pioneer98 wrote:In all honesty, you could *almost* argue that the Giants would have about the same playoff odds as the Reds or Phillies. Yes, the Giants are better on paper right now but not by a ton. I couldn't find playoff odds yet but the opening 2018 World Series odds has the Giants with the same odds to win the World Series as the White Sox, Braves, and Angels.
That seems a little extreme, though I'm nitpicking. I think they're a much better shot than those teams, with the exception of the Angels. The White Sox, Phillies, and Braves have bright futures, to be sure, but it's still too early for them.
Anyway, I think you're right about the overall look of the franchise. They were a 64-win team with 67 Pythag wins and 66 wins by Base Runs, so it's not like there's a ton of hidden value in their baseline.
I think they're a good bet to get better production from some combination of Belt, Crawford, Pence (though he's less likely), Bumgarner is almost a lock, and Cueto. But even if they all improve by an average of 2.5 wins, and they add Stanton, you're still looking at a team a tick above .500 hoping for some good Pythag or Base Runs luck to get into the playoffs. And 2.5 wins per player is ambitious.
They DO have a lot of potentially useful young big leaguers on the fringe- Christian Arroyo, Andrew Suarez, Tyler Beede, Chris Shaw, Ryder Jones, Austin Slater, with Ty Blach and Chris Stratton already making the jump... nobody really a top-end type of player, but they could get an influx of depth. These are exactly the kinds of guys they've built on in the past (and frustrated the ever-living [expletive] out of us in 2012 and 2014). This crop feels worse than others and if it wasn't this specific organization, you'd write it off. But you can't ignore their history of turning chicken [expletive] into chicken salad.
Still... it's a long way to go to get to contention, Stanton or not. It has all the makings of a stars and scrubs team with him (hell, even without him) and that's a bad formula.