movies

Chat about non-baseball topics. No political discussions!
Post Reply
Freed Roger
Seeking a Zubaz seamstress
Posts: 26073
Joined: September 4 07, 1:48 pm
Location: St. Louis

Re: Recently viewed movies

Post by Freed Roger »

Recently saw Hitchcock's "Frenzy" - its 3 stars, probably a lesser Hitchcock flick to me. Its a gritty tale about a psychopathic killer loose in London. Its one of Hitcock's later movies, so he makes use of the violence and nekkidness- more acceptable onscreen by then. You see the main murder of the film, preceded by a gross rape scene, which is quite different from the older Psycho - where you see the shadows and the blood circling the drain. Hitchcock did more with less in Pyscho, as opposed to Frenzy.

Its still good because the guy knows how to tell a tale and work in some twisted humor. camera angles you don't see from other moviemakers. But with the grunge of this movie, I miss the style and class of Hitchcocks older movies

Hard to believe - but saw "The Hustler" for only the first time. Great movie. Easily one of the best. Enough said.

Hound Dog
Fringe Major League Player
Posts: 89
Joined: August 13 08, 7:22 pm
Location: Some where in Illinois

Re: Recently viewed movies

Post by Hound Dog »

Saw The Station Agent - , a man born with dwarfism moves to rural New Jersey to live a life of solitude, only to meet a chatty hot dog vendor and a woman dealing with her own personal loss. This comedy sounds kind of odd, but it is a written, directed and acted very well.

User avatar
KyCardinalFan
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 5520
Joined: May 31 06, 3:16 pm
Location: Western Kentucky

Re: Recently viewed movies

Post by KyCardinalFan »

Freed Roger wrote:Hard to believe - but saw "The Hustler" for only the first time. Great movie. Easily one of the best. Enough said.
There's a lot of the classics and AFI's Top 100 that I've yet to see. I kind of have to be in the mood for it and I try to purge myself of preconceived ideas based on reviews and conventional wisdom. Which makes it harder to get into the mood for some - esp. the older, black and white films. I mean, after you know about Rosebud, is it worth seeing?

User avatar
The Third Man
It rubs the lotion on its skin.
Posts: 8935
Joined: July 17 06, 1:00 pm

Re: Recently viewed movies

Post by The Third Man »

By far yes. Citizen Kane is great for far more than a twist reveal.

User avatar
Richie Allen
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 7458
Joined: December 22 06, 1:06 am

Re: Recently viewed movies

Post by Richie Allen »

Hound Dog wrote:Saw The Station Agent - , a man born with dwarfism moves to rural New Jersey to live a life of solitude, only to meet a chatty hot dog vendor and a woman dealing with her own personal loss. This comedy sounds kind of odd, but it is a written, directed and acted very well.
I stumbled across this film last year and really enjoyed it.

Freed Roger
Seeking a Zubaz seamstress
Posts: 26073
Joined: September 4 07, 1:48 pm
Location: St. Louis

Re: Recently viewed movies

Post by Freed Roger »

KyCardinalFan wrote:
Freed Roger wrote:Hard to believe - but saw "The Hustler" for only the first time. Great movie. Easily one of the best. Enough said.
There's a lot of the classics and AFI's Top 100 that I've yet to see. I kind of have to be in the mood for it and I try to purge myself of preconceived ideas based on reviews and conventional wisdom. Which makes it harder to get into the mood for some - esp. the older, black and white films. I mean, after you know about Rosebud, is it worth seeing?
That AFI list tried to get a sampling of movies from all eras - thus it does have some really old films that, although they could still be good, I don't think I'd care to see them other than as passing curiousity.

I agree w/ third man - Citizen Kane is worth seeing, even though you may know some of the plot already.

User avatar
Richie Allen
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 7458
Joined: December 22 06, 1:06 am

Re: Recently viewed movies

Post by Richie Allen »

Freed Roger wrote:That AFI list tried to get a sampling of movies from all eras - thus it does have some really old films that, although they could still be good, I don't think I'd care to see them other than as passing curiousity.
In films...old is good! :D

It's funny, whenever I see those top 100 lists, especially AFI, I always get the feeling they're sprinkling in new films (although not deservedly) to keep the contemporary audience happy.

User avatar
KyCardinalFan
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 5520
Joined: May 31 06, 3:16 pm
Location: Western Kentucky

Re: Recently viewed movies

Post by KyCardinalFan »

Richie Allen wrote:
Freed Roger wrote:That AFI list tried to get a sampling of movies from all eras - thus it does have some really old films that, although they could still be good, I don't think I'd care to see them other than as passing curiousity.
In films...old is good! :D

It's funny, whenever I see those top 100 lists, especially AFI, I always get the feeling they're sprinkling in new films (although not deservedly) to keep the contemporary audience happy.
I feel the same way. IMO, they should prove they stand the test of time.

Although I think as one their criteria, the movie could be rated highly as groundbreaking than simply as a good plot, cinematography, etc.

Still, it's been a while since I've reviewed the list. Maybe my feelings have changed about some of the contemporary movies listed.

Freed Roger
Seeking a Zubaz seamstress
Posts: 26073
Joined: September 4 07, 1:48 pm
Location: St. Louis

Re: Recently viewed movies

Post by Freed Roger »

Richie Allen wrote:
Freed Roger wrote:That AFI list tried to get a sampling of movies from all eras - thus it does have some really old films that, although they could still be good, I don't think I'd care to see them other than as passing curiousity.
In films...old is good! :D

It's funny, whenever I see those top 100 lists, especially AFI, I always get the feeling they're sprinkling in new films (although not deservedly) to keep the contemporary audience happy.
When old, I was thinking - i
The General (1927)
Intolerance (1916)
City Lights (1931)

looking over the list, I do like a few from the 30s like Mr. Smith goes to Wash.

I do see your point RA , there as many modern ones I don't care for, and am surprised they are on the list - even though they may have been popular i.e. ET, TiTanic and several more.

User avatar
Richie Allen
Perennial All-Star
Posts: 7458
Joined: December 22 06, 1:06 am

Re: Recently viewed movies

Post by Richie Allen »

KyCardinalFan wrote:
Richie Allen wrote:
Freed Roger wrote:That AFI list tried to get a sampling of movies from all eras - thus it does have some really old films that, although they could still be good, I don't think I'd care to see them other than as passing curiousity.
In films...old is good! :D

It's funny, whenever I see those top 100 lists, especially AFI, I always get the feeling they're sprinkling in new films (although not deservedly) to keep the contemporary audience happy.
I feel the same way. IMO, they should prove they stand the test of time.

Although I think as one their criteria, the movie could be rated highly as groundbreaking than simply as a good plot, cinematography, etc.

Still, it's been a while since I've reviewed the list. Maybe my feelings have changed about some of the contemporary movies listed.
Right. If a movie's great and deserving of all the accolades, I wouldn't want to hold it hostage simply because it's too new. On the other hand, I think these lists are trying to be all things to all people with equal distribution among the decades. I know these lists are only entertainment and it's senseless to get into heated debates concerning them but I'll be the first to admit that I'm forever grateful to numerous lists and books over the years that have steered me toward hundreds of great films and directors that I might not have otherwise found.

Post Reply