100% agree.Fat Strat wrote: I don't have high expectations for this season. I think our path will follow the Falcons. They surprised and won when Ryan was a rookie -- 11-5. Then got a hard schedule -- 9-7. Then made the final step up to 13-3 and a perennial contender with an easier schedule. 8-8 or 9-7 this year is about what I expect. Some will see that as a step back, but by my count we have one easy game -- at home against the Bills. Our non-division games include the Pats, Steelers, Dolphins, Packers, Jets, Colts, and Bears.
NFL offseason (abbreviated) thread
- InvincibleCakeEater
- GRB's obsessive compulsive baseball poster
- Posts: 28275
- Joined: October 12 07, 12:28 pm
- Location: Raptured
Re: NFL offseason (abbreviated) thread
- Swingingbunt
- All-Star
- Posts: 2904
- Joined: April 4 08, 9:49 am
- Location: Indianapolis
Re: NFL offseason (abbreviated) thread
Going 10-6 would be pretty sweet. And surprising.InvincibleCakeEater wrote:100% agree.Fat Strat wrote: I don't have high expectations for this season. I think our path will follow the Falcons. They surprised and won when Ryan was a rookie -- 11-5. Then got a hard schedule -- 9-7. Then made the final step up to 13-3 and a perennial contender with an easier schedule. 8-8 or 9-7 this year is about what I expect. Some will see that as a step back, but by my count we have one easy game -- at home against the Bills. Our non-division games include the Pats, Steelers, Dolphins, Packers, Jets, Colts, and Bears.
- InvincibleCakeEater
- GRB's obsessive compulsive baseball poster
- Posts: 28275
- Joined: October 12 07, 12:28 pm
- Location: Raptured
Re: NFL offseason (abbreviated) thread
Yes it would. I think 6-10 is more realistic than that though.Swingingbunt wrote:Going 10-6 would be pretty sweet. And surprising.InvincibleCakeEater wrote:100% agree.Fat Strat wrote: I don't have high expectations for this season. I think our path will follow the Falcons. They surprised and won when Ryan was a rookie -- 11-5. Then got a hard schedule -- 9-7. Then made the final step up to 13-3 and a perennial contender with an easier schedule. 8-8 or 9-7 this year is about what I expect. Some will see that as a step back, but by my count we have one easy game -- at home against the Bills. Our non-division games include the Pats, Steelers, Dolphins, Packers, Jets, Colts, and Bears.
- Lesson
- Grandmaster Flashchat
- Posts: 6630
- Joined: February 4 10, 4:35 pm
Re: NFL offseason (abbreviated) thread
Who can't read or write.Fat Strat wrote: Now all we have at that position is a 6th round pick this year.
- Swingingbunt
- All-Star
- Posts: 2904
- Joined: April 4 08, 9:49 am
- Location: Indianapolis
Re: NFL offseason (abbreviated) thread
I would like for Peyton Manning to reach out to Albert and have a heart to heart with him re: contracts. What an incredible gesture on Manning's part. Colts fans have to be thrilled.
- InvincibleCakeEater
- GRB's obsessive compulsive baseball poster
- Posts: 28275
- Joined: October 12 07, 12:28 pm
- Location: Raptured
Re: NFL offseason (abbreviated) thread
The NFL has a salary cap. MLB does not.Swingingbunt wrote:I would like for Peyton Manning to reach out to Albert and have a heart to heart with him re: contracts. What an incredible gesture on Manning's part. Colts fans have to be thrilled.
- Swingingbunt
- All-Star
- Posts: 2904
- Joined: April 4 08, 9:49 am
- Location: Indianapolis
Re: NFL offseason (abbreviated) thread
I understand that. The premise is more what I'm talking about...you know...not being a greedy money hungry sumbitch. Like 23 million a year is that much worse than 25 million a year.InvincibleCakeEater wrote:The NFL has a salary cap. MLB does not.Swingingbunt wrote:I would like for Peyton Manning to reach out to Albert and have a heart to heart with him re: contracts. What an incredible gesture on Manning's part. Colts fans have to be thrilled.
- InvincibleCakeEater
- GRB's obsessive compulsive baseball poster
- Posts: 28275
- Joined: October 12 07, 12:28 pm
- Location: Raptured
Re: NFL offseason (abbreviated) thread
And I find your premise ridiculous. Owners have a whole lot more money than players. A 130 million dollar payroll isn't much worse than a 128 million.Swingingbunt wrote:I understand that. The premise is more what I'm talking about...you know...not being a greedy money hungry sumbitch. Like 23 million a year is that much worse than 25 million a year.InvincibleCakeEater wrote:The NFL has a salary cap. MLB does not.Swingingbunt wrote:I would like for Peyton Manning to reach out to Albert and have a heart to heart with him re: contracts. What an incredible gesture on Manning's part. Colts fans have to be thrilled.
- cpebbles
- Perennial All-Star
- Posts: 8829
- Joined: August 30 07, 12:28 pm
Re: NFL offseason (abbreviated) thread
It's pretty amusing that Manning has been hailed for his selflessness in signing a deal that only matches the largest contract ever given instead of insisting that he sign for more. I don't think anyone seriously thinks he left more than a couple of million on the table, and the fact that he's been able to spin it this way probably makes that much back in public goodwill.
- vinsanity
- Chili dog truther
- Posts: 8836
- Joined: July 3 06, 2:19 pm
- Location: Indianapolis
Re: NFL offseason (abbreviated) thread
I think it's more that they got the deal done in a few days so the Colts can go try and make something happen in FA as opposed to stringing em along and handcuffing their options in the off-season.cpebbles wrote:It's pretty amusing that Manning has been hailed for his selflessness in signing a deal that only matches the largest contract ever given instead of insisting that he sign for more. I don't think anyone seriously thinks he left more than a couple of million on the table, and the fact that he's been able to spin it this way probably makes that much back in public goodwill.
I'm not hearing much in Indy about the 'hometown discount' angle. People are just happy he re-signed.


