Interview thread embarassing?
- Leroy
- a bad penny always turns up
- Posts: 25217
- Joined: April 17 06, 12:27 pm
- Location: Hanging out with my redneck, white socks and Blue Ribbon beer.
- Contact:
Re: Interview thread embarassing?
What is really sad is that I seem to be a master of the 'site support / suggestions' forum, but just flail wildly in the wind over at 'rants'. 
-
Michael
- GRB Founder
- Posts: 35303
- Joined: December 31 69, 6:00 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: Interview thread embarassing?
jdk82 wrote:I dont hate the stats but I would definately be more interested if I knew what they meant and how to use them.
I just ask if I'm unsure of something, posters are always happy to explain them.
- docellis
- America's Most Beloved Twitter Joke Thief
- Posts: 24741
- Joined: April 18 06, 6:54 pm
Re: Interview thread embarassing?
jdk82 wrote:I dont hate the stats but I would definately be more interested if I knew what they meant and how to use them.
I read more baseball threads than I post in, but when someone starts using a stat I don't get I google it and usually get at least a rudimentary idea as to what they are discussing...
(I personally don't like doing math (some people do) so I'd rather have a general understanding than a deep one.)
And lol at sabertooth tigers...
- Leroy
- a bad penny always turns up
- Posts: 25217
- Joined: April 17 06, 12:27 pm
- Location: Hanging out with my redneck, white socks and Blue Ribbon beer.
- Contact:
Re: Interview thread embarassing?
Whoa, I didn't get that until just now.
- stretch
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 3966
- Joined: May 8 06, 8:26 pm
- Location: Joplin, MO
Re: Interview thread embarassing?
I kind of agree with your first paragraph, but I wouldn't use the word "nerdy".Arthur Dent wrote:Let me hazard a guess. I think people don't like advanced stats because they feel that their use constitutes an exclusionary elite discourse. (How's that for post-modern language?) You feel like you can't contribute because your observation is going to be pummeled by a bunch of advanced analysis to which you do not have access. Perhaps all this talk about VORP and EQA and whatnot seems to turn a simple game enjoyed by all into a nerdy intellectual exercise.
Anyway, I don't agree with this analysis, but I can see that it makes some sense.
And I don't mean to come off as a dick, either.
Oh, and the disenchantment that some feel with the forum has A LOT more to do about personalities than stats, IMO. But I guess you are always going to run into that.
-
planet planet
- http://tinyurl.com/2e4x5hy
- Posts: 24904
- Joined: April 15 06, 6:25 pm
- Location: St. Louis
Re: Interview thread embarassing?
I'm all over your rants, Leroy, but your social threadsLeroy wrote:What is really sad is that I seem to be a master of the 'site support / suggestions' forum, but just flail wildly in the wind over at 'rants'.
-
Arthur Dent
- Hall Of Famer
- Posts: 12536
- Joined: April 25 06, 6:43 pm
- Location: Austin
Re: Interview thread embarassing?
Isn't a "paper tiger" something designed to appear strong that is actually flimsy? Which arguments do you feel that way about?planet pujolsian wrote:I'm thinking these arguments are paper tigers.docellis wrote:Hmmm. This has nothing to do with the interview thread.
- Leroy
- a bad penny always turns up
- Posts: 25217
- Joined: April 17 06, 12:27 pm
- Location: Hanging out with my redneck, white socks and Blue Ribbon beer.
- Contact:
Re: Interview thread embarassing?
o noesplanet pujolsian wrote:I'm all over your rants, Leroy, but your social threadsLeroy wrote:What is really sad is that I seem to be a master of the 'site support / suggestions' forum, but just flail wildly in the wind over at 'rants'.
- wart57
- just can't quit you.
- Posts: 25058
- Joined: April 18 06, 4:33 pm
- Location: Lost
Re: Interview thread embarassing?
If i want to ask a silly question to a ball player, isn't that my right to do so?
-
Michael
- GRB Founder
- Posts: 35303
- Joined: December 31 69, 6:00 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: Interview thread embarassing?
There's a difference between asking a "lighter side" question and what went on in that thread. IMO it was completely derailed by silliness when it wasn't appropriate time to do so.wart57 wrote:If i want to ask a silly question to a ball player, isn't that my right to do so?



