A Message Board Dedicated to Discussing St. Louis Cardinals Baseball!
https://gatewayredbirds.org/forum/
An 87 is still a B+, my friend.PujolJunkie wrote:McCain has complained about the disclosure of Obama's donors and donations.. meanwhile:
Obama -
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/summa ... =N00009638
McCain -
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/summa ... =N00006424
Over 13 percent of McCain's contributions are incomplete or lack disclosure -- nearly twice as much as Obama.
True. But the amount of disclosure is still almost the same, if Obama's isn't better.ghostrunner wrote:An 87 is still a B+, my friend.PujolJunkie wrote:McCain has complained about the disclosure of Obama's donors and donations.. meanwhile:
Obama -
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/summa ... =N00009638
McCain -
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/summa ... =N00006424
Over 13 percent of McCain's contributions are incomplete or lack disclosure -- nearly twice as much as Obama.
That was completely rhetorical on my part, but since you've prolonged the discussion I'm going back over the McCain side - what about that 5.5%? I bet it's from NAMBLA. And NAMPLA (the man/pig offshoot).PujolJunkie wrote:True. But the amount of disclosure is still almost the same, if Obama's isn't better.ghostrunner wrote:An 87 is still a B+, my friend.PujolJunkie wrote:McCain has complained about the disclosure of Obama's donors and donations.. meanwhile:
Obama -
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/summa ... =N00009638
McCain -
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/summa ... =N00006424
Over 13 percent of McCain's contributions are incomplete or lack disclosure -- nearly twice as much as Obama.
I'm betting on nWo. Obama's is from the deepest depths of Hell, considering he IS the Anti Christ and all.ghostrunner wrote:That was completely rhetorical on my part, but since you've prolonged the discussion I'm going back over the McCain side - what about that 5.5%? I bet it's from NAMBLA. And NAMPLA (the man/pig offshoot).PujolJunkie wrote:True. But the amount of disclosure is still almost the same, if Obama's isn't better.ghostrunner wrote:An 87 is still a B+, my friend.PujolJunkie wrote:McCain has complained about the disclosure of Obama's donors and donations.. meanwhile:
Obama -
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/summa ... =N00009638
McCain -
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/summa ... =N00006424
Over 13 percent of McCain's contributions are incomplete or lack disclosure -- nearly twice as much as Obama.
My gosh. It was a joke. Get over it.Jocephus wrote:classy.BW23 wrote:How many times?Jocephus wrote:i voted today
once, it was a mail in ballot.
It was a joke. Vote early, vote often. He voted early. Now time to vote often.JL21 wrote:I might be liberaler than anyone else here and I thought it was just an innocuous joke, folks.PujolJunkie wrote:It's only voter fraud if by Democrats.Jocephus wrote:classy.BW23 wrote:How many times?Jocephus wrote:i voted today
once, it was a mail in ballot.
Now excuse me while I go murder some babies since, you know, I don't care about life.
Ugh. And the Ku Klux Klan has endorsed a lot of states' same-sex marriage laws, too. Obama is as much of a domestic terrorist as anyone who opposes same-sex marriage is a Klansman.Radbird wrote:On the foxnews.com front page right now.
Obama, who has consistently downplayed his relationship with domestic
terrorist William Ayers, once gave a glowing endorsement of his book.
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/20 ... ook-ayers/
hard to tell with what youve said in thsi thread and no blue fontBW23 wrote:My gosh. It was a joke. Get over it.Jocephus wrote:classy.BW23 wrote:How many times?Jocephus wrote:i voted today
once, it was a mail in ballot.
