movies

Chat about non-baseball topics. No political discussions!
Post Reply
User avatar
JL21
NPR & THT Contributor
Posts: 36109
Joined: April 18 06, 7:44 am
Location: Chocolate City

Re: movies

Post by JL21 »

heyzeus wrote:Birdman winning over Boyhood is like Jimmy Edmonds getting elected to the Hall with Willie Mays sitting on the shelf waiting.
Change Edmonds to Puckett or even Dimaggio, and I'm 100% down with this analogy.

It's not that I think Birdman is undeserving. I thought it was a great film. Many years, I'd fully support it winning a Best Picture. But not over Boyhood.

MrSaigon

Re: movies

Post by MrSaigon »

I can tell you the exact moment Boyhood lost the Oscar: When boy as an 8th grader is drinking beers with those high school seniors and throwing saw blades at sheetrock. Give me a day and I could find better actors then they used for that. Distractingly bad.

Wasn't Boyhood the favorite?

I didn't watch but I heard JK Simmons speech on the radio this morning. Awesome.

TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20007
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Re: movies

Post by TimeForGuinness »

Would Boyhood be just as good if it didn't have the "filmed over 12 years" gimmick?

TimeForGuinness
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 20007
Joined: April 18 06, 7:38 pm

Re: movies

Post by TimeForGuinness »

heyzeus wrote:
go birds wrote:I havent seen Birdman but i find it hard to believe it was as good as the amount of awards it won would suggest.
It's good. The cinematography is great, and Michael Keaton is great. But the concept of the movie itself, well, the movie thinks it is more clever and original than it is. Oh, theater is an art to be passionate about, and making movies is hard? Neat.
The Academy loves movies about movies/theater...

I still need to see Whiplash, that looks amazing.

User avatar
ghostrunner
GOAT
Posts: 30870
Joined: April 18 06, 9:40 pm

Re: movies

Post by ghostrunner »

TimeForGuinness wrote:Would Boyhood be just as good if it didn't have the "filmed over 12 years" gimmick?
I haven't seen it so maybe it's obvious, but I've been trying to think about what you get out of doing the movie that way that you don't by just casting a few different ages and doing it all in one go. Haven't come up with a great answer yet. I think pretty highly of Linklater though, so I'm inclined to think he's got a good reason.

User avatar
JoeMcKim
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 9248
Joined: September 8 09, 10:56 pm
Location: South County, St. Louis

Re: movies

Post by JoeMcKim »

If you have diffferent actors playing the same person you don't truly believe those actors are the same character since they're not entirely the same looking no matter how good of casting as you can get. Plus not only is Ellar Coltrane's character aged correctly over that time frame but also Ethan Hawke and Patricia Arquette's characters too.

User avatar
stlouie_lipp
Hallelujah Brother
Posts: 13380
Joined: April 17 06, 7:36 pm

Re: movies

Post by stlouie_lipp »

I wonder how many of the Academy voters are like these people? Never actually see the movies they are voting on. Probably more than you'd think.


Jocephus
99% conan clips
Posts: 64992
Joined: April 18 06, 5:14 pm

Re: movies

Post by Jocephus »

ive probably posted/mentioned it before but theres a clip of siskel and ebert, maybe even a few, when they are on letterman and they just rip the academy. saying that most of them dont see the movies, they ask others opinions, give ballots to spouses, etc.

MrSaigon

Re: movies

Post by MrSaigon »

I'm still most upset about no nom for The Lego Movie. Actually, it's the only thing I'm upset about.

User avatar
Famous Mortimer
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 3961
Joined: November 14 14, 5:23 am
Location: Cherokee

Re: movies

Post by Famous Mortimer »

Boyhood - the movie that dares to pose the question "what would it be like if someone grew up?"

(that joke courtesy of someone on Twitter)
Last edited by Famous Mortimer on February 23 15, 11:14 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply