Page 1 of 2
Rant: Arby's' New Side
Posted: October 21 08, 1:52 pm
by Cronos
The Mac & Cheezers:
Do we really need to fry everything in plain sight? Besides, it really didn't taste all that good. At all.
You disappoint me, Arby's.
Re: Rant: Arby's' New Side
Posted: October 21 08, 1:55 pm
by cardinalkarp
It must be the new "in" side item because Jack n' the Box just came out w/ the same thing.
Re: Rant: Arby's' New Side
Posted: October 21 08, 1:58 pm
by Richie Allen
How about Pizza Hut's new Chocolate Dunkers
They've pretty much gotten to the point where they're catering to people that can't stand the idea of eating anything that is not completely horrible for you.
Re: Rant: Arby's' New Side
Posted: October 21 08, 2:04 pm
by docellis
/vomit
Re: Rant: Arby's' New Side
Posted: October 21 08, 2:28 pm
by heyzeus
Ya know, I usually endorse anything that is cheesy and fried...but this is just over the line. I can't condone this.
Re: Rant: Arby's' New Side
Posted: October 22 08, 5:00 am
by Tarver
wow, some folks have serious balls. I'd as soon ingest Drano as any of that [expletive].
Re: Rant: Arby's' New Side
Posted: October 22 08, 6:34 am
by jeffbgoofy
Richie Allen wrote:How about Pizza Hut's new Chocolate Dunkers
They've pretty much gotten to the point where they're catering to people that can't stand the idea of eating anything that is not completely horrible for you.
sorry, those things are aweeeeesome...
Re: Rant: Arby's' New Side
Posted: October 22 08, 9:37 am
by Michael
Re: Rant: Arby's' New Side
Posted: October 23 08, 7:14 am
by tscards
Those mac & cheesers actually aren't that bad -- tasting, that is!
Re: Rant: Arby's' New Side
Posted: October 23 08, 9:02 am
by Cronos
tscards wrote:Those mac & cheesers actually aren't that bad -- tasting, that is!
For the kind of caloric value inherent in any fried food, much less fried mac & cheese, I need to be relatively blown away. And it was very meh.