is the cutest thing they have for sale right now and they didn't even bother putting a model in it.
they are slacking.
Doc you should buy that and model it for us!