TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery

Chat about non-baseball topics. No political discussions!
Post Reply
Vidor
You've just been hit by...VidorSmarm™
Posts: 22956
Joined: June 10 10, 7:50 pm

Re: TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery

Post by Vidor »

Oh, and in the last installment of "Matthew Weiner mines stock of old TV actors and teen idols", Helen "Supergirl" Slater played the group leader at the Esalen Institute.

User avatar
JackofDiamonds
Bringer of Boston Baked Blue Balls
Posts: 15010
Joined: April 16 06, 9:15 pm

Re: TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery

Post by JackofDiamonds »

Can someone send me a message when the Mad Men talk stops? I'm not quite ready to spoil myself yet.

Jocephus
99% conan clips
Posts: 64992
Joined: April 18 06, 5:14 pm

Re: TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery

Post by Jocephus »

JackofDiamonds wrote:Can someone send me a message when the Mad Men talk stops? I'm not quite ready to spoil myself yet.
we could if there wasn't an anti-vaccine like stance against the spoiler button!

User avatar
JackofDiamonds
Bringer of Boston Baked Blue Balls
Posts: 15010
Joined: April 16 06, 9:15 pm

Re: TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery

Post by JackofDiamonds »

Also, maybe it would be better if each show had its own thread. Do we need a 577 page TV thread?

User avatar
heyzeus
Everday Unicorn
Posts: 43329
Joined: April 21 06, 10:14 am
Location: Austin, TX

Re: TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery

Post by heyzeus »

I will not be satisfied until this thread is four digits.

User avatar
JackofDiamonds
Bringer of Boston Baked Blue Balls
Posts: 15010
Joined: April 16 06, 9:15 pm

Re: TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery

Post by JackofDiamonds »

TV Thread
heyzeus wrote:I will not be satisfied until this thread is four digits.

User avatar
33anda3rd
Replies Authoritatively
Posts: 8390
Joined: April 7 13, 9:45 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery

Post by 33anda3rd »

JackofDiamonds wrote:Also, maybe it would be better if each show had its own thread. Do we need a 577 page TV thread?
I suggested that a few pages ago, w/r/t TrueD2 and was told that there's already a thread. You probably missed it b/c it's easy to do in a 600-page TV thread where SNL sketches intermingle with Mad Men spoilers and talk of pilot episodes on Netflix and the virtues of David Spade.

User avatar
thrill
bronoun enthusiast
Posts: 30539
Joined: April 14 06, 10:45 pm
Location: barely online

Re: TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery

Post by thrill »

It's weird how you guys are talking about this as if you can't just click "New Topic" and make it happen.

User avatar
33anda3rd
Replies Authoritatively
Posts: 8390
Joined: April 7 13, 9:45 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery

Post by 33anda3rd »

I'll do that in the future if I'm first-in on a hot new TV show, but I'm behind on that stuff. I didn't start The Wire til season 3 or Mad Men til season 3 or Breaking Bad til season 4 or True Detective until like episode 5 when everyone was all "holy crap how have you not seen this?" Then I binge on them and catch up. So singular threads would be great for slowpokes like me who can catch up on ideas and POVs about a show without wading through other stuff from 2, 3, 5 years ago.

greenback44
Hall Of Famer
Posts: 11665
Joined: June 26 06, 8:54 pm
Location: In a Small Town with Jack and Diane

Re: TV Thread - beware, [expletive] can get spoilery

Post by greenback44 »

thrill wrote:It's weird how you guys are talking about this as if you can't just click "New Topic" and make it happen.
JackofDiamonds has to hug Leonard before he gets past that hang-up.

Post Reply